Answer in brief
CVE-2024-42145 records a Unknown severity vulnerability in IB/core: Implement a limit on UMAD receive List. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
Analysis pending evidence review
HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.
Answer in brief
CVE-2024-42145 records a Unknown severity vulnerability in IB/core: Implement a limit on UMAD receive List. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
Analysis pending evidence review
HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.
A CVSS score is not reported in the current record. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.
Analysis status
Analysis pending evidence review
Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.
The current feed maps Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
| Package | Affected range | Fixed version |
|---|---|---|
| Linux/Linuxgeneric | 2.6.12 | Not reported |
| Linux/Linuxgeneric | >=1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 <1288cf1cceb0e6df276e182f5412370fb4169bcb || >=1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 <b4913702419d064ec4c4bbf7270643c95cc89a1b || >=1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 <62349fbf86b5e13b02721bdadf98c29afd1e7b5f || >=1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 <d73cb8862e4d6760ccc94d3b57b9ef6271400607 || >=1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 <63d202d948bb6d3a28cd8e8b96b160fa53e18baa || >=1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 <b8c5f635997f49c625178d1a0cb32a80ed33abe6 || >=1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 <a6627fba793cc75b7365d9504a0095fb2902dda4 || >=1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 <ca0b44e20a6f3032224599f02e7c8fb49525c894 | 1288cf1cceb0e6df276e182f5412370fb4169bcb, b4913702419d064ec4c4bbf7270643c95cc89a1b, 62349fbf86b5e13b02721bdadf98c29afd1e7b5f, d73cb8862e4d6760ccc94d3b57b9ef6271400607, 63d202d948bb6d3a28cd8e8b96b160fa53e18baa, b8c5f635997f49c625178d1a0cb32a80ed33abe6, a6627fba793cc75b7365d9504a0095fb2902dda4, ca0b44e20a6f3032224599f02e7c8fb49525c894 |
Published upstream
Jul 30, 2024
Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:recordSource modified
Aug 5, 2026
Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:recordFirst seen by HOL
Aug 5, 2026
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: IB/core: Implement a limit on UMAD receive List The existing behavior of ib_umad, which maintains received MAD packets in an unbounded list, poses a risk of uncontrolled growth. As user-space applications extract packets from this list, the rate of extraction may not match the rate of incoming packets, leading to potential list overflow. To address this, we introduce a limit to the size of the list. After considering typical scenarios, such as OpenSM processing, which can handle approximately 100k packets per second, and the 1-second retry timeout for most packets, we set the list size limit to 200k. Packets received beyond this limit are dropped, assuming they are likely timed out by the time they are handled by user-space. Notably, packets queued on the receive list due to reasons like timed-out sends are preserved even when the list is full.
Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.
A CVSS score is not reported in the current record. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.
Analysis status
Analysis pending evidence review
Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.
The current feed maps Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
| Package | Affected range | Fixed version |
|---|---|---|
| Linux/Linuxgeneric | 2.6.12 | Not reported |
| Linux/Linuxgeneric | >=1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 <1288cf1cceb0e6df276e182f5412370fb4169bcb || >=1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 <b4913702419d064ec4c4bbf7270643c95cc89a1b || >=1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 <62349fbf86b5e13b02721bdadf98c29afd1e7b5f || >=1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 <d73cb8862e4d6760ccc94d3b57b9ef6271400607 || >=1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 <63d202d948bb6d3a28cd8e8b96b160fa53e18baa || >=1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 <b8c5f635997f49c625178d1a0cb32a80ed33abe6 || >=1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 <a6627fba793cc75b7365d9504a0095fb2902dda4 || >=1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 <ca0b44e20a6f3032224599f02e7c8fb49525c894 | 1288cf1cceb0e6df276e182f5412370fb4169bcb, b4913702419d064ec4c4bbf7270643c95cc89a1b, 62349fbf86b5e13b02721bdadf98c29afd1e7b5f, d73cb8862e4d6760ccc94d3b57b9ef6271400607, 63d202d948bb6d3a28cd8e8b96b160fa53e18baa, b8c5f635997f49c625178d1a0cb32a80ed33abe6, a6627fba793cc75b7365d9504a0095fb2902dda4, ca0b44e20a6f3032224599f02e7c8fb49525c894 |
Published upstream
Jul 30, 2024
Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:recordSource modified
Aug 5, 2026
Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:recordFirst seen by HOL
Aug 5, 2026
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: IB/core: Implement a limit on UMAD receive List The existing behavior of ib_umad, which maintains received MAD packets in an unbounded list, poses a risk of uncontrolled growth. As user-space applications extract packets from this list, the rate of extraction may not match the rate of incoming packets, leading to potential list overflow. To address this, we introduce a limit to the size of the list. After considering typical scenarios, such as OpenSM processing, which can handle approximately 100k packets per second, and the 1-second retry timeout for most packets, we set the list size limit to 200k. Packets received beyond this limit are dropped, assuming they are likely timed out by the time they are handled by user-space. Notably, packets queued on the receive list due to reasons like timed-out sends are preserved even when the list is full.
Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.