HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorKeep agent security open: sponsor a project, place a banner, or fund a security initiative.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2025 13911 inductive automation ignition execution with
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
High · CVSS 6.4CVE-2025-13911

Inductive Automation Ignition Execution with Unnecessary PrivilegesCVE-2025-13911

Answer in brief

CVE-2025-13911 records a High severity (CVSS 6.4) vulnerability in Inductive Automation Ignition Execution with Unnecessary Privileges. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps Inductive Automation/Ignition (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Dec 18, 2025Updated Aug 28, 2026Source checked Oct 12, 2026First seen by HOL Aug 28, 2026Material review Aug 28, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
High · CVSS 6.4
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
1 mapped package or product
Fix availability
Not reported

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 6.4. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps Inductive Automation/Ignition (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
Inductive Automation/Ignitiongeneric8.1.x || 8.3.xNot reported

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for Inductive Automation/Ignition.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Source-reported workarounds: Inductive Automation encourages users to do the following in order to reduce the risk of this vulnerability: * Create a new dedicated local Windows account that will be used exclusively for the Ignition service (e.g. svc-ign) (this should not be a domain account). * Remove all group memberships from the service account (including Users and Administrators). * Add to security policy to log in as a service. * Add to “Deny log on locally” security policy. * Provide full read/write access only to the Ignition installation directory for the service account created in step 1. * Add read/write permissions to other directories in the local filesystem as needed (e.g: if configured to use optional Enterprise Administration Module to write automated backups to the file system). * Set deny access settings for service account on other directories not needed by the Ignition service. * Specifically the C:\Windows, C:\Users, and directories for any other applications in the Program Files or Program Files (x86) directories. * Use java param to change temp directory to a location within the Ignition install directory so the Users folder can be denied access to the Ignition service account. * Restrict project imports to verified and trusted sources only, ideally using checksums or digital signatures. * Use multiple environments (e.g. Dev, Test, Prod) with a staging workflow so that new data is never introduced directly to Production environments. See Ignition Deployment Best Practices. * When feasible, segment or isolate Ignition gateways from corporate resources and Windows Domains. * The Ignition service account or AD server object should never need Windows Domain or Windows Active Directory privileges. This would only be needed if an Asset Owners IT or OT department uses this for management outside Ignition. * Ignition may be federated with Active Directory environments (e.g. OT domains) by entering “Authentication Profile” credentials within the Ignition gateway itself. This could use secure LDAP, SAML, or OpenID Connect. * When feasible, enforce strong credential management and MFA for all users with Designer permissions (8.1.x and 8.3.x), Config Page permissions (8.1.x), and Config Write permissions (8.3.x). * When feasible, deploy Ignition within hardened or containerized environments. Mitigation guidance covering OS-level service account hardening for both Windows and Linux is available in Annex A of the Ignition Security Hardening Guide. Application-level controls under a default installation are in development. For more information and updates, users should refer to Inductive Automation's Trust Portal https://security.inductiveautomation.com .

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Dec 18, 2025

    Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Aug 28, 2026

    Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Aug 28, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • Source referencesecurity.inductiveautomation.com
  • CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogcisa.gov
Upstream source description

Ignition by Inductive Automation, when installed with default OS service account settings, may expose the host system to an elevated code execution risk via the gateway backup restore functionality. An authenticated user with Gateway Administrator privileges can import a malicious gateway backup (.gwbk) file containing crafted project resources, scripts, or modules, resulting in code execution on the host system. This affects both Windows and Linux installations. On Windows, default installations often run the Ignition service as NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM, resulting in code execution with full local system privileges. On Linux, default installations commonly run the Ignition service as root or with elevated privileges. Specific privilege level depends on installation configuration.

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Related CVEs

  • WP Job Openings < 4.0.0 - Admin+ Stored XSSSame generic ecosystem
  • Foreman: api filter lookup ignores a search-limited filter permissionSame generic ecosystem
  • Foreman: domain and subnet interface api skips host search filtersSame generic ecosystem
  • Plaintext Database Password Exposure in GV-E-Map Server V18.2.0ASame generic ecosystem
  • WP Comment Cleaner 6.1 - 7.1 - Subscriber+ Bulk Comment Deletion via nav_delete_all_commentSame generic ecosystem
  • PRVTPRO Amnezia-Web-Panel Backup Download app.py default credentialsSame generic ecosystem

Record context

Vulnerability class
Vulnerability
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-250
Source
CVE List V5
Source checked
Oct 12, 2026
References
3 linked sources
Open source record