HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorKeep agent security open: sponsor a project, place a banner, or fund a security initiative.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2025 15265 improper neutralization of input during web page
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
Medium severityCVE-2025-15265GHSA-6738-R8G5-QWP3

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in svelteCVE-2025-15265

Answer in brief

CVE-2025-15265 records a Medium severity vulnerability in Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in svelte. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps svelte (npm). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Jan 15, 2026Updated Jan 15, 2026Source checked Oct 10, 2026First seen by HOL Aug 25, 2026Material review Jan 15, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
Medium
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
1 mapped package or product
Fix availability
Not reported

Why this deserves its current priority

A CVSS score is not reported in the current record. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps svelte (npm). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
sveltenpm>=5.46.0,<=5.46.3Not reported

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for svelte.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Monitor this advisory for an available fix and review any installs of the affected package.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Jan 15, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Jan 15, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Aug 25, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
Upstream source description

## Summary An XSS vulnerability exists in Svelte 5.46.0-2 resulting from improper escaping of `hydratable` keys. If these keys incorporate untrusted user input, arbitrary JavaScript can be injected into server-rendered HTML. ## Details When using the [`hydratable`](https://svelte.dev/docs/svelte/hydratable) function, the first argument is used as a key to uniquely identify the data, such that the value is not regenerated in the browser. This key is embedded into a `<script>` block in the server-rendered `<head>` without escaping unsafe characters. A malicious key can break out of the script context and inject arbitrary JavaScript into the HTML response. ## Impact This is a cross-site scripting vulnerability affecting applications that have the `experimental.async` flag enabled and use `hydratable` with keys incorporating untrusted user input. - **Impact**: Arbitrary JS execution in the client’s browser. - **Exploitability**: Remote, single-request if key is attacker-controlled. - **Typical Outcomes**: - Session/token theft - DOM defacement - CSRF bypass via injected JS - Account takeover depending on cookie/session strategy Affected applications should upgrade to a patched version immediately.

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Related CVEs

  • Tina: Code injection via unescaped Git branch name in generated client sourceSame npm ecosystem
  • @tinacms/web-components: `tina-markdown` writes rich-text link URLs into `href` without scheme validation, allowing stored XSSSame npm ecosystem
  • TinaCMS admin preview iframe loads an attacker-controlled origin from the URL fragmentSame npm ecosystem

Record context

Vulnerability class
XSS
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
Not reported
Source
GitHub Security Advisories
Source checked
Oct 10, 2026
References
1 linked source
Open source record