HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2025 24979 lf edge ekuiper ssrf in external service in
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Affiliate program
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
Medium · CVSS 5.5CVE-2025-24979GHSA-PQQC-8V73-9GG2

LF Edge eKuiper: SSRF in External Service in github.com/lf-edge/ekuiperCVE-2025-24979

Answer in brief

CVE-2025-24979 records a Medium severity (CVSS 5.5) vulnerability in LF Edge eKuiper: SSRF in External Service in github.com/lf-edge/ekuiper. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps github.com/lf-edge/ekuiper (go), github.com/lf-edge/ekuiper/v2 (go), github.com/lf-edge/ekuiper/v2 (go). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Sep 9, 2026Updated Sep 17, 2026Source checked Nov 1, 2026First seen by HOL Sep 9, 2026Material review Sep 17, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
Medium · CVSS 5.5
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
3 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 5.5. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps github.com/lf-edge/ekuiper (go), github.com/lf-edge/ekuiper/v2 (go), github.com/lf-edge/ekuiper/v2 (go). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
github.com/lf-edge/ekuipergo>=0Not reported
github.com/lf-edge/ekuiper/v2go<2.4.02.4.0
github.com/lf-edge/ekuiper/v2go>=0 <2.4.02.4.0

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for github.com/lf-edge/ekuiper, github.com/lf-edge/ekuiper/v2, github.com/lf-edge/ekuiper/v2.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update github.com/lf-edge/ekuiper/v2 to 2.4.0; github.com/lf-edge/ekuiper/v2 to 2.4.0 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Sep 9, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Sep 17, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Sep 9, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
Upstream source description

### Summary Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in eKuiper allows an attacker with permissions to register external services or create rules to induce the eKuiper server to make requests to unintended network locations, such as internal services, loopback interfaces (localhost), or cloud metadata endpoints. ### Details Prior to v2.4.0, eKuiper external service registrations and HTTP invocations did not validate destination IP addresses. An attacker with access to the eKuiper management API could register an external service pointing to an internal address (such as `http://127.0.0.1:9081` or other internal network services) and trigger queries using service functions (e.g. `SELECT tsschemaless(...) FROM demo`). This allows probing internal networks, leaking sensitive information (such as internal endpoints/credentials), or interacting with internal APIs accessible to the eKuiper host. ### PoC 1. Create an external service with an address pointing to an internal network / localhost: ```json { "interfaces": { "tsschemaless": { "address": "http://127.0.0.1:9081", "protocol": "rest", "options": { "insecureSkipVerify": true, "headers": { "Accept-Charset": "utf-8" } }, "schemaless": true } } } ``` 2. Load it to eKuiper and create a rule invoking it, e.g.: `SELECT tsschemaless("get", "/metadata/sources/yaml/mqtt", *) FROM demo`. 3. Run the rule. When data flows through the stream, the response from the internal service is retrieved and can be routed to an external sink or inspected. ### Impact Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) allowing unauthorized access / probing of internal network services. ### Remediation & Patches - **Upgrade to eKuiper >= 2.4.0**: Starting with v2.4.0, SSRF protection (`httpx.GetSSRFDialContext`) is enabled by default across HTTP clients, blocking requests to private, loopback, link-local, multicast, and unspecified IP addresses. ### Workarounds (for versions < 2.4.0) If unable to upgrade immediately: 1. **Restrict Management API Access**: Restrict access to the eKuiper REST API (port 9081) and CLI using network firewalls, reverse proxies, and authentication so only trusted administrators can create or update services and rules. 2. **Egress Network Filtering**: Use firewall / iptables rules or container network isolation to block outbound requests from eKuiper to private subnets, loopback addresses, and cloud metadata endpoints (`169.254.169.254`). 3. **Audit Service Definitions**: Regularly review registered external services (`GET /services` or `bin/kuiper show services`) to verify target hosts. ### Notes for Users Upgrading to >= 2.4.0 - In v2.4.0 and later, `basic.enablePrivateNet` in `kuiper.yaml` defaults to `false` (blocking private network access). - If a developer's deployment legitimately requires eKuiper to communicate with internal REST services or private networks, they can explicitly opt in by setting `basic.enablePrivateNet: true` (or via environment variable `KUIPER__BASIC__ENABLEPRIVATENET=true`). Ensure eKuiper's API is protected before enabling this setting. Reported by Alexey Kosmachev, Bi.Zone

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Related CVEs

  • Google::Auth versions 0.12 for Perl allow server side request forgery via unvalidated credential_source URLs in AWS external account credentialsAlso CWE-918

Record context

Vulnerability class
SSRF
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-918
Source
GitHub Security Advisories
Source checked
Nov 1, 2026
References
4 linked sources
Open source record