Answer in brief
CVE-2025-40067 records a Unknown severity vulnerability in fs/ntfs3: reject index allocation if $BITMAP is empty but blocks exist. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
Analysis pending evidence review
HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.
A CVSS score is not reported in the current record. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.
Analysis status
Analysis pending evidence review
Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.
The current feed maps Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
| Package | Affected range | Fixed version |
|---|---|---|
| Linux/Linuxgeneric | >=b35a50d639ca5259466ef5fea85529bb4fb17d5b <978aac54e93ea35aab20b32ae393d3d33964e7ae || >=3ed2cc6a6e93fbeb8c0cafce1e7fb1f64a331dcc <be66551da203862c689c12e1d35ce87217c017c1 || >=d99208b91933fd2a58ed9ed321af07dacd06ddc3 <039ddf353cc33f6546a87ec1ac3210637d714bec || >=d99208b91933fd2a58ed9ed321af07dacd06ddc3 <0dc7117da8f92dd5fe077d712a756eccbe377d40 || 358d4f821c03add421a4c49290538a705852ccf1 || a285395020780adac1ffbc844069c3d700bf007a || >=6.6.102 <6.6.112 || >=6.12.42 <6.12.53 || >=6.15.10 <6.16 || >=6.16.1 <6.17 | 978aac54e93ea35aab20b32ae393d3d33964e7ae, be66551da203862c689c12e1d35ce87217c017c1, 039ddf353cc33f6546a87ec1ac3210637d714bec, 0dc7117da8f92dd5fe077d712a756eccbe377d40, 6.6.112, 6.12.53, 6.16, 6.17 |
| Linux/Linuxgeneric | 6.17 | Not reported |
Published upstream
Oct 28, 2025
Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:recordSource modified
Aug 5, 2026
Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:recordFirst seen by HOL
Aug 5, 2026
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fs/ntfs3: reject index allocation if $BITMAP is empty but blocks exist Index allocation requires at least one bit in the $BITMAP attribute to track usage of index entries. If the bitmap is empty while index blocks are already present, this reflects on-disk corruption. syzbot triggered this condition using a malformed NTFS image. During a rename() operation involving a long filename (which spans multiple index entries), the empty bitmap allowed the name to be added without valid tracking. Subsequent deletion of the original entry failed with -ENOENT, due to unexpected index state. Reject such cases by verifying that the bitmap is not empty when index blocks exist.
Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.