HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2025 43857 net imap rubygem vulnerable to possible dos by
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
Unknown severity · Source severity not reportedCVE-2025-43857GHSA-J3G3-5QV5-52MJ

net-imap rubygem vulnerable to possible DoS by memory exhaustionCVE-2025-43857

Answer in brief

CVE-2025-43857 records a Unknown severity vulnerability in net-imap rubygem vulnerable to possible DoS by memory exhaustion. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps net-imap (rubygems), net-imap (rubygems), net-imap (rubygems), net-imap (rubygems). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Apr 28, 2025Updated Sep 10, 2026Source checked Oct 25, 2026First seen by HOL Aug 7, 2026Material review Sep 10, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
Unknown severitySource severity not reported
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
4 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

A CVSS score is not reported in the current record. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps net-imap (rubygems), net-imap (rubygems), net-imap (rubygems), net-imap (rubygems). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
net-imaprubygems>=0.5.0 <0.5.70.5.7
net-imaprubygems>=0.4.0 <0.4.200.4.20
net-imaprubygems>=0.3.0 <0.3.90.3.9
net-imaprubygems>=0 <0.2.50.2.5

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for net-imap, net-imap, net-imap.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update net-imap to 0.5.7; net-imap to 0.4.20; net-imap to 0.3.9; net-imap to 0.2.5 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Apr 28, 2025

    Evidence: source:osv:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Sep 10, 2026

    Evidence: source:osv:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Aug 7, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • NVD vulnerability recordnvd.nist.gov
Upstream source description

### Summary There is a possibility for denial of service by memory exhaustion when `net-imap` reads server responses. At any time while the client is connected, a malicious server can send can send a "literal" byte count, which is automatically read by the client's receiver thread. The response reader immediately allocates memory for the number of bytes indicated by the server response. This should not be an issue when securely connecting to trusted IMAP servers that are well-behaved. It can affect insecure connections and buggy, untrusted, or compromised servers (for example, connecting to a user supplied hostname). ### Details The IMAP protocol allows "literal" strings to be sent in responses, prefixed with their size in curly braces (e.g. `{1234567890}\r\n`). When `Net::IMAP` receives a response containing a literal string, it calls `IO#read` with that size. When called with a size, `IO#read` immediately allocates memory to buffer the entire string before processing continues. The server does not need to send any more data. There is no limit on the size of literals that will be accepted. ### Fix #### Upgrade Users should upgrade to `net-imap` 0.5.7 or later. A configurable `max_response_size` limit has been added to `Net::IMAP`'s response reader. The `max_response_size` limit has also been backported to `net-imap` 0.2.5, 0.3.9, and 0.4.20. To set a global value for `max_response_size`, users must upgrade to `net-imap` ~> 0.4.20, or > 0.5.7. #### Configuration To avoid backward compatibility issues for secure connections to trusted well-behaved servers, the default `max_response_size` for `net-imap` 0.5.7 is _very high_ (512MiB), and the default `max_response_size` for `net-imap` ~> 0.4.20, ~> 0.3.9, and 0.2.5 is `nil` (unlimited). When connecting to untrusted servers or using insecure connections, a much lower `max_response_size` should be used. ```ruby # Set the global max_response_size (only ~> v0.4.20, > 0.5.7) Net::IMAP.config.max_response_size = 256 << 10 # 256 KiB # Set when creating the connection imap = Net::IMAP.new(hostname, ssl: true, max_response_size: 16 << 10) # 16 KiB # Set after creating the connection imap.max_response_size = 256 << 20 # 256 KiB # flush currently waiting read, to ensure the new setting is loaded imap.noop ``` _**Please Note:**_ `max_response_size` only limits the size _per response_. It does not prevent a flood of individual responses and it does not limit how many unhandled responses may be stored on the responses hash. Users are responsible for adding response handlers to prune excessive unhandled responses. #### Compatibility with lower `max_response_size` A lower `max_response_size` may cause a few commands which legitimately return very large responses to raise an exception and close the connection. The `max_response_size` could be temporarily set to a higher value, but paginated or limited versions of commands should be used whenever possible. For example, to fetch message bodies: ```ruby imap.max_response_size = 256 << 20 # 256 KiB imap.noop # flush currently waiting read # fetch a message in 252KiB chunks size = imap.uid_fetch(uid, "RFC822.SIZE").first.rfc822_size limit = 252 << 10 message = ((0..size) % limit).each_with_object("") {|offset, str| str << imap.uid_fetch(uid, "BODY.PEEK[]<#{offset}.#{limit}>").first.message(offset:) } imap.max_response_size = 16 << 20 # 16 KiB imap.noop # flush currently waiting read ``` ### References * PR to introduce max_response_size: https://github.com/ruby/net-imap/pull/444 * Specific commit: [0ae8576c1 - lib/net/imap/response_reader.rb](https://github.com/ruby/net-imap/pull/444/commits/0ae8576c1a90bcd9573f81bdad4b4b824642d105#diff-53721cb4d9c3fb86b95cc8476ca2df90968ad8c481645220c607034399151462) * Backport to 0.4: https://github.com/ruby/net-imap/pull/445 * Backport to 0.3: https://github.com/ruby/net-imap/pull/446 * Backport to 0.2: https://github.com/ruby/net-imap/pull/447

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Record context

Vulnerability class
Vulnerability
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
Not reported
Source
OSV
Source checked
Oct 25, 2026
References
10 linked sources
Open source record