HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2025 58058 githubcomulikunitzxz leaks memory when decoding a
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
Medium · CVSS 5.3CVE-2025-58058GHSA-JC7W-C686-C4V9

github.com/ulikunitz/xz leaks memory when decoding a corrupted multiple LZMA archivesCVE-2025-58058

Answer in brief

CVE-2025-58058 records a Medium severity (CVSS 5.3) vulnerability in github.com/ulikunitz/xz leaks memory when decoding a corrupted multiple LZMA archives. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps github.com/ulikunitz/xz (go). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Aug 28, 2025Updated Sep 26, 2026Source checked Oct 25, 2026First seen by HOL Sep 10, 2026Material review Sep 26, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
Medium · CVSS 5.3
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
1 mapped package or product
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 5.3. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps github.com/ulikunitz/xz (go). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
github.com/ulikunitz/xzgo>=0 <0.5.150.5.15

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for github.com/ulikunitz/xz.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update github.com/ulikunitz/xz to 0.5.15 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Aug 28, 2025

    Evidence: source:nvd:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Sep 26, 2026

    Evidence: source:nvd:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Sep 10, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • NVD vulnerability recordnvd.nist.gov
Upstream source description

### Summary It is possible to put data in front of an LZMA-encoded byte stream without detecting the situation while reading the header. This can lead to increased memory consumption because the current implementation allocates the full decoding buffer directly after reading the header. The LZMA header doesn't include a magic number or has a checksum to detect such an issue according to the [specification](https://github.com/jljusten/LZMA-SDK/blob/master/DOC/lzma-specification.txt). Note that the code recognizes the issue later while reading the stream, but at this time the memory allocation has already been done. ### Mitigations The release v0.5.15 includes following mitigations: - The ReaderConfig DictCap field is now interpreted as a limit for the dictionary size. - The default is 2 Gigabytes - 1 byte (2^31-1 bytes). - Users can check with the [Reader.Header] method what the actual values are in their LZMA files and set a smaller limit using ReaderConfig. - The dictionary size will not exceed the larger of the file size and the minimum dictionary size. This is another measure to prevent huge memory allocations for the dictionary. - The code supports stream sizes only up to a pebibyte (1024^5). Note that the original v0.5.14 version had a compiler error for 32 bit platforms, which has been fixed by v0.5.15. ### Methods affected Only software that uses [lzma.NewReader](https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/ulikunitz/xz/lzma#NewReader) or [lzma.ReaderConfig.NewReader](https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/ulikunitz/xz/lzma#ReaderConfig.NewReader) is affected. There is no issue for software using the xz functionality. I thank @GregoryBuligin for his report, which is provided below. ### Summary When unpacking a large number of LZMA archives, even in a single goroutine, if the first byte of the archive file is 0 (a zero byte added to the beginning), an error __writeMatch: distance out of range__ occurs. Memory consumption spikes sharply, and the GC clearly cannot handle this situation. ### Details Judging by the error __writeMatch: distance out of range__, the problems occur in the code around this function. https://github.com/ulikunitz/xz/blob/c8314b8f21e9c5e25b52da07544cac14db277e89/lzma/decoderdict.go#L81 ### PoC Run a function similar to this one in 1 or several goroutines on a multitude of LZMA archives that have a 0 (a zero byte) added to the beginning. ``` const ProjectLocalPath = "some/path" const TmpDir = "tmp" func UnpackLZMA(lzmaFile string) error { file, err := os.Open(lzmaFile) if err != nil { return err } defer file.Close() reader, err := lzma.NewReader(bufio.NewReader(file)) if err != nil { return err } tmpFile, err := os.CreateTemp(TmpDir, TmpLZMAPrefix) if err != nil { return err } defer func() { tmpFile.Close() _ = os.Remove(tmpFile.Name()) }() sha256Hasher := sha256.New() multiWriter := io.MultiWriter(tmpFile, sha256Hasher) if _, err = io.Copy(multiWriter, reader); err != nil { return err } unpackHash := hex.EncodeToString(sha256Hasher.Sum(nil)) unpackDir := filepath.Join( ProjectLocalPath, unpackHash[:2], ) _ = os.MkdirAll(unpackDir, DirPerm) unpackPath := filepath.Join(unpackDir, unpackHash) return os.Rename(tmpFile.Name(), unpackPath) } ``` ### Impact Servers with a small amount of RAM that download and unpack a large number of unverified LZMA archives

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Related CVEs

  • Starman versions before 0.4019 for Perl allow a stalled request body to hold a worker indefinitely, as read_timeout covers only the headersAlso CWE-770
  • Starman versions before 0.4019 for Perl allow memory exhaustion via unbounded buffering of chunked request bodiesAlso CWE-770
  • vLLM 0.18.0 before 0.31.0 Memory Exhaustion via media_io_kwargs num_frames OverrideAlso CWE-770

Record context

Vulnerability class
Vulnerability
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-770
Source
OSV
Source checked
Oct 25, 2026
References
4 linked sources
Open source record