HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2025 58752 vites serverfs settings were not applied to html
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
Low · CVSS 5.3CVE-2025-58752GHSA-JQFW-VQ24-V9C3

Vite's `server.fs` settings were not applied to HTML filesCVE-2025-58752

Answer in brief

CVE-2025-58752 records a Low severity (CVSS 5.3) vulnerability in Vite's `server.fs` settings were not applied to HTML files. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps vite (npm), vite (npm), vite (npm), vite (npm) and additional mapped packages. Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Sep 8, 2025Updated Sep 30, 2026Source checked Oct 25, 2026First seen by HOL Aug 25, 2026Material review Sep 30, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
Low · CVSS 5.3
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
9 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 5.3. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps vite (npm), vite (npm), vite (npm), vite (npm) and additional mapped packages. Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Affected products and reported versions
ProductAffected versionsFixed versions
cpe:2.3:a:vitejs:vite:*:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*Not reportedNot reported
Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
vitenpm>=7.1.0,<=7.1.4Not reported
vitenpm>=7.0.0,<=7.0.6Not reported
vitenpm>=6.0.0,<=6.3.5Not reported
vitenpm<=5.4.19Not reported
vitenpm>=7.1.0 <7.1.57.1.5
vitenpm>=7.0.0 <7.0.77.0.7
vitenpm>=6.0.0 <6.3.66.3.6
vitenpm>=0 <5.4.205.4.20

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for vite, vite, vite.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update vite to 7.1.5; vite to 7.0.7; vite to 6.3.6; vite to 5.4.20 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Sep 8, 2025

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Sep 30, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Aug 25, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • NVD vulnerability recordnvd.nist.gov
Upstream source description

### Summary Any HTML files on the machine were served regardless of the `server.fs` settings. ### Impact Only apps that match the following conditions are affected: - explicitly exposes the Vite dev server to the network (using --host or [server.host config option](https://vitejs.dev/config/server-options.html#server-host)) - `appType: 'spa'` (default) or `appType: 'mpa'` is used This vulnerability also affects the preview server. The preview server allowed HTML files not under the output directory to be served. ### Details The [serveStaticMiddleware](https://github.com/vitejs/vite/blob/9719497adec4ad5ead21cafa19a324bb1d480194/packages/vite/src/node/server/middlewares/static.ts#L123) function is in charge of serving static files from the server. It returns the [viteServeStaticMiddleware](https://github.com/vitejs/vite/blob/9719497adec4ad5ead21cafa19a324bb1d480194/packages/vite/src/node/server/middlewares/static.ts#L136) function which runs the needed tests and serves the page. The viteServeStaticMiddleware function [checks if the extension of the requested file is ".html"](https://github.com/vitejs/vite/blob/9719497adec4ad5ead21cafa19a324bb1d480194/packages/vite/src/node/server/middlewares/static.ts#L144). If so, it doesn't serve the page. Instead, the server will go on to the next middlewares, in this case [htmlFallbackMiddleware](https://github.com/vitejs/vite/blob/9719497adec4ad5ead21cafa19a324bb1d480194/packages/vite/src/node/server/middlewares/htmlFallback.ts#L14), and then to [indexHtmlMiddleware](https://github.com/vitejs/vite/blob/9719497adec4ad5ead21cafa19a324bb1d480194/packages/vite/src/node/server/middlewares/indexHtml.ts#L438). These middlewares don't perform any test against allow or deny rules, and they don't make sure that the accessed file is in the root directory of the server. They just find the file and send back its contents to the client. ### PoC Execute the following shell commands: ``` npm create vite@latest cd vite-project/ echo "secret" > /tmp/secret.html npm install npm run dev ``` Then, in a different shell, run the following command: `curl -v --path-as-is 'http://localhost:5173/../../../../../../../../../../../tmp/secret.html'` The contents of /tmp/secret.html will be returned. This will also work for HTML files that are in the root directory of the project, but are in the deny list (or not in the allow list). Test that by stopping the running server (CTRL+C), and running the following commands in the server's shell: ``` echo 'import path from "node:path"; import { defineConfig } from "vite"; export default defineConfig({server: {fs: {deny: [path.resolve(__dirname, "secret_files/*")]}}})' > [vite.config.js](http://vite.config.js) mkdir secret_files echo "secret txt" > secret_files/secret.txt echo "secret html" > secret_files/secret.html npm run dev ``` Then, in a different shell, run the following command: `curl -v --path-as-is 'http://localhost:5173/secret_files/secret.txt'` You will receive a 403 HTTP Response,  because everything in the secret_files directory is denied. Now in the same shell run the following command: `curl -v --path-as-is 'http://localhost:5173/secret_files/secret.html'` You will receive the contents of secret_files/secret.html.

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Related CVEs

  • KodCloud KodExplorer Online Editor Save Endpoint editor.class.php unrestricted uploadAlso CWE-284
  • rclone v1.56.0 before v1.75.2 WebDAV Credential Header Leak on RedirectAlso CWE-200
  • Rclone 1.64.0 before 1.75.2 serve webdav Authentication Bypass via OPTIONS RequestsAlso CWE-200

Record context

Vulnerability class
Path Traversal
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-23, CWE-200, CWE-284
Source
GitHub Security Advisories
Source checked
Oct 25, 2026
References
8 linked sources
Open source record