HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorKeep agent security open: sponsor a project, place a banner, or fund a security initiative.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2025 59414 nuxt has client side path traversal in nuxt
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
Low · CVSS 3.1CVE-2025-59414GHSA-P6JQ-8VC4-79F6

Nuxt has Client-Side Path Traversal in Nuxt Island Payload RevivalCVE-2025-59414

Answer in brief

CVE-2025-59414 records a Low severity (CVSS 3.1) vulnerability in Nuxt has Client-Side Path Traversal in Nuxt Island Payload Revival. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps nuxt (npm), nuxt (npm), nuxt (npm). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Sep 17, 2025Updated Sep 18, 2025Source checked Oct 10, 2026First seen by HOL Aug 25, 2026Material review Sep 18, 2025
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
Low · CVSS 3.1
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
3 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 3.1. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps nuxt (npm), nuxt (npm), nuxt (npm). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
nuxtnpm>=3.6.0,<3.19.03.19.0
nuxtnpm>=4.0.0,<4.1.04.1.0
nuxtnpm>=3.6.0<3.19.0,>=4.0.0<4.1.0Not reported

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for nuxt, nuxt, nuxt.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update nuxt to 3.19.0; nuxt to 4.1.0 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Sep 17, 2025

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Sep 18, 2025

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Aug 25, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • NVD vulnerability recordnvd.nist.gov
Upstream source description

### Summary A client-side path traversal vulnerability in Nuxt's Island payload revival mechanism allowed attackers to manipulate client-side requests to different endpoints within the same application domain when specific prerendering conditions are met. ### Technical Details The vulnerability occurs in the client-side payload revival process (revive-payload.client.ts) where Nuxt Islands are automatically fetched when encountering serialized `__nuxt_island` objects. The issue affects the following flow: 1. During prerendering, if an API endpoint returns user-controlled data containing a crafted `__nuxt_island` object 2. This data gets serialized with `devalue.stringify` and stored in the prerendered page 3. When a client navigates to the prerendered page, `devalue.parse` deserializes the payload 4. The Island reviver attempts to fetch `/__nuxt_island/${key}.json` where `key` could contain path traversal sequences ### Prerequisites for Exploitation This vulnerability requires **all** of the following conditions: 1. **Prerendered pages**: The application must use Nuxt's prerendering feature (`nitro.prerender`) 2. **Attacker-controlled API responses**: The attacker must be able to control the response content of an API endpoint that is called during prerendering via `useFetch`, `useAsyncData`, or similar composables 3. **Client-side navigation**: A user must navigate to the prerendered page (not during initial SSR hydration) ### Attack Scenario ```javascript // Malicious API response during prerendering { "__nuxt_island": { "key": "../../../../internal/service", "params": { "action": "probe" } } } ``` This could cause the client to make requests to `/__nuxt_island/../../../../internal/service.json` if path traversal is not properly handled by the server. ### Impact Assessment - **Limited Impact**: The vulnerability has a low severity due to the highly specific prerequisites - **No Direct Data Exfiltration**: The vulnerability does not directly expose sensitive data - **Client-Side Only**: Requests originate from the client, not the server ### Mitigation **Action Required:** - Update to Nuxt 3.19.0+ or 4.1.0+ immediately - Review any prerendered pages that fetch external or user-controlled data **Temporary Workarounds** (if immediate update is not possible): 1. Disable prerendering for pages that fetch user-controlled data 2. Implement strict input validation on API endpoints used during prerendering 3. Use allowlists for API response structures during prerendering ### Fix Details [The fix](https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt/commit/2566d2046bccb158d98fb13e42ce4b2c33fb2595) implemented validation for Island keys in `revive-payload.server.ts`: - Island keys must match the pattern `/^[a-z][a-z\d-]*_[a-z\d]+$/i` - Maximum length of 100 characters - Prevents path traversal and special characters

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Related CVEs

  • Post Export Import with Media <= 1.17.1 - Authenticated (Administrator+) Path Traversal to Arbitrary File Read via 'file_path' Parameter in media_metadata.jsonAlso CWE-22

Record context

Vulnerability class
Path Traversal
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-22
Source
GitHub Security Advisories
Source checked
Oct 10, 2026
References
4 linked sources
Open source record