HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Gemini CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorKeep agent security open: sponsor a project, place a banner, or fund a security initiative.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 102369 unauthenticated remote code execution via mactool
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Plugins
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
High · CVSS 8.7CVE-2026-102369

Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution via MacTool Command Injection in TP-Link Tapo C120 & C200

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-102369 records a High severity (CVSS 8.7) vulnerability in Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution via MacTool Command Injection in TP-Link Tapo C120 & C200. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps TP-Link Systems Inc./Tapo C120 v1 (generic), TP-Link Systems Inc./Tapo C200 v5 (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Oct 1, 2026Updated Oct 1, 2026Source checked Oct 1, 2026First seen by HOL Oct 1, 2026Material review Oct 1, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Record context

Vulnerability class
Missing Auth
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-287
Source
CVE List V5
Source checked
Oct 1, 2026
References
5 linked sources
Open source record

Key facts

Risk
High · CVSS 8.7
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
2 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 8.7. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps TP-Link Systems Inc./Tapo C120 v1 (generic), TP-Link Systems Inc./Tapo C200 v5 (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
TP-Link Systems Inc./Tapo C120 v1generic>=0 <V1_1.9.4 Build 260813 Rel.79754nV1_1.9.4 Build 260813 Rel.79754n, V1_1.9.4
TP-Link Systems Inc./Tapo C200 v5generic>=0 <V5_1.4.6 Build 260709 Rel.27675nV5_1.4.6 Build 260709 Rel.27675n, V5_1.4.6

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for TP-Link Systems Inc./Tapo C120 v1, TP-Link Systems Inc./Tapo C200 v5.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update TP-Link Systems Inc./Tapo C120 v1 to V1_1.9.4 Build 260813 Rel.79754n; TP-Link Systems Inc./Tapo C200 v5 to V5_1.4.6 Build 260709 Rel.27675n if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Oct 1, 2026

    Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:record

  2. Source modified

    Oct 1, 2026

    Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:record

  3. First seen by HOL

    Oct 1, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • Source referencetp-link.com
  • Source referencetp-link.com
  • Source referencetp-link.com
  • Source referencetp-link.com
  • Source referencetp-link.com
Upstream source description

Tapo C120 v1 and C200 V5 do not adequately protect login challenge data or sanitize attacker-controlled input processed by the MacTool handler. An unauthenticated attacker on the same local network can replay login challenge data to obtain an administrative session, enable a privileged service that becomes accessible after a reboot, and submit crafted input to execute arbitrary commands within the device management process. Successful exploitation may allow arbitrary command execution on the camera and compromise the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the affected device. Exploitation requires access from the same local network, replay of the login challenge data, activation of the privileged service, and a device reboot.

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Related CVEs

  • Unauthenticated Onboarding Scan Information Disclosure in TP-Link Tapo C120 & C200Same tp-link systems inc./tapo c120 v1 package
  • Unauthenticated do Method Onboarding Connect Allows Wi‑Fi Reconfiguration Denial of Service Vulnerability in TP-Link Tapo C120 & C200Same tp-link systems inc./tapo c120 v1 package
  • Unauthenticated Onboarding Connect NULL Pointer Dereference Denial of Service Vulnerability in TP-Link Tapo C120 & C200Same tp-link systems inc./tapo c120 v1 package
  • Wormhole.app SSRFSame generic ecosystem
  • Out-of-bounds write in PeaZip PEA extractor allows code execution via a crafted .pea archiveSame generic ecosystem
  • Cadmos LTI exposure of sensitive information via debug modeSame generic ecosystem