HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorKeep agent security open: sponsor a project, place a banner, or fund a security initiative.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 104635 uncontrolled recursion in elixir protobufprotobuf
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
High · CVSS 8.2CVE-2026-104635

Uncontrolled recursion in elixir-protobuf/protobuf JSON decoding of self-referential messagesCVE-2026-104635

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-104635 records a High severity (CVSS 8.2) vulnerability in Uncontrolled recursion in elixir-protobuf/protobuf JSON decoding of self-referential messages. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps elixir-protobuf/elixir-protobuf/protobuf (generic), elixir-protobuf/elixir-protobuf/protobuf (generic), elixir-protobuf/protobuf (generic), elixir-protobuf/protobuf (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Oct 9, 2026Updated Oct 9, 2026Source checked Oct 9, 2026First seen by HOL Oct 9, 2026Material review Oct 9, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
High · CVSS 8.2
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
4 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 8.2. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps elixir-protobuf/elixir-protobuf/protobuf (generic), elixir-protobuf/elixir-protobuf/protobuf (generic), elixir-protobuf/protobuf (generic), elixir-protobuf/protobuf (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
elixir-protobuf/elixir-protobuf/protobufgeneric>=b0a1d4eaffaf50012fa71a8e931a47cf252d0370 <**
elixir-protobuf/elixir-protobuf/protobufgeneric>=b0a1d4eaffaf50012fa71a8e931a47cf252d0370 <e9432ad1c4099511905353cebcececa3a1f7c3ffe9432ad1c4099511905353cebcececa3a1f7c3ff
elixir-protobuf/protobufgeneric>=0.8.0 <**
elixir-protobuf/protobufgeneric>=0.8.0 <0.17.10.17.1

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for elixir-protobuf/elixir-protobuf/protobuf, elixir-protobuf/elixir-protobuf/protobuf, elixir-protobuf/protobuf.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Source-reported workaround: Reject JSON documents whose nesting depth exceeds a fixed bound at the web or middleware layer before passing them to the decoder. No decoder option limits recursion for user-defined message types, so the check must happen before Protobuf.JSON.decode/3, Protobuf.JSON.decode!/3, or Protobuf.JSON.from_decoded/3 is called.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Oct 9, 2026

    Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Oct 9, 2026

    Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Oct 9, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • Source referencecna.erlef.org
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • Source referenceosv.dev
Upstream source description

Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in Protobuf.JSON.Decode in elixir-protobuf protobuf allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to crash the decoding process via a deeply nested JSON document. Any application that decodes attacker-supplied JSON with Protobuf.JSON.decode/3, Protobuf.JSON.decode!/3, or Protobuf.JSON.from_decoded/3 into a schema that contains a self-referential or cyclic message type is affected. In lib/protobuf/json/decode.ex, the embedded-message clause of decode_singular/3 recurses into internal_from_json_data/3 once per nesting level without incrementing or checking the decoder's depth counter. The depth guard increase_depth_and_maybe_throw/1 covers only the Google.Protobuf.ListValue and Google.Protobuf.Struct clauses, so the recursion_limit option has no effect on user-defined message types. Each nesting level allocates a stack frame and heap objects, and a sufficiently deep document exhausts the memory of the decoding process. Confidentiality and integrity are not affected. This issue affects protobuf: from 0.8.0 before 0.17.1.

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Related CVEs

  • Redux Framework <= 4.5.11 – Authenticated (Subscriber+) Privilege Escalation via Users ExtensionSame generic ecosystem
  • AWP Classifieds < 4.4.9 - Admin+ Arbitrary File Upload via ZIP ImportSame generic ecosystem
  • Ash.count, Ash.exists and Ash.aggregate skip related resources' read policies in filters and sortsSame generic ecosystem
  • Code Snippets < 3.10.0 - Admin+ Network-Scoped Snippet Activation and Deactivation via update_code_snippetSame generic ecosystem
  • Code Snippets < 3.10.0 - Admin+ SQLi in Migration Importers Leading to Network-Wide Credential Disclosure (Multisite)Same generic ecosystem
  • Privilege Escalation in Telerik Report Server Service-Agent HubSame generic ecosystem

Record context

Vulnerability class
Missing Auth
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-674
Source
CVE List V5
Source checked
Oct 9, 2026
References
5 linked sources
Open source record