HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorKeep agent security open: sponsor a project, place a banner, or fund a security initiative.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 105767 chainguard academy edu integrate platform docs
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
Low · CVSS 2.1CVE-2026-105767

Chainguard Academy (edu) integrate-platform-docs composite action interpolates inputs into shell commandsCVE-2026-105767

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-105767 records a Low severity (CVSS 2.1) vulnerability in Chainguard Academy (edu) integrate-platform-docs composite action interpolates inputs into shell commands. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps Chainguard/Chainguard Academy (edu) (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Oct 5, 2026Updated Oct 5, 2026Source checked Oct 5, 2026First seen by HOL Oct 5, 2026Material review Oct 5, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
Low · CVSS 2.1
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
1 mapped package or product
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 2.1. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps Chainguard/Chainguard Academy (edu) (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
Chainguard/Chainguard Academy (edu)generic>=7375a80caabcc31c33ec90f29687ed78c13d16ff <fb0efb2537d326ab18c07d620875b8ed2a4b39f3fb0efb2537d326ab18c07d620875b8ed2a4b39f3

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for Chainguard/Chainguard Academy (edu).
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Source-reported solution: Fixed in commit fb0efb2537d326ab18c07d620875b8ed2a4b39f3, which passes the inputs to the shell through environment variables instead of expression interpolation. Workflows that reference this action at an older ref should update to fb0efb2537d326ab18c07d620875b8ed2a4b39f3 or later.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Oct 5, 2026

    Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Oct 5, 2026

    Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Oct 5, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
Upstream source description

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command in the integrate-platform-docs composite GitHub Action of Chainguard Academy (edu) from commit 7375a80caabcc31c33ec90f29687ed78c13d16ff before commit fb0efb2537d326ab18c07d620875b8ed2a4b39f3 allows an actor who controls the project_id or storage_bucket inputs to execute arbitrary shell commands on the GitHub Actions runner, because the inputs are interpolated directly into Bash gcloud storage cp commands in several steps via ${{ inputs.* }} expressions. The only in-repository caller passed repository secrets and ran only on trusted triggers, so no untrusted input was known to reach the vulnerable steps.

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Related CVEs

  • Chainguard Academy (edu) Nginx directory redirect downgrades HTTPS requests to HTTPSame chainguard/chainguard academy (edu) package
  • Penpot: Authenticated OS Command Injection in Penpot SVG Exporter via Legacy fill-colorAlso CWE-78
  • Langflow: OS command injection (RCE) via arbitrary command in MCP stdio server configurationAlso CWE-78
  • Langflow: Authenticated RCE via MCP Stdio transport allows any user to execute arbitrary OS commands on the serverAlso CWE-78
  • Newell Brands DYMO ID document parsing failing file type extension authentication checkSame generic ecosystem
  • Newell Brands DYMO ID parent directory open to path traversal through improper spheres of controlSame generic ecosystem

Record context

Vulnerability class
Command Injection
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-78
Source
CVE List V5
Source checked
Oct 5, 2026
References
2 linked sources
Open source record