HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorKeep agent security open: sponsor a project, place a banner, or fund a security initiative.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 107584 not failing securely failing open in hmailserver
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
High · CVSS 7.4CVE-2026-107584

Not Failing Securely ('Failing Open') in hMailServerCVE-2026-107584

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-107584 records a High severity (CVSS 7.4) vulnerability in Not Failing Securely ('Failing Open') in hMailServer. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps Progressive Robot Ltd/hMailServer (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Oct 8, 2026Updated Oct 8, 2026Source checked Oct 8, 2026First seen by HOL Oct 8, 2026Material review Oct 8, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
High · CVSS 7.4
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
1 mapped package or product
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 7.4. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps Progressive Robot Ltd/hMailServer (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
Progressive Robot Ltd/hMailServergeneric>=6.0.0 <6.3.66.3.6

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for Progressive Robot Ltd/hMailServer.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Source-reported solution: Upgrade to hMailServer 6.3.6, which treats an incomplete, unsigned or unproven DNSSEC answer for a TLSA or MX lookup under a signed zone as indeterminate, does not use a mail exchanger whose lookup was indeterminate, defers the delivery when none is left, delivers only to mail exchangers named by a DNSSEC-validated MX record set, and (for a host whose DNS servers are IPv6 only) asks those IPv6 servers. Until then, for each recipient domain whose mail must be protected, an SMTP route that names its mail exchangers with the connection security 'STARTTLS (required)', with remote certificate verification on (VerifyRemoteSslCertificate=1), prevents delivery in cleartext or to another host for that domain; and the server's DNS resolver should be one reached over a trusted path, such as a validating resolver on the same host.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Oct 8, 2026

    Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Oct 8, 2026

    Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Oct 8, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • Source referencegitlab.com
  • Source referencegitlab.com
Upstream source description

Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.0.0 through 6.3.5 fails open when applying DANE (RFC 7672) to outbound SMTP delivery. The server's validating DNSSEC resolver treated a TLSA or MX lookup that did not complete (no answer, SERVFAIL, a malformed reply), an answer without the requested records and without an NSEC/NSEC3 proof of their absence, and an answer whose records carried no applicable RRSIG as if the recipient domain were unsigned, and from 6.2.19 it also delivered to mail exchangers taken from an unvalidated MX lookup that the DNSSEC-validated MX record set did not name. An attacker who can drop, forge or strip DNS answers on the path to the server's resolver, at the resolver, or between the resolver and the recipient domain's name servers, and who holds an active position on the SMTP path, can thereby disable DANE for a DNSSEC-signed recipient domain and cause messages to be delivered in cleartext or to a host of the attacker's choosing with an arbitrary certificate, where they can be read and modified.

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Related CVEs

  • Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity in hMailServerSame progressive robot ltd/hmailserver package
  • Improper Link Resolution Before File Access ('Link Following') in hMailServerSame progressive robot ltd/hmailserver package
  • Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity in hMailServerSame progressive robot ltd/hmailserver package
  • Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity in hMailServerSame progressive robot ltd/hmailserver package
  • Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity in hMailServerSame progressive robot ltd/hmailserver package
  • Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity in hMailServerSame progressive robot ltd/hmailserver package

Record context

Vulnerability class
Vulnerability
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-636
Source
CVE List V5
Source checked
Oct 8, 2026
References
2 linked sources
Open source record