HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorKeep agent security open: sponsor a project, place a banner, or fund a security initiative.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 10805 networkmanager networkmanager local privilege
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
Medium · CVSS 6.7CVE-2026-10805

Networkmanager: networkmanager: local privilege escalation via malformed mud urls in dhclient backendCVE-2026-10805

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-10805 records a Medium severity (CVSS 6.7) vulnerability in Networkmanager: networkmanager: local privilege escalation via malformed mud urls in dhclient backend. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps Red Hat/multicluster-engine/cluster-api-provider-aws-rhel9 (generic), Red Hat/networkmanager (generic), Red Hat/NetworkManager (generic), Red Hat/openshift4/kubernetes-nmstate-rhel8-operator (generic) and additional mapped packages. Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Jun 4, 2026Updated Sep 25, 2026Source checked Oct 8, 2026First seen by HOL Aug 24, 2026Material review Sep 25, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
Medium · CVSS 6.7
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
12 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Not reported

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 6.7. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps Red Hat/multicluster-engine/cluster-api-provider-aws-rhel9 (generic), Red Hat/networkmanager (generic), Red Hat/NetworkManager (generic), Red Hat/openshift4/kubernetes-nmstate-rhel8-operator (generic) and additional mapped packages. Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
Red Hat/multicluster-engine/cluster-api-provider-aws-rhel9generic*Not reported
Red Hat/networkmanagergeneric*Not reported
Red Hat/NetworkManagergeneric*Not reported
Red Hat/openshift4/kubernetes-nmstate-rhel8-operatorgeneric*Not reported
Red Hat/openshift4/kubernetes-nmstate-rhel9-operatorgeneric*Not reported
Red Hat/openshift4/ose-aws-cluster-api-controllers-rhel8generic*Not reported
Red Hat/openshift4/ose-aws-cluster-api-controllers-rhel9generic*Not reported
Red Hat/openshift4/ose-kubernetes-nmstate-handler-rhel8generic*Not reported
Red Hat/openshift4/ose-kubernetes-nmstate-handler-rhel9generic*Not reported
Red Hat/openshift4/ose-ovn-kubernetes-microshift-rhel9generic*Not reported
Red Hat/openshift4/ose-ovn-kubernetes-rhel9generic*Not reported
Red Hat/redhat-user-workloads/art-imagesgeneric*Not reported

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for Red Hat/multicluster-engine/cluster-api-provider-aws-rhel9, Red Hat/networkmanager, Red Hat/NetworkManager.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Source-reported workaround: To prevent exploitation, ensure NetworkManager is not configured to use the `dhclient` backend. The default configuration on Red Hat Enterprise Linux does not enable `dhclient`. If a custom configuration file, such as `/etc/NetworkManager/conf.d/00-dhcp.conf`, contains `[main] dhcp=dhclient`, remove or comment out this line. After modifying the configuration, restart the NetworkManager service: `sudo systemctl restart NetworkManager` Warning: Restarting the NetworkManager service will temporarily disrupt network connectivity.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Jun 4, 2026

    Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Sep 25, 2026

    Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Aug 24, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referencebugzilla.redhat.com
Upstream source description

A flaw was found in NetworkManager. This local privilege escalation vulnerability exists in NetworkManager's dhclient backend when processing malformed Manufacturer Usage Description (MUD) URLs. A local user can exploit this flaw to escalate privileges by triggering a script via a crafted MUD URL, provided an administrator has explicitly configured NetworkManager to use dhclient. This issue does not affect default configurations of NetworkManager.

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Related CVEs

  • Iskratel Innbox Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution via login.xgi CLI ParameterAlso CWE-78
  • Openfind|SecuShare Pro - OS Command InjectionAlso CWE-78
  • Heap-based Buffer Overflow in hMailServerSame generic ecosystem
  • Heap-based Buffer Overflow in hMailServerSame generic ecosystem
  • GPTranslate < 2.34.14 - Unauthenticated Stored XSS via REST API Translation StorageSame generic ecosystem
  • Airwallex Online Payments Gateway < 1.36.0 - Unauthenticated Payment Bypass via Forged WebhookSame generic ecosystem

Record context

Vulnerability class
Command Injection
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-78
Source
CVE List V5
Source checked
Oct 8, 2026
References
10 linked sources
Open source record