HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 10864 misp dashboard widget field selection may expose
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Contribute to HOL
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Affiliate program
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
Medium · CVSS 5.3CVE-2026-10864

MISP Dashboard widget field selection may expose restricted user and organisation dataCVE-2026-10864

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-10864 records a Medium severity (CVSS 5.3) vulnerability in MISP Dashboard widget field selection may expose restricted user and organisation data. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps misp/misp (generic), misp/misp (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Jun 4, 2026Updated Jun 22, 2026Source checked Nov 5, 2026First seen by HOL Jun 22, 2026Material review Jun 22, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
Medium · CVSS 5.3
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
2 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Not reported

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 5.3. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps misp/misp (generic), misp/misp (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
misp/mispgeneric0Not reported
misp/mispgeneric>=0 <=2.5.38Not reported

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for misp/misp, misp/misp.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Monitor this advisory for an available fix and review any installs of the affected package.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Jun 4, 2026

    Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Jun 22, 2026

    Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Jun 22, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
Upstream source description

A vulnerability in the MISP dashboard widgets allowed an authenticated user to manipulate the fields option and influence which fields were returned by the New Users and New Organisations widgets. In some cases, requesting a field set that became empty after validation or redaction could cause the underlying query to fall back to returning unintended model fields. For the New Users widget, this could allow a non-site-admin user to obtain user e-mail addresses even when user e-mail disclosure was disabled by configuration. For the New Organisations widget, crafted field selection could similarly result in unintended organisation fields being included in the dashboard response. The issue was caused by applying field filtering and redaction in a way that could leave the selected field list empty. The patch ensures that the allowed field list is built safely, that restricted fields such as user e-mail addresses are removed before user-supplied field selection is processed, and that an empty field selection falls back only to the permitted default fields. Impact: An authenticated low-privileged user with access to the affected dashboard widgets may be able to disclose restricted user or organisation metadata, including user e-mail addresses depending on configuration.

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Related CVEs

  • Car Dealer <= 4.73 - Unauthenticated Private/Draft/Pending Post Content Disclosure via cardealer_single_car_ajaxAlso CWE-200
  • Tutor LMS 1.6.4 - 4.1.3 - Subscriber+ Quiz Answer Key DisclosureAlso CWE-200
  • Essential Real Estate < 5.3.5 - Unauthenticated Unpublished Property Listing and Agent Contact Disclosure via property_print_ajaxAlso CWE-200
  • LiteSpeed Cache <= 7.9.1 - Unauthenticated Sensitive Information Disclosure (WooCommerce Store API Cart/Checkout PII + Cart-Token) via Public REST CachingAlso CWE-200

Record context

Vulnerability class
Arbitrary File Read
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-200
Source
CVE List V5
Source checked
Nov 5, 2026
References
1 linked source
Open source record