HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 111751 angularrouter denial of service via routerlink
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
High severityCVE-2026-111751GHSA-57XQ-RJX2-V5XH

@angular/router: Denial of Service via RouterLink Query Parameter Retention in Server-Side Rendering (SSR)CVE-2026-111751

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-111751 records a High severity vulnerability in @angular/router: Denial of Service via RouterLink Query Parameter Retention in Server-Side Rendering (SSR). The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps @angular/router (npm), @angular/router (npm), @angular/router (npm), @angular/router (npm). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Oct 20, 2026Updated Oct 20, 2026Source checked Oct 20, 2026First seen by HOL Oct 20, 2026Material review Oct 20, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Record context

Vulnerability class
Missing Auth
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-400, CWE-770
Source
GitHub Security Advisories
Source checked
Oct 20, 2026
References
6 linked sources
Open source record

Key facts

Risk
High
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
4 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

A CVSS score is not reported in the current record. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps @angular/router (npm), @angular/router (npm), @angular/router (npm), @angular/router (npm). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
@angular/routernpm>=22.0.0,<22.2.122.2.1
@angular/routernpm>=21.2.0,<21.2.2521.2.25
@angular/routernpm>=22.0.0 <22.2.122.2.1
@angular/routernpm>=21.2.0 <21.2.2521.2.25

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for @angular/router, @angular/router, @angular/router.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update @angular/router to 22.2.1; @angular/router to 21.2.25; @angular/router to 22.2.1; @angular/router to 21.2.25 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Oct 20, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Oct 20, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Oct 20, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
Upstream source description

A denial of service (DoS) vulnerability was identified in `@angular/router` when Server-Side Rendering (SSR) is enabled on Node.js (V8) and `RouterLink` directives are rendered with `queryParamsHandling: 'merge'` or `'preserve'`, configured either per link or globally via `defaultQueryParamsHandling`. Starting in v21.2.0 ([angular/angular#66181](https://github.com/angular/angular/pull/66181)), `RouterLink` internals were refactored to use signals, introducing a computed signal (`_urlTree`) that cached the returned `UrlTree` instance on the directive. Because each rendered link maintains an active `RouterLink` instance for the entire duration of the request lifecycle, the computed signal permanently pinned the `UrlTree` and its associated query parameter dictionary in the heap until the SSR response completed. When query parameter handling is set to `'merge'` or `'preserve'`, each link copies the incoming request's query parameters into its own `UrlTree`. During SSR, memory consumption scales multiplicatively: $$\text{Heap Retention} \approx (\text{Number of affected links}) \times (\text{Size of parsed query parameter map})$$ Because parsed JavaScript objects and property dictionaries require substantially more heap space than the raw query string—particularly when property names trigger dense array allocations under V8 property-storage heuristics—an attacker can supply oversized query strings to amplify heap consumption by orders of magnitude per in-flight request. ### Impact Successful exploitation allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to exhaust the Node.js old-space heap with modest concurrent request volume, terminating the SSR worker with an unrecoverable JavaScript heap out of memory fatal crash. * **Numeric Names Not Required:** Numeric query parameter names trigger larger V8 property-storage allocations (~558 KB per parsed dictionary in tests vs. ~197 KB for non-numeric equivalents), lowering the concurrency threshold needed for a crash. However, non-numeric query parameters also produce significant heap amplification and can exhaust worker memory with proportionally higher concurrency. * **Client-side SPAs Unaffected:** Pure client-side Angular applications (Single Page Applications without SSR) are not vulnerable, as local browser memory consumption does not cross a security boundary. ### Attack Preconditions & Vulnerable Configurations An application is affected only if all of the following conditions are met: 1. **SSR Enabled:** The application runs in a Server-Side Rendering environment powered by Node.js / V8. 2. **Merged or Preserved Query Parameters:** `RouterLink` elements rendered during SSR use `queryParamsHandling: 'merge'` or `'preserve'`, either bound explicitly on links or configured application-wide via `withRouterConfig({ defaultQueryParamsHandling: 'merge' })`. 3. **Upstream Proxy Forwards Long Request Lines:** Reverse proxies or load balancers (e.g., Nginx, AWS ALB, Cloudflare) forward long query strings to the Node.js application rather than rejecting them at the edge. (For example, Nginx's default 8 KB `large_client_header_buffers` limit rejects 16 KB request lines unless explicitly increased). 4. **Overlapping Renders:** Because retained memory is freed once each request completes, multiple concurrent requests must be processed simultaneously in the same Node.js worker instance (such as pages awaiting asynchronous data fetching, route resolvers, or external API calls during SSR). ### Exploit Payload Example An attacker issues concurrent HTTP requests containing dense query parameters to an SSR page that renders multiple merged links: ```http GET /products?0&17&34&51&68&85&...&48042 HTTP/1.1 Host: example.com ``` ### Patches The issue is resolved by removing persistent `UrlTree` retention from `RouterLink` ([angular/angular#70953](https://github.com/angular/angular/pull/70953)). `RouterLink` now tracks route dependencies directly in `reactiveHref` and discards intermediate `UrlTree` instances immediately after computing the serialized href string. The `urlTree` getter and click handlers compute `UrlTree` instances on demand. As a result, intermediate query parameter maps are short-lived allocations collected during young-generation GC scavenges rather than remaining pinned in the heap for the lifetime of the request, restoring the memory profile of Angular 21.1 and earlier. Patched versions: * `22.2.1` * `21.2.25` Versions prior to 21.2.0 (including Angular 20.x LTS and 21.1.x) do not retain `UrlTree` instances in `RouterLink` and are not vulnerable to this issue. ### Workarounds & Mitigations If you cannot immediately upgrade to a patched version, apply one or more of the following mitigations: 1. **Avoid 'merge' and 'preserve' on Server-Rendered Links:** Remove `defaultQueryParamsHandling: 'merge'` (or `'preserve'`) from global configuration. Explicitly bind only the specific query parameters each link requires (e.g., `[queryParams]="{ filter: filter() }"`). Even on patched versions, this practice prevents unnecessary request-derived parameter propagation into generated DOM markup. 2. **Limit Query String Length at Reverse Proxy or Middleware:** Configure your edge proxy, web application firewall (WAF), or reverse proxy to reject requests with excessively long query strings (e.g., exceeding 2,048 bytes). Alternatively, reject oversized query strings in Node.js before Angular SSR handles the request: ```ts // server.ts (before Angular SSR handler) app.use((req, res, next) => { const queryIndex = req.url.indexOf('?'); if (queryIndex !== -1 && req.url.length - queryIndex > 2048) { res.status(414).send('URI Too Long'); return; } next(); }); ``` 3. **Increase Node.js Old Space:** Increasing `--max-old-space-size` (e.g., to 2048 MB or 4096 MB) increases the memory headroom and the concurrency threshold required to exhaust memory, though it does not fully eliminate vulnerability under sustained traffic.

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.