HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 111752 angularrouter denial of service via unmatched
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
High severityCVE-2026-111752GHSA-62VG-58RM-QFF7

@angular/router: Denial of Service via Unmatched Empty-Path Outlet Route Matching in Server-Side Rendering (SSR)CVE-2026-111752

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-111752 records a High severity vulnerability in @angular/router: Denial of Service via Unmatched Empty-Path Outlet Route Matching in Server-Side Rendering (SSR). The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps @angular/router (npm), @angular/router (npm), @angular/router (npm), @angular/router (npm). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Oct 20, 2026Updated Oct 20, 2026Source checked Oct 20, 2026First seen by HOL Oct 20, 2026Material review Oct 20, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
High
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
4 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

A CVSS score is not reported in the current record. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps @angular/router (npm), @angular/router (npm), @angular/router (npm), @angular/router (npm). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
@angular/routernpm<=19.2.25Not reported
@angular/routernpm>=22.0.0,<22.2.122.2.1
@angular/routernpm>=21.0.0,<21.2.2521.2.25
@angular/routernpm>=20.0.0,<20.3.3320.3.33

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for @angular/router, @angular/router, @angular/router.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update @angular/router to 22.2.1; @angular/router to 21.2.25; @angular/router to 20.3.33 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Oct 20, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Oct 20, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Oct 20, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
Upstream source description

A denial of service (DoS) vulnerability was identified in `@angular/router` when Server-Side Rendering (SSR) is enabled on Node.js (V8). During route recognition, `@angular/router` fails to validate whether an auxiliary outlet segment in the URL matches a route configured for that specific outlet name. Because unconfigured empty-path outlet groups (such as `a:/()`, `x:/(...)`, or `///(...)`) are not rejected during matching, the router repeatedly re-evaluates the route configuration against each arbitrary outlet segment provided in the URL. When a request URL contains multiple arbitrary empty-path outlet segments, this improper matching forces the router to instantiate duplicate `ActivatedRouteSnapshot` trees, repeatedly execute `canMatch` guards and route resolvers, and allocate separate copies of route parameters and `queryParams` for each unconfigured outlet. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this behavior by sending requests with crafted outlet segments to exhaust the Node.js memory heap or overwhelm CPU resources, leading to SSR worker termination and service disruption. ### Impact Successful exploitation allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to exhaust the Node.js heap with a single crafted request or a small number of concurrent requests, terminating the SSR worker process with a fatal JavaScript heap out-of-memory crash. When the matched routes declare `canMatch` guards or resolvers, a single short request can also trigger repeated guard or resolver executions, increasing load on backend services and holding worker connections open. * **Transient Allocation:** Memory is released once route recognition completes; there is no persistent memory leak. The primary impact is process termination. * **Client-side SPAs Unaffected:** Client-side Angular applications running in the browser are not vulnerable, as browser memory consumption does not cross a security boundary. * **Prerendering (SSG) Unaffected:** Build-time prerendering does not process attacker-supplied request URLs. ### Attack Preconditions & Vulnerable Configurations An application is affected only if all of the following conditions are met: 1. **SSR Enabled:** The application renders on demand on a Node.js / V8 server. 2. **Susceptible Route Configuration:** At least one level of the route configuration contains either: * an empty-path (`path: ""`) route (e.g., `{path: "", component: ShopPage}`), or * a route assigned to a named outlet (e.g., `{path: "dashboard", children: [{path: ":id", outlet: "detail", component: DetailPanel}]}`). 3. **Upstream Request Line Forwarding:** Request lines reach the Node.js process without being rejected upstream by edge proxies. Node.js accepts request headers up to 16 KiB by default. Guard/resolver amplification requires only a short URL. 4. **Constrained Heap Size:** Worker heaps are sized small enough relative to the request payload and concurrency (e.g., containers or serverless instances configured with 128 MiB–1 GiB). ### Exploit Payload Examples Against a configuration with empty-path (`path: ""`) routes and query parameters: ```http GET /shop/(a:/()//b:/()//c:/()//...)?param1=value&param2=value... HTTP/1.1 Host: example.com ``` Against a configuration with named-outlet or sibling routes: ```http GET /dashboard/(detail:1//x:/(detail:1//x:/(...)//y:/(...))//y:/(...)) HTTP/1.1 Host: example.com ``` ### Patches The issue is resolved in [angular/angular#71055](https://github.com/angular/angular/pull/71055). The router now requires every child outlet segment group to match a route configured for its target outlet before unwrapping child segments or completing a match, and prevents unconfigured empty-path outlet groups from matching routes declared for other outlets. Patched versions: * `22.2.1` * `21.2.25` * `20.3.33` Versions prior to v20 are also affected but are no longer supported and will not receive a patch. ### Workarounds & Mitigations If you cannot immediately upgrade to a patched version, apply one or more of the following mitigations: 1. **Reject Parenthesized or Empty-Path Outlet URLs in Middleware or WAF (Recommended):** In `@angular/router`, auxiliary outlet groups in a URL always use parentheses `(...)`, and empty-path outlet groups in a URL always take the form `:/( `, `(/ `, or `///( `. * If your application does **not** use named (auxiliary) outlets in URLs, reject requests whose path contains `(` or `)` before Angular SSR handles the request. * If your application does use named outlets, reject requests whose path contains empty-path outlet sequences (`:/( `, `(/ `, or `///( `). Unlike URL length limits, this completely blocks both heap exhaustion and short-URL guard/resolver amplification: ```typescript // server.ts (placed before Angular SSR handler) app.use((req, res, next) => { let pathname: string; try { pathname = decodeURI(req.url.split(/[?#]/, 1)[0]); } catch { res.status(400).send("Bad Request"); return; } // Option A: If the app does not use named outlets in URLs, block all parenthesized groups: if (/[()]/.test(pathname)) { res.status(400).send("Bad Request"); return; } // Option B: If the app uses named outlets, block only empty-path outlet groups: if (/:\/\(|\(\//\(|\/\/\/\(/.test(pathname)) { res.status(400).send("Bad Request"); return; } next(); }); ``` 2. **Limit URL Length at Reverse Proxy or Middleware:** Configure your edge proxy, web application firewall (WAF), or reverse proxy to reject requests with excessively long URLs (e.g., exceeding 2,048 bytes). The outlet portion of the payload is in the path, so limit the full request target, not only the query string. This reduces, but does not eliminate, guard/resolver amplification, which requires only a short URL. 3. **Increase Node.js Old Space:** Increasing `--max-old-space-size` raises the request size and concurrency required to exhaust memory, though it does not eliminate the issue.

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Related CVEs

  • Deleting a user-mode module thread leaks its privileged kernel stackAlso CWE-400

Record context

Vulnerability class
Missing Auth
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-400, CWE-405
Source
GitHub Security Advisories
Source checked
Oct 20, 2026
References
8 linked sources
Open source record