HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorKeep agent security open: sponsor a project, place a banner, or fund a security initiative.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 12210 utcp gql ssrf cve 2026 44661 fix not applied to
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright ยฉ 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
Medium ยท CVSS 4.7CVE-2026-12210GHSA-PPX3-28RW-8FPF

utcp-gql SSRF: CVE-2026-44661 fix not applied to the GraphQL and WebSocket pluginsCVE-2026-12210

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-12210 records a Medium severity (CVSS 4.7) vulnerability in utcp-gql SSRF: CVE-2026-44661 fix not applied to the GraphQL and WebSocket plugins. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps utcp-gql (pip), utcp-websocket (pip). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Aug 25, 2026Updated Aug 25, 2026Source checked Oct 10, 2026First seen by HOL Aug 25, 2026Material review Aug 25, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
Medium ยท CVSS 4.7
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
2 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 4.7. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps utcp-gql (pip), utcp-websocket (pip). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
utcp-gqlpip<=1.1.01.1.1
utcp-websocketpip<=1.1.01.1.1

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for utcp-gql, utcp-websocket.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update utcp-gql to 1.1.1; utcp-websocket to 1.1.1 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Aug 25, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Aug 25, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Aug 25, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • NVD vulnerability recordnvd.nist.gov
  • Source referencevuldb.com
  • Source referencevuldb.com
  • Source referencevuldb.com
Upstream source description

### Summary The fix for CVE-2026-44661 (commit `5b16e43`) added the `ensure_secure_url()` / `is_secure_url()` helpers and wired them into the three HTTP-family plugins, but it did not reach the GraphQL or WebSocket plugins. The GraphQL plugin (`utcp-gql`) still uses the `startswith` prefix check that the fix explicitly replaced, so `http://127.0.0.1.attacker.example` and `http://localhost.evil.com` pass it. The WebSocket plugin (`utcp-websocket`) performs no URL validation at all, even though its own docstrings state it enforces "WSS or localhost only." Both plugins reach the same SSRF that CVE-2026-44661 was filed for, and because both attach the call template's configured auth headers to the outbound connection, the SSRF can also leak API keys and OAuth tokens to an attacker-controlled host. ### Details In the CVE-2026-44661 fix (commit `5b16e43` ("fix(http): block SSRF via attacker-controlled OpenAPI servers[0].url")), two things in it pointed at sibling issues. The commit message says the change is "replacing the duplicated prefix check", and the new `utcp_http/_security.py` docstring names the exact bug: > URLs whose hostname *starts* with `localhost` / `127.0.0.1` but isn't actually loopback (e.g. `http://localhost.evil.com`, `http://127.0.0.1.attacker.example`). The earlier `startswith` check let these through. The word "duplicated" says the vulnerable check existed in more than one place. The fix only updated the three HTTP-family plugins (`http`, `streamable_http`, `sse`). The other communication-protocol plugins were also inspected. **GraphQL plugin (`utcp-gql`).** `plugins/communication_protocols/gql/src/utcp_gql/gql_communication_protocol.py` still has the pre-fix check at line 43: ```python def _enforce_https_or_localhost(self, url: str) -> None: if not ( url.startswith("https://") or url.startswith("http://localhost") or url.startswith("http://127.0.0.1") ): raise ValueError("Security error: URL must use HTTPS or start with ...") ``` It is called on `manual_call_template.url` in `register_manual` (line 102) and on `tool_call_template.url` in `call_tool` (line 181). The URL then goes into `AIOHTTPTransport(url=...)` and a live GraphQL request. `"http://127.0.0.1.attacker.example/graphql".startswith("http://127.0.0.1")` is `True`, so the check passes. If the attacker controls DNS for `attacker.example`, that hostname resolves to any address they choose, including `169.254.169.254`, `127.0.0.1`, or an internal `192.168.x.x` host, and the GraphQL client sends a plain-HTTP request there. `http://localhost.evil.com/graphql` behaves the same way. This is the exact prefix bypass CVE-2026-44661 was filed for. **WebSocket plugin (`utcp-websocket`).** `plugins/communication_protocols/websocket/src/utcp_websocket/websocket_communication_protocol.py`. The module and class docstrings state: > "Security enforcement (WSS or localhost only)" > "Enforces security by requiring WSS or localhost connections" > "Security validation of connection URLs" There is no such validation in the code. `_get_connection()`, the only connection path (used by `register_manual`, `call_tool`, and `call_tool_streaming`), calls: ```python ws = await session.ws_connect(call_template.url, headers=headers, ...) # line 197 ``` with no scheme or host check. Any URL in a `WebSocketCallTemplate` connects, including `ws://169.254.169.254/`, `ws://127.0.0.1:<internal-port>/`, or any internal hostname. **Credential exposure.** Both plugins build connection headers in `_prepare_headers()`, which attaches the configured auth: `ApiKeyAuth` as a header, `BasicAuth` as an `Authorization: Basic` header, and `OAuth2Auth` as an `Authorization: Bearer` token. When the bypass is used to force a plain-HTTP or plain-WS connection to an attacker-resolved host, those credentials are sent to the attacker. This is the threat model CVE-2026-44661 already established: a UTCP client ingests tool manuals, and a malicious manual is attacker-influenced. The GraphQL and WebSocket plugins consume the same kind of call template, with the same `url` field, at the same trust level as the HTTP plugins that were fixed. Affected packages: `utcp-gql` and `utcp-websocket`, both at the current release `1.1.0`. Neither plugin has been modified since 2025-11-30, so both are unpatched on `main`. ### PoC The discrepancy is directly observable. With `utcp-gql` and `utcp-http` installed: ```python from utcp_gql.gql_communication_protocol import GraphQLCommunicationProtocol from utcp_http._security import is_secure_url bypass = "http://127.0.0.1.attacker.example/graphql" # The fixed HTTP plugin rejects the bypass URL: print("utcp_http is_secure_url:", is_secure_url(bypass)) # -> False # The GraphQL plugin accepts it (no exception is raised): GraphQLCommunicationProtocol()._enforce_https_or_localhost(bypass) print("utcp_gql _enforce_https_or_localhost: ACCEPTED") ``` End to end: a UTCP client that registers a manual declaring a GraphQL tool with `url: "http://127.0.0.1.<attacker-domain>/graphql"`, where that domain resolves to an internal target, issues the request to that internal service. For WebSocket, a manual declaring a tool with `url: "ws://169.254.169.254/"` connects with no check at all. To confirm the request lands, point the URL at a listener you control on a host the client can reach but the attacker cannot, or at the client's own loopback. ### Impact Server-Side Request Forgery (CWE-918), the same class and trust boundary as CVE-2026-44661. An attacker who can get a UTCP client to register a malicious manual can: - Make the client send GraphQL requests (GraphQL plugin) or open WebSocket connections (WebSocket plugin) to internal services and cloud metadata endpoints it would not otherwise reach. - Force plain-HTTP / plain-WS connections to an attacker-resolved host, defeating the "HTTPS or loopback only" guarantee both plugins are meant to provide. - Receive the call template's configured credentials (API key, Basic auth, OAuth Bearer token), because those headers are attached to the forged request. Suggested fix. The correct helper already exists in the codebase. Promote `is_secure_url` / `ensure_secure_url` from `utcp_http` into a shared module (or replicate the `urlparse`-based hostname logic), then replace `_enforce_https_or_localhost` in the GraphQL plugin with it, and add an equivalent check in the WebSocket plugin's `_get_connection` before `ws_connect`, adapted for the `ws` and `wss` schemes. This is the same centralization commit `5b16e43` already applied to the three HTTP plugins; it just needs to cover the remaining two transports. ## Patched - `utcp-gql` 1.1.1 replaces the broken `_enforce_https_or_localhost` prefix check with hostname-based `ensure_secure_url`, applied at both `register_manual` and `call_tool`. The underlying aiohttp session is also patched after `connect()` to refuse 3xx responses, closing the post-validation redirect SSRF on the GraphQL endpoint. - `utcp-websocket` 1.1.1 introduces `ensure_secure_ws_url` (the WebSocket-scheme companion of `ensure_secure_url`) and enforces it in both the `WebSocketCallTemplate` Pydantic field validator and `_get_connection`. `ws_connect` is called with `allow_redirects=False`. The OAuth2 token-fetch path uses the same redirect-safe helper introduced in `utcp-http` 1.1.4. Both plugins duplicate `_security.py` from `utcp-http` (rather than adding a cross-plugin runtime dependency); keep the copies in sync when changing validator behaviour. Upgrade to `utcp-gql >= 1.1.1` and/or `utcp-websocket >= 1.1.1`. No workaround in earlier versions.

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Record context

Vulnerability class
SSRF
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-918
Source
GitHub Security Advisories
Source checked
Oct 10, 2026
References
9 linked sources
Open source record