HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.
  • CIGARPoint your coding agent at the right lines and cut its token bill by about a third.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.
  • Gauntlet benchmarkGuard tested with real coding agents: safe work runs, risky actions stop.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 126080 active support possible dos vulnerability in
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard

Get HOL Guard for your computer

HOL Guard is a free desktop app that watches what coding agents such as Claude Code, Codex and Cursor run, read and install, and asks you before anything risky happens.

  • Download for macOS
  • Windows download
  • Linux download

Free. macOS 13+ on Apple silicon, Windows x64, Linux AppImage. Other ways to install

Star HOL Guard on GitHub to download
Runs on
macOS 13 or later on Apple silicon, Windows x64 and Linux x86_64.
Price
Free. Paid plans add Guard Cloud for teams. See pricing
Where your data stays
On your computer. Guard Cloud is optional.
Token savings
33% to 38% lower spend across three coding agents in our CIGAR benchmark.

HOL

HOL builds open infrastructure for AI agents: HOL Guard, a directory of AI plugins and MCP servers, an AI agent registry and the open HCS standards.

  • GitHub (opens in a new tab)
  • X (Twitter) (opens in a new tab)
  • YouTube (opens in a new tab)
  • Telegram (opens in a new tab)

HOL Guard

  • What is HOL Guard
  • Features
  • Cut coding agent token costs (CIGAR)
  • Install Guard
  • Download the desktop app
  • Pricing
  • Guard for teams
  • Compare Guard
  • Release notes

Guard for your AI tool

  • Guard for Claude Code
  • Guard for Codex
  • Guard for Cursor
  • Guard for GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Guard for OpenCode
  • Guard for Pi and Oh My Pi
  • Guard for Hermes
  • Guard for OpenClaw
  • All supported AI tools

Research and security

  • Gauntlet: Guard tested with real agents
  • CIGAR token benchmark
  • Research
  • AI security hub
  • Security advisories
  • Active CVEs in AI tools
  • AI agent security guides
  • Extensions and coverage

Plugins and MCP servers

  • Browse AI plugins
  • New plugin launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins

AI agent registry

  • Best AI agents
  • Best ERC-8004 agents
  • Best Virtuals agents
  • Best A2A agents
  • Best x402 payable agents
  • Submit an ERC-8004 contract
  • Feature your agent

Developers

  • Guard docs
  • Documentation index
  • Developer hub
  • Registry API reference
  • OpenAPI spec
  • Registry OpenAPI spec
  • Run in Postman (opens in a new tab)
  • HCS standards

Company

  • About HOL
  • Blog
  • Contribute to HOL
  • Guard contributors
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Affiliate program
  • Contact

Copyright ยฉ 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Back to active CVEs
High ยท CVSS 7.5CVE-2026-126080GHSA-8474-XRP6-WH69

Active Support: Possible DoS vulnerability in Active Support safe_constantizeCVE-2026-126080

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-126080 records a High severity (CVSS 7.5) vulnerability in Active Support: Possible DoS vulnerability in Active Support safe_constantize. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps activesupport (rubygems), activesupport (rubygems). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Nov 10, 2026Updated Nov 10, 2026Source checked Nov 10, 2026First seen by HOL Nov 10, 2026Material review Nov 10, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
High ยท CVSS 7.5
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
2 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 7.5. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps activesupport (rubygems), activesupport (rubygems). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
activesupportrubygems>=8.1.0.beta1,<8.1.4.18.1.4.1
activesupportrubygems<8.0.5.28.0.5.2

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for activesupport, activesupport.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update activesupport to 8.1.4.1; activesupport to 8.0.5.2 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Nov 10, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Nov 10, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Nov 10, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
Upstream source description

### Impact When constant lookup raises `LoadError`, `ActiveSupport::Inflector#safe_constantize` (and `String#safe_constantize`) builds a regular expression from the requested constant name without escaping it, so a caller that passes untrusted input lets the attacker choose the source of a pattern that the application compiles. Crafted patterns can trigger defects in Ruby's regular expression compiler, possibly leading to a crash of the server process, and repeated requests could keep the application unavailable. Action Cable passes the `channel` value of each `subscribe` command to `safe_constantize` before any channel lookup, so in the default configuration an unauthenticated client of the Action Cable endpoint can reach this code. ### Details The check that decides whether `safe_constantize` returns `nil` or re-raises the `LoadError` now matches the first segment of the constant name against the error message as a literal string, and no longer compiles a regular expression. It returns the same result as before for constant names that contain no regular expression syntax. ### Affected applications An application is affected if it meets all of these requirements: - Mounts Action Cable, which a new Rails application does by default at `/cable` (`config.action_cable.mount_path`), or otherwise passes untrusted input to `safe_constantize`. - Accepts Action Cable connections from untrusted clients. `ApplicationCable::Connection#connect` authenticates nobody unless the application adds a check. ### Workarounds Applications that do not use Action Cable can set `config.action_cable.mount_path = nil` to remove the endpoint. Applications that use Action Cable can call `reject_unauthorized_connection` in `ApplicationCable::Connection#connect` for unauthenticated clients, which limits exposure to authenticated users but does not remove it. ### Releases The fixed releases are available at the normal locations. Patches for those who cannot upgrade at once: - 8.1: https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/95aa9e416016524956d4904fed96eaed079580bb.patch - 8.0: https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/210ac22d446c8e2625b091e79256806b836eee20.patch ### Versions affected - activesupport < 8.0.5.2 - activesupport >= 8.1, < 8.1.4.1 ### Credit This issue was responsibly reported by Felix Tscheulin ([flixt](https://hackerone.com/flixt)) through HackerOne researcher [scheja](https://hackerone.com/scheja), and independently by Bucky Wolfe ([Igneous](https://github.com/Igneous)), who provided a proof of concept that crashes the server. It was also found by the Anthropic OSS Scanner (ANT-2026-ZUN5KU3Q).

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Related CVEs

  • Active Support: Possible XSS vulnerability in Active Support MessagePack serializerSame activesupport package
  • Active Storage: Possible DoS vulnerability in Active Storage filename handlingSame rubygems ecosystem
  • Action Pack: Possible restoration of destroyed sessions in Action Dispatch CacheStoreSame rubygems ecosystem
  • Action Pack: Possible IP spoofing in Action Dispatch RemoteIpSame rubygems ecosystem
  • Active Storage: Possible circumvention of file size limits in Active Storage direct uploads to Google Cloud StorageSame rubygems ecosystem
  • Active Storage: Possible arbitrary file read and remote code execution in Active Storage video previews, analysis and image processingSame rubygems ecosystem

Record context

Vulnerability class
Missing Auth
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-74
Source
GitHub Security Advisories
Source checked
Nov 10, 2026
References
7 linked sources
Open source record