HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 12726 awx automation controller awx github webhook
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Contribute to HOL
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Affiliate program
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
Medium · CVSS 6.3CVE-2026-12726

Awx: automation-controller: awx: github webhook second-order ssrf via unvalidated statuses_url exfiltrates pat credentialCVE-2026-12726

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-12726 records a Medium severity (CVSS 6.3) vulnerability in Awx: automation-controller: awx: github webhook second-order ssrf via unvalidated statuses_url exfiltrates pat credential. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps Red Hat/ansible-automation-platform-26/controller-rhel9 (generic), Red Hat/ansible-automation-platform-27/controller-rhel9 (generic), Red Hat/automation-controller (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Jun 19, 2026Updated Nov 5, 2026Source checked Nov 5, 2026First seen by HOL Jun 19, 2026Material review Nov 5, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
Medium · CVSS 6.3
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
3 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Not reported

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 6.3. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps Red Hat/ansible-automation-platform-26/controller-rhel9 (generic), Red Hat/ansible-automation-platform-27/controller-rhel9 (generic), Red Hat/automation-controller (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
Red Hat/ansible-automation-platform-26/controller-rhel9generic*Not reported
Red Hat/ansible-automation-platform-27/controller-rhel9generic*Not reported
Red Hat/automation-controllergeneric*Not reported

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for Red Hat/ansible-automation-platform-26/controller-rhel9, Red Hat/ansible-automation-platform-27/controller-rhel9, Red Hat/automation-controller.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Source-reported workaround: The following practices may reduce exposure to this flaw until a fix is available: 1. Restrict network access to controller webhook endpoints so only trusted GitHub egress IPs or an approved reverse proxy can reach them. 2. Protect job template webhook keys as secrets; restrict Job Template admin access; rotate webhook keys if compromise is suspected. 3. If commit status callback to GitHub is not required, configure GitHub webhooks without a webhook_credential on the job template (this disables PAT transmission on job completion). 4. Monitor controller logs and outbound connections for unexpected callback destinations following webhook-triggered jobs.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Jun 19, 2026

    Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:record

  2. Source modified

    Nov 5, 2026

    Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:record

  3. First seen by HOL

    Jun 19, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referencebugzilla.redhat.com
Upstream source description

A flaw was found in the AWX GitHub webhook integration. When processing GitHub pull_request webhooks, the controller stores the pull_request.statuses_url value from the webhook payload without validating that it points to a trusted GitHub API endpoint. If a job template is configured with a GitHub Personal Access Token as its webhook credential, the controller later POSTs that token to the stored callback URL when posting job status updates. An attacker who can submit a correctly signed forged webhook using the job template's webhook_key can redirect the callback to an attacker-controlled URL and exfiltrate the configured GitHub PAT.

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Related CVEs

  • KurrentDB: Privileged access to read $all enables arbitrary file read and GET-only SSRFAlso CWE-918
  • Kubeflow Pipelines: Unauthenticated SSRF vulnerability in Kubeflow Pipelines TensorBoard proxyAlso CWE-918
  • Kubeflow Pipelines: Unauthenticated server-side request forgery in the frontend http/https artifact source via decimal-IP bypass of the bucket validatorAlso CWE-918
  • Kubeflow Pipelines: Unauthenticated SSRF through artifact provider endpointsAlso CWE-918
  • Kubeflow Pipelines — API server fetches a caller-supplied pipelineURL without host validationAlso CWE-918

Record context

Vulnerability class
SSRF
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-918
Source
CVE List V5
Source checked
Nov 5, 2026
References
2 linked sources
Open source record