HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Gemini CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorKeep agent security open: sponsor a project, place a banner, or fund a security initiative.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 17508 password based kdf cost parameters honoured
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Plugins
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
Medium · CVSS 5.3CVE-2026-17508

Password-based KDF cost parameters honoured unbounded from untrusted input across the remaining PBE entry points

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-17508 records a Medium severity (CVSS 5.3) vulnerability in Password-based KDF cost parameters honoured unbounded from untrusted input across the remaining PBE entry points. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc./bcpkix (generic), Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc./bcpkix-fips (generic), Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc./bcpkix-lts8on (generic), Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc./bcprov (generic) and additional mapped packages. Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Oct 2, 2026Updated Oct 2, 2026Source checked Oct 2, 2026First seen by HOL Oct 2, 2026Material review Oct 2, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
Medium · CVSS 5.3
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
5 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 5.3. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc./bcpkix (generic), Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc./bcpkix-fips (generic), Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc./bcpkix-lts8on (generic), Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc./bcprov (generic) and additional mapped packages. Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc./bcpkixgeneric>=0 <1.861.86
Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc./bcpkix-fipsgeneric>=1.0.0 <1.0.13 || >=2.0.0 <2.0.13 || >=2.1.0 <2.1.131.0.13, 2.0.13, 2.1.13
Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc./bcpkix-lts8ongeneric>=2.73.0 <2.73.132.73.13
Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc./bcprovgeneric>=0 <1.861.86
Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc./bcprov-lts8ongeneric>=2.73.0 <2.73.132.73.13

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc./bcpkix, Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc./bcpkix-fips, Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc./bcpkix-lts8on.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc./bcpkix to 1.86; Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc./bcpkix-fips to 1.0.13; Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc./bcpkix-lts8on to 2.73.13; Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc./bcprov to 1.86; Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc./bcprov-lts8on to 2.73.13 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Oct 2, 2026

    Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Oct 2, 2026

    Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Oct 2, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
Upstream source description

In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, several password-based key derivation entry points ran the KDF with cost parameters taken from the untrusted input being processed, without bounding them, so a small input could dictate an arbitrary amount of work before any password or integrity check could reject it. The affected paths are the RFC 9579 PBMAC1 MAC calculator builders, which took the PBKDF2 iteration count and derived-key length straight out of PBMAC1Params (JcePBMac1CalculatorBuilder, and PKCS12PBEUtils.createPBMac1Calculator reached from PKCS12PfxPdu.isMacValid); the scrypt parallelization parameter p in the PKCS#8 and PKCS#12 cost guards, which bounded only the cost parameter N and the block size r even though the scratch buffer scales with r times p, so the configured memory ceiling could be evaded entirely; the raw JCA PBKDF2 provider (org.bouncycastle.jcajce.provider.symmetric.PBEPBKDF2); and the bcrypt round count read from an encrypted OpenSSH v1 private key's own kdfoptions. Each now bounds the parameter before deriving, in line with the caps already applied elsewhere in the tree, with the OpenSSH round count configurable through the new org.bouncycastle.openssh.max_rounds property. This completes the bounding begun in 1.85 for the PKCS#8 / PBES2 decryptors (CVE-2026-15055). This issue also affects Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.13, and Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS (BC-FJA) before bcpkix-fips 1.0.13 (1.0.X series), 2.0.13 (2.0.X series) and 2.1.13 (2.1.X series).

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Related CVEs

  • NTRU leaks private key information by reducing secret values with a non-constant-time integer divisionSame legion of the bouncy castle inc./bcprov package
  • Apache Thrift: Lua `TBinaryProtocol:readMessageBegin` bypasses `checkStringSize` on the pre-versioned nameAlso CWE-770
  • Apache Thrift: Java `TSaslNonblockingServer`: residual of CVE-2026-61373 (thread-death black hole + no cross-connection budget)Also CWE-770
  • Kubio AI Page Builder <= 2.9.2 - Unauthenticated Stored Cross-Site Scripting via SVG Comment Content (KSES Allowlist Bypass)Same generic ecosystem
  • Download Monitor <= 5.2.10 - Unauthenticated Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Cross-Origin postMessage to Admin EditorSame generic ecosystem
  • Otter Blocks <= 3.2.6 - Authenticated (Subscriber+) Sensitive Information Exposure in Form Submissions Dashboard WidgetSame generic ecosystem

Record context

Vulnerability class
Vulnerability
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-770
Source
CVE List V5
Source checked
Oct 2, 2026
References
7 linked sources
Open source record