HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 18329 nginx ngxhttpjsmodule vulnerability
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
High · CVSS 8.2CVE-2026-18329

NGINX ngx_http_js_module vulnerabilityCVE-2026-18329

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-18329 records a High severity (CVSS 8.2) vulnerability in NGINX ngx_http_js_module vulnerability. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps F5/NGINX JavaScript (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Sep 2, 2026Updated Sep 3, 2026Source checked Oct 17, 2026First seen by HOL Sep 2, 2026Material review Sep 3, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
High · CVSS 8.2
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
1 mapped package or product
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 8.2. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps F5/NGINX JavaScript (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
F5/NGINX JavaScriptgeneric>=1.0.0 <1.0.1 || >=0.9.9 <*1.0.1, *

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for F5/NGINX JavaScript.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Source-reported workaround: * To secure your NGINX njs js_access handler against unhandled exceptions such as JSON.parse failures, wrap your logic in a robust try/catch block with a default strict deny policy that returns an HTML 403 Forbidden response code. For example:async function auth(r) {   try {     // 1. Guard input: Safely check for the Authorization header     var authHeader = r.headersIn ? r.headersIn.Authorization : undefined;     if (!authHeader) {       r.warn("Access Denied: Missing Authorization header.");       return r.return(401);     }     // 2. Perform the async HTTP request     let reply = await ngx.fetch(' http://authsvc/check ', {       headers: { Authorization: authHeader }     });     // 3. Validate response status     if (reply.status !== 200) {       r.warn(`Access Denied: Auth service returned status ${reply.status}`);       return r.return(401);     }     // 4. Read response body     // Note: ngx.fetch body is read asynchronously using .text() or .json()     let responseText = await reply.text();     let payload = {};     // 5. Guard JSON.parse explicitly     try {       payload = JSON.parse(responseText);     } catch (jsonError) {       r.error(`Security Warning: Failed to parse auth service JSON payload: ${jsonError.message}`);       // Explicitly deny the request due to malformed auth response payload       return r.return(403);     }     // 6. Validate the contents of the parsed JSON     if (payload.authorized !== true) {       r.warn("Access Denied: Client token validated but not authorized.");       return r.return(403);     }     // 7. Success: Explicitly allow the request to proceed     return r.return(200);   } catch (globalError) {     // 8. Global Catch-All: Block the bypass vulnerability on any script exception     r.error(`Security Critical: Unhandled exception in auth handler: ${globalError.toString()}`);     // Always return 403 (Deny) on exception to guarantee a fail-closed state.     return r.return(403);   } } export default { auth }; * Place a security enforcement layer such as F5 WAF for NGINX or BIG-IP Advanced WAF before NGINX njs to prevent malformed requests. Configure the WAF to do the following: * Validate JSON syntax Enforce request body limits Block malformed payloads * Reject unexpected content types Apply API schema validation

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Sep 2, 2026

    Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Sep 3, 2026

    Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Sep 2, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • Source referencemy.f5.com
Upstream source description

Description NGINX JavaScript (njs) and QuickJS (qjs) engines have a vulnerability when a js_access handler performs asynchronous request body processing and an exception is thrown during asynchronous access-control evaluation before an explicit access denial is returned. An unauthenticated attacker can exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request that triggers an error condition in the access validation logic. This may cause the js_access phase to fail open, allowing the request to proceed instead of being denied, resulting in an authentication or authorization bypass and unauthorized access to protected resources. Impact This vulnerability may allow remote attackers to bypass js_access controls. There is no control plane exposure; this is a data plane issue only. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Related CVEs

  • WordPress SMS Alert Order Notifications plugin <= 4.0.1 - Broken Access Control vulnerabilitySame generic ecosystem
  • phpMyFAQ 3.2.0-alpha before 4.1.9 and 4.2.0-alpha before 4.2.0-beta TOTP 2FA Bypass via SSO CallbacksSame generic ecosystem
  • phpMyFAQ before 4.1.9 and 4.2.0-alpha before 4.2.0-beta Missing Current-Password Step-Up on E-mail Change Enables Account TakeoverSame generic ecosystem
  • phpMyFAQ 4.2.0-alpha before 4.2.0-beta Missing Authorization via deleteGroup APISame generic ecosystem
  • phpMyFAQ 4.2.0-alpha.2 before 4.2.0-beta 2FA Brute-Force via remove-twofactor EndpointSame generic ecosystem
  • phpMyFAQ before 4.1.9 and 4.2.0-alpha before 4.2.0-beta Account Enumeration via Guest Comment EndpointSame generic ecosystem

Record context

Vulnerability class
Missing Auth
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-636
Source
CVE List V5
Source checked
Oct 17, 2026
References
1 linked source
Open source record