HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorKeep agent security open: sponsor a project, place a banner, or fund a security initiative.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 23519 non constant time code generation on arm32 targets
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
Unknown severity · Source severity not reportedCVE-2026-23519GHSA-2GQC-6J2Q-83QP

Non-constant-time code generation on ARM32 targetsCVE-2026-23519

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-23519 records a Unknown severity vulnerability in Non-constant-time code generation on ARM32 targets. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps cmov (crates.io). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Jan 14, 2026Updated Oct 12, 2026Source checked Oct 12, 2026First seen by HOL Oct 12, 2026Material review Oct 12, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
Unknown severitySource severity not reported
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
1 mapped package or product
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

A CVSS score is not reported in the current record. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps cmov (crates.io). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
cmovcrates.io>=0.0.0-0 <0.4.40.4.4

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for cmov.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update cmov to 0.4.4 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Jan 14, 2026

    Evidence: source:osv:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Oct 12, 2026

    Evidence: source:osv:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Oct 12, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • Source referencecrates.io
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • Source referencerustsec.org
Upstream source description

## Summary While the `cmov` crate has a special backend for `aarch64` which uses special CSEL instructions, on 32-bit ARM it uses a portable pure Rust fallback implementation. This implementation uses a combination of bitwise arithmetic and `core::hint::black_box` to attempt to coerce constant-time code generation out of the optimizer, but the implementation in v0.4.3 and earlier failed to do this on 32-bit ARM targets. ## Impact Branch instructions inserted by the LLVM optimizer on 32-bit targets can be leveraged using various microarchitectural sidechannels like cache timing attacks to learn secret information that `cmov` is designed to protect. ## Details The following assembly was emitted when using `Cmov::cmovnz`, a function which implements a conditional move when a provided value is non-zero: ```asm bne .LBB0_2 mvns r3, r3 ``` This includes a branch instruction `bne`: Branch if Not Equal. ## PoC The following code reproduces the issue: ```rust #![no_std] use cmov::Cmov; #[inline(never)] pub fn test_ct_cmov(a: &mut u8, b: u8, c: u8) { a.cmovnz(&b, c); } ``` ## Resolution `cmov` v0.4.4 includes a portable `black_box`-based tactical mitigation for the issue which coerced the compiler into producing the expected codegen, and additionally v0.4.5 added an `asm!` reimplementation of the problematic mask generation function for ARM32 targets which should guarantee that particular function never contains a branch on such targets.

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Record context

Vulnerability class
Secret Exfiltration
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
Not reported
Source
OSV
Source checked
Oct 12, 2026
References
3 linked sources
Open source record