Answer in brief
CVE-2026-32690 records a Low severity (CVSS 3.7) vulnerability in Apache Airflow: 3.x - Nested Variable Secret Values Bypass Redaction via max_depth=1. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps Apache Software Foundation/apache-airflow-core (generic), apache-airflow (pip), apache-airflow-core (pip). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
Analysis pending evidence review
HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.
CVSS is 3.7. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.
Analysis status
Analysis pending evidence review
Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.
The current feed maps Apache Software Foundation/apache-airflow-core (generic), apache-airflow (pip), apache-airflow-core (pip). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
| Product | Affected versions | Fixed versions |
|---|---|---|
| cpe:2.3:a:apache:airflow:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* | Not reported | Not reported |
| Package | Affected range | Fixed version |
|---|---|---|
| Apache Software Foundation/apache-airflow-coregeneric | >=3.0.0 <3.2.0 | 3.2.0 |
| apache-airflowpip | >=3.0.0,<3.2.0 | 3.2.0 |
| apache-airflow-corepip | >=3.0.0,<3.2.0 | 3.2.0 |
Published upstream
Apr 18, 2026
Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:recordSource modified
Nov 3, 2026
Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:recordFirst seen by HOL
Jun 11, 2026
Secrets in Variables saved as JSON dictionaries were not properly redacted - in case thee variables were retrieved by the user the secrets stored as nested fields were not masked. If you do not store variables with sensitive values in JSON form, you are not affected. Otherwise please upgrade to Apache Airflow 3.2.0 that has the fix implemented
Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.