HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.
  • CIGARPoint your coding agent at the right lines and cut its token bill by about a third.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.
  • Gauntlet benchmarkGuard tested with real coding agents: safe work runs, risky actions stop.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 40076 openmrs module upload vulnerable to path
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard

Get HOL Guard for your computer

HOL Guard is a free desktop app that watches what coding agents such as Claude Code, Codex and Cursor run, read and install, and asks you before anything risky happens.

  • Download for macOS
  • Windows download
  • Linux download

Free. macOS 13+ on Apple silicon, Windows x64, Linux AppImage. Other ways to install

Star HOL Guard on GitHub to download
Runs on
macOS 13 or later on Apple silicon, Windows x64 and Linux x86_64.
Price
Free. Paid plans add Guard Cloud for teams. See pricing
Where your data stays
On your computer. Guard Cloud is optional.
Token savings
33% to 38% lower spend across three coding agents in our CIGAR benchmark.

HOL

HOL builds open infrastructure for AI agents: HOL Guard, a directory of AI plugins and MCP servers, an AI agent registry and the open HCS standards.

  • GitHub (opens in a new tab)
  • X (Twitter) (opens in a new tab)
  • YouTube (opens in a new tab)
  • Telegram (opens in a new tab)

HOL Guard

  • What is HOL Guard
  • Features
  • Cut coding agent token costs (CIGAR)
  • Install Guard
  • Download the desktop app
  • Pricing
  • Guard for teams
  • Compare Guard
  • Release notes

Guard for your AI tool

  • Guard for Claude Code
  • Guard for Codex
  • Guard for Cursor
  • Guard for GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Guard for OpenCode
  • Guard for Pi and Oh My Pi
  • Guard for Hermes
  • Guard for OpenClaw
  • All supported AI tools

Research and security

  • Gauntlet: Guard tested with real agents
  • CIGAR token benchmark
  • Research
  • AI security hub
  • Security advisories
  • Active CVEs in AI tools
  • AI agent security guides
  • Extensions and coverage

Plugins and MCP servers

  • Browse AI plugins
  • New plugin launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins

AI agent registry

  • Best AI agents
  • Best ERC-8004 agents
  • Best Virtuals agents
  • Best A2A agents
  • Best x402 payable agents
  • Submit an ERC-8004 contract
  • Feature your agent

Developers

  • Guard docs
  • Documentation index
  • Developer hub
  • Registry API reference
  • OpenAPI spec
  • Registry OpenAPI spec
  • Run in Postman (opens in a new tab)
  • HCS standards

Company

  • About HOL
  • Blog
  • Contribute to HOL
  • Guard contributors
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Affiliate program
  • Contact

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Back to active CVEs
Critical · CVSS 8.8CVE-2026-40076GHSA-78FC-9688-W8XW

OpenMRS Module Upload Vulnerable to Path Traversal (Zip Slip)CVE-2026-40076

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-40076 records a Critical severity (CVSS 8.8) vulnerability in OpenMRS Module Upload Vulnerable to Path Traversal (Zip Slip). The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps org.openmrs.web:openmrs-web (maven), org.openmrs.web:openmrs-web (maven). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published May 4, 2026Updated Nov 12, 2026Source checked Nov 12, 2026First seen by HOL Oct 28, 2026Material review Nov 12, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
Critical · CVSS 8.8
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
3 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Not reported

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 8.8. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps org.openmrs.web:openmrs-web (maven), org.openmrs.web:openmrs-web (maven). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Affected products and reported versions
ProductAffected versionsFixed versions
cpe:2.3:a:openmrs:openmrs:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*Not reportedNot reported
Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
org.openmrs.web:openmrs-webmaven<=2.7.8Not reported
org.openmrs.web:openmrs-webmaven>=2.8.0,<=2.8.5Not reported

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for org.openmrs.web:openmrs-web, org.openmrs.web:openmrs-web.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Monitor this advisory for an available fix and review any installs of the affected package.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    May 4, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Nov 12, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Oct 28, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • NVD vulnerability recordnvd.nist.gov
Upstream source description

## Affected Versions version ≤ 2.7.8 (latest version at time of disclosure) https://github.com/openmrs/openmrs-core ## Impact The endpoint `POST /openmrs/ws/rest/v1/module` is vulnerable to a path traversal (Zip Slip) attack. An authenticated attacker can upload a crafted `.omod` archive containing ZIP entries with directory traversal sequences. Upon automatic extraction by the server, the incomplete path validation in `WebModuleUtil.startModule()` fails to prevent entries such as `web/module/../../../../malicious.jsp` from being written outside the intended module directory. If the traversal target falls within the web application root (e.g., `/usr/local/tomcat/webapps/openmrs/`), the attacker achieves arbitrary file write and subsequent Remote Code Execution. Notably, other extraction methods in the same codebase (`ModuleUtil.expandJar()`, `TestInstallUtil.addZippedTestModules()`) are properly protected with `normalize().startsWith()` checks — this vulnerability is an oversight where the same fix was not applied. Furthermore, the `module.allow_web_admin` runtime property, which is intended to restrict administrators from managing modules via the web interface, only gates the Legacy UI controller entry point. The REST API endpoint `POST /openmrs/ws/rest/v1/module` does not check this property, allowing this restriction to be fully bypassed. ## Steps to Reproduce 1. Construct a malicious `.omod` file (which is a ZIP/JAR archive) containing a ZIP entry with a path traversal payload in its entry name, such as `web/module/../../../../<target_filename>`. Upload this file to `POST /openmrs/ws/rest/v1/module` with valid admin credentials via Basic Auth. <img width="1986" height="1102" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/647f15de-7e8c-40b9-aba9-d4db5d2e0b52" /> <img width="2048" height="1078" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/301412a0-e3b0-4afb-91c2-e9739de3080d" /> 2. The server parses and loads the module. During `WebModuleUtil.startModule()`, entries under `web/module/` are automatically extracted. The existing check `Paths.get(name).startsWith("..")` only blocks entries beginning with `..`, so an entry starting with `web/module/` passes the check. The `../` sequences in the remaining path cause the file to be written outside the intended `WEB-INF/view/module/` directory — for example, into the web application root at `/usr/local/tomcat/webapps/openmrs/`. <img width="1439" height="141" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4bda3b1e-a80e-42ed-af2b-a1da53e8db03" /> 3. The traversed file is now accessible under the web application root. If the written file is a JSP script, accessing it via the browser triggers server-side execution, achieving RCE. <img width="1482" height="300" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/61936002-78cd-4203-80f0-f0a8702b216c" /> ## Root Cause Analysis The vulnerability exists in `WebModuleUtil.startModule()` (`web/src/main/java/org/openmrs/module/web/WebModuleUtil.java`). ### Vulnerable code: ```java Enumeration<JarEntry> entries = jarFile.entries(); while (entries.hasMoreElements()) { JarEntry entry = entries.nextElement(); String name = entry.getName(); // ❌ Incomplete check — only blocks entries starting with ".." if (Paths.get(name).startsWith("..")) { throw new UnsupportedOperationException("..."); } if (name.startsWith("web/module/")) { String filepath = name.substring(11); StringBuilder absPath = new StringBuilder(realPath + "/WEB-INF"); absPath.append("/view/module/"); absPath.append(mod.getModuleIdAsPath()).append("/").append(filepath); // ❌ No normalize() or startsWith() boundary check before writing File outFile = new File(absPath.toString().replace("/", File.separator)); outStream = new FileOutputStream(outFile, false); inStream = jarFile.getInputStream(entry); OpenmrsUtil.copyFile(inStream, outStream); } } ``` **Why the check fails:** For an entry named `web/module/foo/../../../../evil.jsp`, `Paths.get(name)` starts with `web`, not `..`, so the check passes. After `name.substring(11)`, the filepath `foo/../../../../evil.jsp` is concatenated directly into the output path without normalization, resulting in a write outside the intended directory. ### Correctly protected code in the same codebase: **`ModuleUtil.expandJar()`:** ```java // ✅ Correct — uses normalize().startsWith() if (!parent.toPath().normalize().startsWith(docBase)) { throw new UnsupportedOperationException("..."); } ``` **`TestInstallUtil.addZippedTestModules()`:** ```java // ✅ Correct — uses normalize().startsWith() if (!zipEntryFile.toPath().normalize().startsWith(moduleRepository.toPath().normalize())) { throw new IOException("Bad zip entry"); } ``` The fix pattern is already known and applied elsewhere in the codebase. `WebModuleUtil.startModule()` is an oversight. ### Bypass of `module.allow_web_admin` The `module.allow_web_admin` property only restricts module operations at the Legacy UI layer (`ModuleListController`). The REST API endpoint does not consult this property: ``` Legacy UI: POST /admin/modules/moduleList.form → allowAdmin() check → [BLOCKED] REST API: POST /ws/rest/v1/module → No allowAdmin() check → [ALLOWED] ↓ ModuleFactory.loadModule() ↓ WebModuleUtil.startModule() ← Zip Slip here, no allowAdmin check ↓ FileOutputStream.write() ← Arbitrary file write ``` ## Remediation Add `normalize().startsWith()` boundary validation before writing, consistent with the existing pattern in `ModuleUtil.expandJar()`: ```java File outFile = new File(absPath.toString().replace("/", File.separator)); // ✅ Add this check if (!outFile.toPath().normalize().startsWith( Paths.get(realPath, "WEB-INF").normalize())) { throw new UnsupportedOperationException( "Zip entry '" + name + "' would be written outside the allowed directory."); } ``` Additionally, enforce the `module.allow_web_admin` restriction consistently across all module upload entry points, including the REST API.

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Related CVEs

  • Elasticsearch data source resource proxy allows arbitrary methods and paths with the data source's credentialsAlso CWE-22
  • MLflow < 3.18.0 Path Traversal via model_id in log_outputs APIAlso CWE-22

Record context

Vulnerability class
Path Traversal
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-22
Source
GitHub Security Advisories
Source checked
Nov 12, 2026
References
3 linked sources
Open source record