### Summary `EmlParser.get_raw_body_text()` recurses unconditionally for every nested `message/rfc822` attachment without any depth limit. An attacker who can supply a badly crafted EML file with approximately 120 nested `message/rfc822` parts triggers an unhandled `RecursionError` and aborts parsing of the message. A 12 KB EML file is enough to crash a worker. Though this causes the parser to crash, it is an unlikely scenario as the suggested EML that crashes the parser would not pass basic RFC compliance tests. ### Details The vulnerable function is `EmlParser.get_raw_body_text()` in `eml_parser/parser.py`. For every part of type `multipart/*`, the function iterates over its sub-parts; for every sub-part of type `message/rfc822`, it calls itself recursively on the inner message: There is no depth parameter and no early-abort. CPython's default `sys.recursionlimit` is 1000. Each level of `message/rfc822` nesting adds approximately 8 frames to the stack (parser code + stdlib `_header_value_parser` calls), so roughly 120 nested levels exhaust the limit. The `RecursionError` is not caught anywhere along the call chain, so it propagates out of `decode_email_bytes()` and aborts processing of the entire message. ### PoC Environment: Python 3.12.3, eml_parser 3.0.0 (`pip install eml_parser==3.0.0`), default `sys.recursionlimit=1000`, Ubuntu 24.04 aarch64. No special configuration of `EmlParser`, default constructor. Self-contained reproducer that builds the PoC and triggers the crash: ```python import eml_parser def build_poc(depth=124): inner = b"From: a@a\r\nTo: b@b\r\nContent-Type: text/plain\r\n\r\n.\r\n" msg = inner for i in range(depth): b = f"B{i}".encode() msg = ( b'Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="' + b + b'"\r\n\r\n' b'--' + b + b'\r\nContent-Type: message/rfc822\r\n\r\n' ) + msg + b'\r\n--' + b + b'--\r\n' return msg ep = eml_parser.EmlParser() ep.decode_email_bytes(build_poc()) # RecursionError after ~76 ms on Apple Silicon (Ubuntu 24.04 aarch64). ``` Note that the suggested code does not produce an RFC compliant message. Resulting EML payload size: 12,369 bytes. SHA-256 of generated PoC: `00f15f635e21b4144967c2893b37425e6a6bd7b4185c557e5c7e904e1e6d18e8` The crash is deterministic on a stock install. No network, no special headers, no large attachments. ### Impact Denial of service of any pipeline that processes attacker-supplied EML files using `eml_parser`. A single 12 KB email is enough to crash a worker. If the worker is a long-running process triaging multiple emails, the unhandled exception aborts processing of the whole batch unless the caller wraps the call in a broad `try/except`. Even then, attacker-supplied volume can keep workers in a perpetual restart loop. The vulnerability is exploitable pre-authentication in any deployment that ingests emails from external senders which have not been subject to any kind of basic validation. Considering that email messages pass through a mail-server which does some kind of validation, messages as produced by the *build_poc* function would not reach eml_parser. Nonetheless recursion depth checks have been implemented to handle the described issue. ### Reporter Sebastián Alba Vives (`@Sebasteuo`) Independent security researcher, Senior AppSec Consultant LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/sebastian-alba Email: [email protected] PGP: `0D1A E4C2 CFC8 894F 19EA DA24 45CD CA33 2CF8 31F4`
### Summary `EmlParser.get_raw_body_text()` recurses unconditionally for every nested `message/rfc822` attachment without any depth limit. An attacker who can supply a badly crafted EML file with approximately 120 nested `message/rfc822` parts triggers an unhandled `RecursionError` and aborts parsing of the message. A 12 KB EML file is enough to crash a worker. Though this causes the parser to crash, it is an unlikely scenario as the suggested EML that crashes the parser would not pass basic RFC compliance tests. ### Details The vulnerable function is `EmlParser.get_raw_body_text()` in `eml_parser/parser.py`. For every part of type `multipart/*`, the function iterates over its sub-parts; for every sub-part of type `message/rfc822`, it calls itself recursively on the inner message: There is no depth parameter and no early-abort. CPython's default `sys.recursionlimit` is 1000. Each level of `message/rfc822` nesting adds approximately 8 frames to the stack (parser code + stdlib `_header_value_parser` calls), so roughly 120 nested levels exhaust the limit. The `RecursionError` is not caught anywhere along the call chain, so it propagates out of `decode_email_bytes()` and aborts processing of the entire message. ### PoC Environment: Python 3.12.3, eml_parser 3.0.0 (`pip install eml_parser==3.0.0`), default `sys.recursionlimit=1000`, Ubuntu 24.04 aarch64. No special configuration of `EmlParser`, default constructor. Self-contained reproducer that builds the PoC and triggers the crash: ```python import eml_parser def build_poc(depth=124): inner = b"From: a@a\r\nTo: b@b\r\nContent-Type: text/plain\r\n\r\n.\r\n" msg = inner for i in range(depth): b = f"B{i}".encode() msg = ( b'Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="' + b + b'"\r\n\r\n' b'--' + b + b'\r\nContent-Type: message/rfc822\r\n\r\n' ) + msg + b'\r\n--' + b + b'--\r\n' return msg ep = eml_parser.EmlParser() ep.decode_email_bytes(build_poc()) # RecursionError after ~76 ms on Apple Silicon (Ubuntu 24.04 aarch64). ``` Note that the suggested code does not produce an RFC compliant message. Resulting EML payload size: 12,369 bytes. SHA-256 of generated PoC: `00f15f635e21b4144967c2893b37425e6a6bd7b4185c557e5c7e904e1e6d18e8` The crash is deterministic on a stock install. No network, no special headers, no large attachments. ### Impact Denial of service of any pipeline that processes attacker-supplied EML files using `eml_parser`. A single 12 KB email is enough to crash a worker. If the worker is a long-running process triaging multiple emails, the unhandled exception aborts processing of the whole batch unless the caller wraps the call in a broad `try/except`. Even then, attacker-supplied volume can keep workers in a perpetual restart loop. The vulnerability is exploitable pre-authentication in any deployment that ingests emails from external senders which have not been subject to any kind of basic validation. Considering that email messages pass through a mail-server which does some kind of validation, messages as produced by the *build_poc* function would not reach eml_parser. Nonetheless recursion depth checks have been implemented to handle the described issue. ### Reporter Sebastián Alba Vives (`@Sebasteuo`) Independent security researcher, Senior AppSec Consultant LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/sebastian-alba Email: [email protected] PGP: `0D1A E4C2 CFC8 894F 19EA DA24 45CD CA33 2CF8 31F4`
Update eml_parser to 3.0.1 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.
Local check
hol-guard supply-chain scaneml_parser has recursion DoS via nested message/rfc822 attachments affects eml_parser (pip). Severity is medium. ### Summary `EmlParser.get_raw_body_text()` recurses unconditionally for every nested `message/rfc822` attachment without any depth limit. An attacker who can supply a badly crafted EML file with approximately 120 nested `message/rfc822` parts triggers an unhandled `RecursionError` and aborts parsing of the message. A 12 KB EML file is enough to crash a worker. Though this causes the parser to crash, it is an unlikely scenario as the suggested EML that crashes the parser would not pass basic RFC compliance tests. ### Details The vulnerable function is `EmlParser.get_raw_body_text()` in `eml_parser/parser.py`. For every part of type `multipart/*`, the function iterates over its sub-parts; for every sub-part of type `message/rfc822`, it calls itself recursively on the inner message: There is no depth parameter and no early-abort. CPython's default `sys.recursionlimit` is 1000. Each level of `message/rfc822` nesting adds approximately 8 frames to the stack (parser code + stdlib `_header_value_parser` calls), so roughly 120 nested levels exhaust the limit. The `RecursionError` is not caught anywhere along the call chain, so it propagates out of `decode_email_bytes()` and aborts processing of the entire message. ### PoC Environment: Python 3.12.3, eml_parser 3.0.0 (`pip install eml_parser==3.0.0`), default `sys.recursionlimit=1000`, Ubuntu 24.04 aarch64. No special configuration of `EmlParser`, default constructor. Self-contained reproducer that builds the PoC and triggers the crash: ```python import eml_parser def build_poc(depth=124): inner = b"From: a@a\r\nTo: b@b\r\nContent-Type: text/plain\r\n\r\n.\r\n" msg = inner for i in range(depth): b = f"B{i}".encode() msg = ( b'Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="' + b + b'"\r\n\r\n' b'--' + b + b'\r\nContent-Type: message/rfc822\r\n\r\n' ) + msg + b'\r\n--' + b + b'--\r\n' return msg ep = eml_parser.EmlParser() ep.decode_email_bytes(build_poc()) # RecursionError after ~76 ms on Apple Silicon (Ubuntu 24.04 aarch64). ``` Note that the suggested code does not produce an RFC compliant message. Resulting EML payload size: 12,369 bytes. SHA-256 of generated PoC: `00f15f635e21b4144967c2893b37425e6a6bd7b4185c557e5c7e904e1e6d18e8` The crash is deterministic on a stock install. No network, no special headers, no large attachments. ### Impact Denial of service of any pipeline that processes attacker-supplied EML files using `eml_parser`. A single 12 KB email is enough to crash a worker. If the worker is a long-running process triaging multiple emails, the unhandled exception aborts processing of the whole batch unless the caller wraps the call in a broad `try/except`. Even then, attacker-supplied volume can keep workers in a perpetual restart loop. The vulnerability is exploitable pre-authentication in any deployment that ingests emails from external senders which have not been subject to any kind of basic validation. Considering that email messages pass through a mail-server which does some kind of validation, messages as produced by the *build_poc* function would not reach eml_parser. Nonetheless recursion depth checks have been implemented to handle the described issue. ### Reporter Sebastián Alba Vives (`@Sebasteuo`) Independent security researcher, Senior AppSec Consultant LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/sebastian-alba Email: [email protected] PGP: `0D1A E4C2 CFC8 894F 19EA DA24 45CD CA33 2CF8 31F4`
AI coding agents often install or upgrade packages automatically in pip. A medium vulnerability in a dependency can be pulled into a project through a normal install or update without a human reviewing the change, expanding the blast radius from a single package to every agent workspace that depends on it.
| Package | Affected range | Fixed version |
|---|---|---|
| eml_parserpip | <=3.0.0 | 3.0.1 |
Fixed versions are reported by the source feed; confirm compatibility before updating.
Reported by GitHub Security Advisories (ghsa).
HOL Guard can help your team review package activity against supported protection paths.
Explore HOL GuardUpdate eml_parser to 3.0.1 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.
Local check
hol-guard supply-chain scaneml_parser has recursion DoS via nested message/rfc822 attachments affects eml_parser (pip). Severity is medium. ### Summary `EmlParser.get_raw_body_text()` recurses unconditionally for every nested `message/rfc822` attachment without any depth limit. An attacker who can supply a badly crafted EML file with approximately 120 nested `message/rfc822` parts triggers an unhandled `RecursionError` and aborts parsing of the message. A 12 KB EML file is enough to crash a worker. Though this causes the parser to crash, it is an unlikely scenario as the suggested EML that crashes the parser would not pass basic RFC compliance tests. ### Details The vulnerable function is `EmlParser.get_raw_body_text()` in `eml_parser/parser.py`. For every part of type `multipart/*`, the function iterates over its sub-parts; for every sub-part of type `message/rfc822`, it calls itself recursively on the inner message: There is no depth parameter and no early-abort. CPython's default `sys.recursionlimit` is 1000. Each level of `message/rfc822` nesting adds approximately 8 frames to the stack (parser code + stdlib `_header_value_parser` calls), so roughly 120 nested levels exhaust the limit. The `RecursionError` is not caught anywhere along the call chain, so it propagates out of `decode_email_bytes()` and aborts processing of the entire message. ### PoC Environment: Python 3.12.3, eml_parser 3.0.0 (`pip install eml_parser==3.0.0`), default `sys.recursionlimit=1000`, Ubuntu 24.04 aarch64. No special configuration of `EmlParser`, default constructor. Self-contained reproducer that builds the PoC and triggers the crash: ```python import eml_parser def build_poc(depth=124): inner = b"From: a@a\r\nTo: b@b\r\nContent-Type: text/plain\r\n\r\n.\r\n" msg = inner for i in range(depth): b = f"B{i}".encode() msg = ( b'Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="' + b + b'"\r\n\r\n' b'--' + b + b'\r\nContent-Type: message/rfc822\r\n\r\n' ) + msg + b'\r\n--' + b + b'--\r\n' return msg ep = eml_parser.EmlParser() ep.decode_email_bytes(build_poc()) # RecursionError after ~76 ms on Apple Silicon (Ubuntu 24.04 aarch64). ``` Note that the suggested code does not produce an RFC compliant message. Resulting EML payload size: 12,369 bytes. SHA-256 of generated PoC: `00f15f635e21b4144967c2893b37425e6a6bd7b4185c557e5c7e904e1e6d18e8` The crash is deterministic on a stock install. No network, no special headers, no large attachments. ### Impact Denial of service of any pipeline that processes attacker-supplied EML files using `eml_parser`. A single 12 KB email is enough to crash a worker. If the worker is a long-running process triaging multiple emails, the unhandled exception aborts processing of the whole batch unless the caller wraps the call in a broad `try/except`. Even then, attacker-supplied volume can keep workers in a perpetual restart loop. The vulnerability is exploitable pre-authentication in any deployment that ingests emails from external senders which have not been subject to any kind of basic validation. Considering that email messages pass through a mail-server which does some kind of validation, messages as produced by the *build_poc* function would not reach eml_parser. Nonetheless recursion depth checks have been implemented to handle the described issue. ### Reporter Sebastián Alba Vives (`@Sebasteuo`) Independent security researcher, Senior AppSec Consultant LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/sebastian-alba Email: [email protected] PGP: `0D1A E4C2 CFC8 894F 19EA DA24 45CD CA33 2CF8 31F4`
AI coding agents often install or upgrade packages automatically in pip. A medium vulnerability in a dependency can be pulled into a project through a normal install or update without a human reviewing the change, expanding the blast radius from a single package to every agent workspace that depends on it.
| Package | Affected range | Fixed version |
|---|---|---|
| eml_parserpip | <=3.0.0 | 3.0.1 |
Fixed versions are reported by the source feed; confirm compatibility before updating.
Reported by GitHub Security Advisories (ghsa).
HOL Guard can help your team review package activity against supported protection paths.
Explore HOL Guard