HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 45339 open webuis api key endpoint restrictions
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Contribute to HOL
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Affiliate program
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
Medium · CVSS 6.5CVE-2026-45339GHSA-57Q6-FVP4-PQMM

Open WebUI's API key endpoint restrictions bypassed via `x-api-key` header — full message processing on restricted endpointsCVE-2026-45339

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-45339 records a Medium severity (CVSS 6.5) vulnerability in Open WebUI's API key endpoint restrictions bypassed via `x-api-key` header — full message processing on restricted endpoints. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps open-webui (pip), open-webui (pypi). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published May 14, 2026Updated Nov 3, 2026Source checked Nov 3, 2026First seen by HOL Nov 3, 2026Material review Nov 3, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Record context

Vulnerability class
Missing Auth
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-863
Source
GitHub Security Advisories
Source checked
Nov 3, 2026
References
7 linked sources
Open source record

Key facts

Risk
Medium · CVSS 6.5
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
2 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 6.5. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps open-webui (pip), open-webui (pypi). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
open-webuipip<0.9.00.9.0
open-webuipypi>=0 <0.9.00.9.0

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for open-webui, open-webui.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update open-webui to 0.9.0; open-webui to 0.9.0 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    May 14, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Nov 3, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Nov 3, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • NVD vulnerability recordnvd.nist.gov
  • Source referencepypi.org
Upstream source description

### Summary Open WebUI allows admins to restrict which API endpoints an API key can access. When an API key is restricted from `/api/v1/messages`, requests using the `Authorization: Bearer sk-...` header are correctly blocked with 403. However, the same key sent via the `x-api-key` header bypasses the restriction entirely — the request is authenticated, the model is invoked, and a full response is returned. ### Details Open WebUI's Anthropic-compatible API path accepts authentication via `x-api-key` header (standard for the Anthropic API). The endpoint restriction check only applies to keys presented via the `Authorization` header. When the same `sk-...` key is supplied in `x-api-key`, the restriction check is skipped but the key is still valid for authentication. This means any API key, regardless of its configured endpoint restrictions, can access any API endpoint by simply using `x-api-key` instead of `Authorization`. ### PoC **Verified against Open WebUI v0.8.11.** **Setup:** Admin creates a user with an API key that has endpoint restrictions (not allowed on `/api/v1/messages`). A mock OpenAI-compatible model (`mock-model`) is configured. ```bash API_KEY="sk-dc56016d720e49ba9e95584d602b79bb" # Test 1: Authorization header — BLOCKED (endpoint restriction enforced) curl -s -X POST http://target:8080/api/v1/messages \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $API_KEY" \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ -d '{"model":"mock-model","messages":[{"role":"user","content":"via Authorization header"}]}' # Test 2: x-api-key header — BYPASS (same key, restriction skipped) curl -s -X POST http://target:8080/api/v1/messages \ -H "x-api-key: $API_KEY" \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ -d '{"model":"mock-model","messages":[{"role":"user","content":"via x-api-key header"}]}' ``` **Verified output:** ``` # Authorization header: {"detail":"API key not allowed to access this endpoint."} # x-api-key header (SAME key): {"id":"chatcmpl-mock","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"text","text":"MOCK-CHAT-RESPONSE"}],"model":"mock-model","usage":{"input_tokens":1,"output_tokens":1}} ``` The same API key is rejected via `Authorization` (403) but fully processed via `x-api-key` (200 with model response). ### Impact Any API key with endpoint restrictions can bypass those restrictions by using the `x-api-key` header instead of `Authorization`. This undermines the entire API key permission model: - Keys restricted from chat/completion endpoints can still send messages and receive LLM responses - Keys restricted from admin endpoints may access admin functionality - The operator's intended access control is silently ineffective - API credit spend cannot be controlled through endpoint restrictions

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Related CVEs

  • Tanium addressed an improper access controls vulnerability in Enforce.Also CWE-863
  • Tanium addressed an improper access controls vulnerability in Discover.Also CWE-863
  • Tanium addressed an improper access controls vulnerability in Discover.Also CWE-863
  • Bake filesystem path entitlements approval can be skipped in some multi-target buildsAlso CWE-863