Answer in brief
CVE-2026-45912 records a Medium severity (CVSS 5.5) vulnerability in ext4: don't cache extent during splitting extent. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
Analysis pending evidence review
HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.
CVSS is 5.5. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.
Analysis status
Analysis pending evidence review
Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.
The current feed maps Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
| Package | Affected range | Fixed version |
|---|---|---|
| Linux/Linuxgeneric | >=107a7bd31ac003e42c0f966aa8e5b26947de6024 <8302b5b4aacdbb378f7b1216bb2ee782b5142415 || >=107a7bd31ac003e42c0f966aa8e5b26947de6024 <692103feca376ae4298c92aa8828015d20f1d87b || >=107a7bd31ac003e42c0f966aa8e5b26947de6024 <4c2d9dac4d328244f9365b0a1fa27ec802821820 || >=107a7bd31ac003e42c0f966aa8e5b26947de6024 <93b2ebbbcb2e63cfc21a1946dfe91d3aa7952036 || >=107a7bd31ac003e42c0f966aa8e5b26947de6024 <96007fd3c106aea773c1afae2d6f64cceb6da208 || >=107a7bd31ac003e42c0f966aa8e5b26947de6024 <5b1f4290453314e11cd8e15c7baa8a9b76c19b23 || >=107a7bd31ac003e42c0f966aa8e5b26947de6024 <9a2b95cdaf07785e2739199037bd9c0863ccc1be || >=107a7bd31ac003e42c0f966aa8e5b26947de6024 <8b4b19a2f96348d70bfa306ef7d4a13b0bcbea79 | 8302b5b4aacdbb378f7b1216bb2ee782b5142415, 692103feca376ae4298c92aa8828015d20f1d87b, 4c2d9dac4d328244f9365b0a1fa27ec802821820, 93b2ebbbcb2e63cfc21a1946dfe91d3aa7952036, 96007fd3c106aea773c1afae2d6f64cceb6da208, 5b1f4290453314e11cd8e15c7baa8a9b76c19b23, 9a2b95cdaf07785e2739199037bd9c0863ccc1be, 8b4b19a2f96348d70bfa306ef7d4a13b0bcbea79 |
| Linux/Linuxgeneric | 3.12 | Not reported |
Published upstream
May 27, 2026
Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:recordSource modified
Jun 24, 2026
Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:recordFirst seen by HOL
Jun 24, 2026
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: don't cache extent during splitting extent Caching extents during the splitting process is risky, as it may result in stale extents remaining in the status tree. Moreover, in most cases, the corresponding extent block entries are likely already cached before the split happens, making caching here not particularly useful. Assume we have an unwritten extent, and then DIO writes the first half. [UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU] on-disk extent U: unwritten extent [UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU] extent status tree |<- ->| ----> dio write this range First, when ext4_split_extent_at() splits this extent, it truncates the existing extent and then inserts a new one. During this process, this extent status entry may be shrunk, and calls to ext4_find_extent() and ext4_cache_extents() may occur, which could potentially insert the truncated range as a hole into the extent status tree. After the split is completed, this hole is not replaced with the correct status. [UUUUUUU|UUUUUUUU] on-disk extent U: unwritten extent [UUUUUUU|HHHHHHHH] extent status tree H: hole Then, the outer calling functions will not correct this remaining hole extent either. Finally, if we perform a delayed buffer write on this latter part, it will re-insert the delayed extent and cause an error in space accounting. In adition, if the unwritten extent cache is not shrunk during the splitting, ext4_cache_extents() also conflicts with existing extents when caching extents. In the future, we will add checks when caching extents, which will trigger a warning. Therefore, Do not cache extents that are being split.
Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.