Answer in brief
CVE-2026-46319 records a High severity (CVSS 7.8) vulnerability in net/sched: act_ct: Only release RCU read lock after ct_ft. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
Analysis pending evidence review
HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.
Answer in brief
CVE-2026-46319 records a High severity (CVSS 7.8) vulnerability in net/sched: act_ct: Only release RCU read lock after ct_ft. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
Analysis pending evidence review
HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.
CVSS is 7.8. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.
Analysis status
Analysis pending evidence review
Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.
The current feed maps Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
| Package | Affected range | Fixed version |
|---|---|---|
| Linux/Linuxgeneric | >=138470a9b2cc2e26e6018300394afc3858a54e6a <ece578ca61e572df96cfc80456357ebfae0b4b9e || >=138470a9b2cc2e26e6018300394afc3858a54e6a <a2e0c045c87aa252eb61412e67dd91f2c2b19f81 || >=138470a9b2cc2e26e6018300394afc3858a54e6a <67c9ecc9f2575273ed1323e312881fc98ac83d6d || >=138470a9b2cc2e26e6018300394afc3858a54e6a <f23424a0ddadb494d4bd57056a7ca703312d3a7b || >=138470a9b2cc2e26e6018300394afc3858a54e6a <17dfb67cb399b660105d9a8c6100851c0d0cdc70 || >=138470a9b2cc2e26e6018300394afc3858a54e6a <4c727c6967a41b37efe0f26332ca9ec5b74785a3 || >=138470a9b2cc2e26e6018300394afc3858a54e6a <3e20e1b3058e0b94638e7b931c138e840e266724 || >=138470a9b2cc2e26e6018300394afc3858a54e6a <f462dca0c8415bf0058d0ffa476354c4476d0f09 | ece578ca61e572df96cfc80456357ebfae0b4b9e, a2e0c045c87aa252eb61412e67dd91f2c2b19f81, 67c9ecc9f2575273ed1323e312881fc98ac83d6d, f23424a0ddadb494d4bd57056a7ca703312d3a7b, 17dfb67cb399b660105d9a8c6100851c0d0cdc70, 4c727c6967a41b37efe0f26332ca9ec5b74785a3, 3e20e1b3058e0b94638e7b931c138e840e266724, f462dca0c8415bf0058d0ffa476354c4476d0f09 |
| Linux/Linuxgeneric | 5.7 | Not reported |
Published upstream
Jun 9, 2026
Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:recordSource modified
Aug 5, 2026
Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:recordFirst seen by HOL
Jul 7, 2026
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/sched: act_ct: Only release RCU read lock after ct_ft When looking up a flow table in act_ct in tcf_ct_flow_table_get(), rhashtable_lookup_fast() internally opens and closes an RCU read critical section before returning ct_ft. The tcf_ct_flow_table_cleanup_work() can complete before refcount_inc_not_zero() is invoked on the returned ct_ft resulting in a UAF on the already freed ct_ft object. This vulnerability can lead to privilege escalation. Analysis from [email protected]: When initializing act_ct, tcf_ct_init() is called, which internally triggers tcf_ct_flow_table_get(). static int tcf_ct_flow_table_get(struct net *net, struct tcf_ct_params *params) { struct zones_ht_key key = { .net = net, .zone = params->zone }; struct tcf_ct_flow_table *ct_ft; int err = -ENOMEM; mutex_lock(&zones_mutex); ct_ft = rhashtable_lookup_fast(&zones_ht, &key, zones_params); // [1] if (ct_ft && refcount_inc_not_zero(&ct_ft->ref)) // [2] goto out_unlock; ... } static __always_inline void *rhashtable_lookup_fast( struct rhashtable *ht, const void *key, const struct rhashtable_params params) { void *obj; rcu_read_lock(); obj = rhashtable_lookup(ht, key, params); rcu_read_unlock(); return obj; } At [1], rhashtable_lookup_fast() looks up and returns the corresponding ct_ft from zones_ht . The lookup is performed within an RCU read critical section through rcu_read_lock() / rcu_read_unlock(), which prevents the object from being freed. However, at the point of function return, rcu_read_unlock() has already been called, and there is nothing preventing ct_ft from being freed before reaching refcount_inc_not_zero(&ct_ft->ref) at [2]. This interval becomes the race window, during which ct_ft can be freed. Free Process: tcf_ct_flow_table_put() is executed through the path tcf_ct_cleanup() call_rcu() tcf_ct_params_free_rcu() tcf_ct_params_free() tcf_ct_flow_table_put(). static void tcf_ct_flow_table_put(struct tcf_ct_flow_table *ct_ft) { if (refcount_dec_and_test(&ct_ft->ref)) { rhashtable_remove_fast(&zones_ht, &ct_ft->node, zones_params); INIT_RCU_WORK(&ct_ft->rwork, tcf_ct_flow_table_cleanup_work); // [3] queue_rcu_work(act_ct_wq, &ct_ft->rwork); } } At [3], tcf_ct_flow_table_cleanup_work() is scheduled as RCU work static void tcf_ct_flow_table_cleanup_work(struct work_struct *work) { struct tcf_ct_flow_table *ct_ft; struct flow_block *block; ct_ft = container_of(to_rcu_work(work), struct tcf_ct_flow_table, rwork); nf_flow_table_free(&ct_ft->nf_ft); block = &ct_ft->nf_ft.flow_block; down_write(&ct_ft->nf_ft.flow_block_lock); WARN_ON(!list_empty(&block->cb_list)); up_write(&ct_ft->nf_ft.flow_block_lock); kfree(ct_ft); // [4] module_put(THIS_MODULE); } tcf_ct_flow_table_cleanup_work() frees ct_ft at [4]. When this function executes between [1] and [2], UAF occurs. This race condition has a very short race window, making it generally difficult to trigger. Therefore, to trigger the vulnerability an msleep(100) was inserted after[1]
Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.
CVSS is 7.8. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.
Analysis status
Analysis pending evidence review
Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.
The current feed maps Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
| Package | Affected range | Fixed version |
|---|---|---|
| Linux/Linuxgeneric | >=138470a9b2cc2e26e6018300394afc3858a54e6a <ece578ca61e572df96cfc80456357ebfae0b4b9e || >=138470a9b2cc2e26e6018300394afc3858a54e6a <a2e0c045c87aa252eb61412e67dd91f2c2b19f81 || >=138470a9b2cc2e26e6018300394afc3858a54e6a <67c9ecc9f2575273ed1323e312881fc98ac83d6d || >=138470a9b2cc2e26e6018300394afc3858a54e6a <f23424a0ddadb494d4bd57056a7ca703312d3a7b || >=138470a9b2cc2e26e6018300394afc3858a54e6a <17dfb67cb399b660105d9a8c6100851c0d0cdc70 || >=138470a9b2cc2e26e6018300394afc3858a54e6a <4c727c6967a41b37efe0f26332ca9ec5b74785a3 || >=138470a9b2cc2e26e6018300394afc3858a54e6a <3e20e1b3058e0b94638e7b931c138e840e266724 || >=138470a9b2cc2e26e6018300394afc3858a54e6a <f462dca0c8415bf0058d0ffa476354c4476d0f09 | ece578ca61e572df96cfc80456357ebfae0b4b9e, a2e0c045c87aa252eb61412e67dd91f2c2b19f81, 67c9ecc9f2575273ed1323e312881fc98ac83d6d, f23424a0ddadb494d4bd57056a7ca703312d3a7b, 17dfb67cb399b660105d9a8c6100851c0d0cdc70, 4c727c6967a41b37efe0f26332ca9ec5b74785a3, 3e20e1b3058e0b94638e7b931c138e840e266724, f462dca0c8415bf0058d0ffa476354c4476d0f09 |
| Linux/Linuxgeneric | 5.7 | Not reported |
Published upstream
Jun 9, 2026
Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:recordSource modified
Aug 5, 2026
Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:recordFirst seen by HOL
Jul 7, 2026
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/sched: act_ct: Only release RCU read lock after ct_ft When looking up a flow table in act_ct in tcf_ct_flow_table_get(), rhashtable_lookup_fast() internally opens and closes an RCU read critical section before returning ct_ft. The tcf_ct_flow_table_cleanup_work() can complete before refcount_inc_not_zero() is invoked on the returned ct_ft resulting in a UAF on the already freed ct_ft object. This vulnerability can lead to privilege escalation. Analysis from [email protected]: When initializing act_ct, tcf_ct_init() is called, which internally triggers tcf_ct_flow_table_get(). static int tcf_ct_flow_table_get(struct net *net, struct tcf_ct_params *params) { struct zones_ht_key key = { .net = net, .zone = params->zone }; struct tcf_ct_flow_table *ct_ft; int err = -ENOMEM; mutex_lock(&zones_mutex); ct_ft = rhashtable_lookup_fast(&zones_ht, &key, zones_params); // [1] if (ct_ft && refcount_inc_not_zero(&ct_ft->ref)) // [2] goto out_unlock; ... } static __always_inline void *rhashtable_lookup_fast( struct rhashtable *ht, const void *key, const struct rhashtable_params params) { void *obj; rcu_read_lock(); obj = rhashtable_lookup(ht, key, params); rcu_read_unlock(); return obj; } At [1], rhashtable_lookup_fast() looks up and returns the corresponding ct_ft from zones_ht . The lookup is performed within an RCU read critical section through rcu_read_lock() / rcu_read_unlock(), which prevents the object from being freed. However, at the point of function return, rcu_read_unlock() has already been called, and there is nothing preventing ct_ft from being freed before reaching refcount_inc_not_zero(&ct_ft->ref) at [2]. This interval becomes the race window, during which ct_ft can be freed. Free Process: tcf_ct_flow_table_put() is executed through the path tcf_ct_cleanup() call_rcu() tcf_ct_params_free_rcu() tcf_ct_params_free() tcf_ct_flow_table_put(). static void tcf_ct_flow_table_put(struct tcf_ct_flow_table *ct_ft) { if (refcount_dec_and_test(&ct_ft->ref)) { rhashtable_remove_fast(&zones_ht, &ct_ft->node, zones_params); INIT_RCU_WORK(&ct_ft->rwork, tcf_ct_flow_table_cleanup_work); // [3] queue_rcu_work(act_ct_wq, &ct_ft->rwork); } } At [3], tcf_ct_flow_table_cleanup_work() is scheduled as RCU work static void tcf_ct_flow_table_cleanup_work(struct work_struct *work) { struct tcf_ct_flow_table *ct_ft; struct flow_block *block; ct_ft = container_of(to_rcu_work(work), struct tcf_ct_flow_table, rwork); nf_flow_table_free(&ct_ft->nf_ft); block = &ct_ft->nf_ft.flow_block; down_write(&ct_ft->nf_ft.flow_block_lock); WARN_ON(!list_empty(&block->cb_list)); up_write(&ct_ft->nf_ft.flow_block_lock); kfree(ct_ft); // [4] module_put(THIS_MODULE); } tcf_ct_flow_table_cleanup_work() frees ct_ft at [4]. When this function executes between [1] and [2], UAF occurs. This race condition has a very short race window, making it generally difficult to trigger. Therefore, to trigger the vulnerability an msleep(100) was inserted after[1]
Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.