HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 46342 nuxt nuxtisland endpoint does not bind responses
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Affiliate program
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
Low · CVSS 5.4CVE-2026-46342GHSA-G8WJ-3CR3-6W7V

Nuxt: `__nuxt_island` endpoint does not bind responses to request props, enabling shared-cache poisoningCVE-2026-46342

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-46342 records a Low severity (CVSS 5.4) vulnerability in Nuxt: `__nuxt_island` endpoint does not bind responses to request props, enabling shared-cache poisoning. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps @nuxt/nitro-server (npm), @nuxt/nitro-server (npm), @nuxt/nitro-server (npm), @nuxt/nitro-server (npm) and additional mapped packages. Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published May 18, 2026Updated Jul 8, 2026Source checked Nov 1, 2026First seen by HOL Jun 19, 2026Material review Jul 8, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
Low · CVSS 5.4
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
6 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 5.4. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps @nuxt/nitro-server (npm), @nuxt/nitro-server (npm), @nuxt/nitro-server (npm), @nuxt/nitro-server (npm) and additional mapped packages. Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
@nuxt/nitro-servernpm>=3.20.0,<=3.21.53.21.6
@nuxt/nitro-servernpm>=4.2.0,<=4.4.54.4.6
@nuxt/nitro-servernpm>=3.20.0,<=3.21.53.21.6
@nuxt/nitro-servernpm>=4.2.0,<=4.4.54.4.6
nuxtnpm>=3.1.0,<=3.21.53.21.6
nuxtnpm>=4.0.0-alpha.1,<=4.4.54.4.6

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for @nuxt/nitro-server, @nuxt/nitro-server, @nuxt/nitro-server.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update @nuxt/nitro-server to 3.21.6; @nuxt/nitro-server to 4.4.6; @nuxt/nitro-server to 3.21.6; @nuxt/nitro-server to 4.4.6; nuxt to 3.21.6; nuxt to 4.4.6 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    May 18, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Jul 8, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Jun 19, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • NVD vulnerability recordnvd.nist.gov
Upstream source description

### Summary The `/__nuxt_island/*` endpoint accepts attacker-controlled `props` query/body parameters and renders any island component without verifying that the URL-resident hash (`<Name>_<hashId>.json`) was actually issued for those inputs by `<NuxtIsland>`. The hash is computed and embedded client-side but never validated server-side, so the same path can return materially different responses depending on the query. Island components are documented as rendering independently of route context - page middleware does not apply to them, and they are intentionally cacheable as a function of their props. This advisory does **not** treat that contract as a vulnerability. It treats the absence of a binding between the URL the cache keys on and the response served at that URL as one. ### Impact In applications where a CDN or reverse-proxy in front of the app caches `/__nuxt_island/*` keyed by path only (ignoring query) - a documented misconfiguration class, see GHSA-jvhm-gjrh-3h93 - an attacker can prime the cache for a path with their own choice of props, and subsequent users requesting the same path receive the attacker's rendered HTML rather than the response intended for them. The cache entry persists until normal expiry. Where the affected island has any prop flowing into an unsafe HTML sink in application code (`v-html`, `innerHTML`, a third-party renderer treating a prop as HTML), this becomes stored XSS in the embedding page's origin until the cache entry expires. `HttpOnly` cookies remain out of reach but anything else in the origin (other cookies, in-origin requests, DOM state) is reachable by the injected script. Preconditions: - `experimental.componentIslands` enabled (or the default `'auto'` with at least one server / island component in the app). - A shared intermediary cache (CDN, reverse-proxy, edge cache) keyed on path only. - For the XSS pivot specifically: an application-authored island that puts a prop through an unsafe HTML sink. Without the second precondition, the response shape is per-request and unaffected. Without the third, the worst case is content-swap / inert HTML injection rather than script execution. ### Patches Patched in `[email protected]` and `[email protected]` by [#35077](https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt/pull/35077). The island handler now recomputes the expected `hashId` from `(name, props, context)` using the same `ohash` function `<NuxtIsland>` already uses to embed the hash in the URL, and rejects requests (HTTP 400) whose URL-resident hash does not match. The response is now a pure function of the request path: a path-keyed shared cache returns the correct response to every requester for that path, and an attacker cannot synthesise a path whose hash matches arbitrary props. ### Workarounds For users unable to upgrade immediately: - Ensure any intermediary cache keys `/__nuxt_island/*` on the full query string, not on the path alone. This is the recommended configuration regardless. - Audit application-authored islands for props flowing into `v-html` / `innerHTML` / similar HTML sinks; treat island props as untrusted user input. ### Note on island authentication > [!IMPORTANT] > It's important to remember that route middleware does not run when rendering island components, and islands cannot rely on routing-layer auth. Applications gating sensitive data behind page middleware should enforce that auth inside the island's own data layer (server-only routes, `useRequestEvent` + manual session checks, etc.) rather than relying on the embedding page's middleware - this was true before this advisory and remains true after it. A separate advisory addresses `*.server.vue` *pages* registered as `page_<routeName>` islands, where the documented "middleware doesn't run for islands" contract collides with the page's own `definePageMeta({ middleware })` declaration in a way that constitutes a genuine bug rather than documented behaviour.

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Related CVEs

  • Ninja Forms <= 3.15.5 - Reflected DOM-Based Cross-Site Scripting via 'querystring:<key>' URL ParameterAlso CWE-79
  • WooCommerce Extra Product Options Pro <= 3.3.2 - Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via '<fieldname>_start' / '<fieldname>_end' ParameterAlso CWE-79
  • FlexStock <= 3.17.2 - Authenticated (Subscriber+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting via 'post_content' Parameter via REST update endpointAlso CWE-79
  • GeoDirectory <= 2.8.197 - Authenticated (Subscriber+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting via 'post_images' Image Title Delimiter InjectionAlso CWE-79
  • Debug Log Manager <= 2.5.2 - Unauthenticated Stored Cross-Site Scripting via 'log_js_errors' AJAX EndpointAlso CWE-79
  • PostyBirb Plus Submission Description Editor DescriptionInput.tsx cross site scriptingAlso CWE-79

Record context

Vulnerability class
XSS
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-79, CWE-349, CWE-444
Source
GitHub Security Advisories
Source checked
Nov 1, 2026
References
4 linked sources
Open source record