## Summary `mcp-server-kubernetes` exposes three environment variables (`ALLOW_ONLY_READONLY_TOOLS`, `ALLOW_ONLY_NON_DESTRUCTIVE_TOOLS`, `ALLOWED_TOOLS`) documented as access controls for restricting which Kubernetes operations are available. These controls are enforced at the tool discovery layer (`tools/list`) but not at the execution layer (`tools/call`). Any client that knows a tool name can invoke it directly regardless of the configured restriction mode. The access control was effectively cosmetic. Fixed in v3.6.0. ## Impact An attacker or misconfigured AI agent with network access to the MCP server's HTTP endpoint could invoke any Kubernetes tool regardless of the restriction mode configured by the operator -- including `kubectl_delete`, `exec_in_pod`, `kubectl_generic`, and `node_management`. The project explicitly supports and documents multi-client HTTP deployment scenarios (Streamable HTTP and SSE transports, in-cluster deployments, Codex CLI and Gemini CLI integrations). In these deployments, operators relied on the tool restriction env vars to enforce least-privilege access across users or roles. The bypass invalidated that model entirely. Severity scales with the Kubernetes service account's permissions. In environments where the MCP server runs with `cluster-admin` (common in dev/staging), this is equivalent to full cluster compromise for any client that can reach the endpoint. The `MCP_AUTH_TOKEN` / `X-MCP-AUTH` mechanism controls who can reach the endpoint but provides no per-tool authorization. An authenticated client restricted to `ALLOWED_TOOLS=kubectl_get` could still invoke `kubectl_delete` after authentication. ## Root Cause In `src/index.ts`, the `ListToolsRequestSchema` handler applied the configured filtering logic before returning available tools. The `CallToolRequestSchema` handler dispatched directly by tool name with no equivalent check -- every tool was reachable unconditionally. ## Proof of Concept Tested across all three restriction modes against a live kind cluster. In each case, `kubectl_delete` was absent from `tools/list` but executed successfully via a direct `tools/call` request: ```shell curl -s http://<HOST>:3003/mcp \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ -H 'Accept: application/json, text/event-stream' \ -d '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":2,"method":"tools/call","params":{"name":"kubectl_delete","arguments":{"resourceType":"pod","name":"test-pod","namespace":"default"}}}' ``` Result: `{"result":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"pod \"test-pod\" deleted\n"}]}}` Confirmed across `ALLOW_ONLY_READONLY_TOOLS=true`, `ALLOW_ONLY_NON_DESTRUCTIVE_TOOLS=true`, and `ALLOWED_TOOLS=kubectl_get`. ## Remediation The fix applies the same filtering logic from `ListToolsRequestSchema` at the start of the `CallToolRequestSchema` handler, returning an error for any tool call outside the active allowed set. Fixed in v3.6.0. ## Credit Discovered by [Francisco Rosales](https://www.linkedin.com/in/francisco-rosales-celis/) of [Manifold Security](https://manifold.security), coordinated by [Ax Sharma](https://www.linkedin.com/in/axsharma/), Head of Research at Manifold Security.
## Summary `mcp-server-kubernetes` exposes three environment variables (`ALLOW_ONLY_READONLY_TOOLS`, `ALLOW_ONLY_NON_DESTRUCTIVE_TOOLS`, `ALLOWED_TOOLS`) documented as access controls for restricting which Kubernetes operations are available. These controls are enforced at the tool discovery layer (`tools/list`) but not at the execution layer (`tools/call`). Any client that knows a tool name can invoke it directly regardless of the configured restriction mode. The access control was effectively cosmetic. Fixed in v3.6.0. ## Impact An attacker or misconfigured AI agent with network access to the MCP server's HTTP endpoint could invoke any Kubernetes tool regardless of the restriction mode configured by the operator -- including `kubectl_delete`, `exec_in_pod`, `kubectl_generic`, and `node_management`. The project explicitly supports and documents multi-client HTTP deployment scenarios (Streamable HTTP and SSE transports, in-cluster deployments, Codex CLI and Gemini CLI integrations). In these deployments, operators relied on the tool restriction env vars to enforce least-privilege access across users or roles. The bypass invalidated that model entirely. Severity scales with the Kubernetes service account's permissions. In environments where the MCP server runs with `cluster-admin` (common in dev/staging), this is equivalent to full cluster compromise for any client that can reach the endpoint. The `MCP_AUTH_TOKEN` / `X-MCP-AUTH` mechanism controls who can reach the endpoint but provides no per-tool authorization. An authenticated client restricted to `ALLOWED_TOOLS=kubectl_get` could still invoke `kubectl_delete` after authentication. ## Root Cause In `src/index.ts`, the `ListToolsRequestSchema` handler applied the configured filtering logic before returning available tools. The `CallToolRequestSchema` handler dispatched directly by tool name with no equivalent check -- every tool was reachable unconditionally. ## Proof of Concept Tested across all three restriction modes against a live kind cluster. In each case, `kubectl_delete` was absent from `tools/list` but executed successfully via a direct `tools/call` request: ```shell curl -s http://<HOST>:3003/mcp \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ -H 'Accept: application/json, text/event-stream' \ -d '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":2,"method":"tools/call","params":{"name":"kubectl_delete","arguments":{"resourceType":"pod","name":"test-pod","namespace":"default"}}}' ``` Result: `{"result":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"pod \"test-pod\" deleted\n"}]}}` Confirmed across `ALLOW_ONLY_READONLY_TOOLS=true`, `ALLOW_ONLY_NON_DESTRUCTIVE_TOOLS=true`, and `ALLOWED_TOOLS=kubectl_get`. ## Remediation The fix applies the same filtering logic from `ListToolsRequestSchema` at the start of the `CallToolRequestSchema` handler, returning an error for any tool call outside the active allowed set. Fixed in v3.6.0. ## Credit Discovered by [Francisco Rosales](https://www.linkedin.com/in/francisco-rosales-celis/) of [Manifold Security](https://manifold.security), coordinated by [Ax Sharma](https://www.linkedin.com/in/axsharma/), Head of Research at Manifold Security.
Update mcp-server-kubernetes to 3.6.0 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.
Local check
hol-guard supply-chain scanMCP Server Kubernetes: Tool Access Control Bypass via Presentation-Layer Filtering Without Execution-Layer Enforcement affects mcp-server-kubernetes (npm). Severity is high. ## Summary `mcp-server-kubernetes` exposes three environment variables (`ALLOW_ONLY_READONLY_TOOLS`, `ALLOW_ONLY_NON_DESTRUCTIVE_TOOLS`, `ALLOWED_TOOLS`) documented as access controls for restricting which Kubernetes operations are available. These controls are enforced at the tool discovery layer (`tools/list`) but not at the execution layer (`tools/call`). Any client that knows a tool name can invoke it directly regardless of the configured restriction mode. The access control was effectively cosmetic. Fixed in v3.6.0. ## Impact An attacker or misconfigured AI agent with network access to the MCP server's HTTP endpoint could invoke any Kubernetes tool regardless of the restriction mode configured by the operator -- including `kubectl_delete`, `exec_in_pod`, `kubectl_generic`, and `node_management`. The project explicitly supports and documents multi-client HTTP deployment scenarios (Streamable HTTP and SSE transports, in-cluster deployments, Codex CLI and Gemini CLI integrations). In these deployments, operators relied on the tool restriction env vars to enforce least-privilege access across users or roles. The bypass invalidated that model entirely. Severity scales with the Kubernetes service account's permissions. In environments where the MCP server runs with `cluster-admin` (common in dev/staging), this is equivalent to full cluster compromise for any client that can reach the endpoint. The `MCP_AUTH_TOKEN` / `X-MCP-AUTH` mechanism controls who can reach the endpoint but provides no per-tool authorization. An authenticated client restricted to `ALLOWED_TOOLS=kubectl_get` could still invoke `kubectl_delete` after authentication. ## Root Cause In `src/index.ts`, the `ListToolsRequestSchema` handler applied the configured filtering logic before returning available tools. The `CallToolRequestSchema` handler dispatched directly by tool name with no equivalent check -- every tool was reachable unconditionally. ## Proof of Concept Tested across all three restriction modes against a live kind cluster. In each case, `kubectl_delete` was absent from `tools/list` but executed successfully via a direct `tools/call` request: ```shell curl -s http://<HOST>:3003/mcp \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ -H 'Accept: application/json, text/event-stream' \ -d '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":2,"method":"tools/call","params":{"name":"kubectl_delete","arguments":{"resourceType":"pod","name":"test-pod","namespace":"default"}}}' ``` Result: `{"result":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"pod \"test-pod\" deleted\n"}]}}` Confirmed across `ALLOW_ONLY_READONLY_TOOLS=true`, `ALLOW_ONLY_NON_DESTRUCTIVE_TOOLS=true`, and `ALLOWED_TOOLS=kubectl_get`. ## Remediation The fix applies the same filtering logic from `ListToolsRequestSchema` at the start of the `CallToolRequestSchema` handler, returning an error for any tool call outside the active allowed set. Fixed in v3.6.0. ## Credit Discovered by [Francisco Rosales](https://www.linkedin.com/in/francisco-rosales-celis/) of [Manifold Security](https://manifold.security), coordinated by [Ax Sharma](https://www.linkedin.com/in/axsharma/), Head of Research at Manifold Security.
AI coding agents often install or upgrade packages automatically in npm. A high vulnerability in a dependency can be pulled into a project through a normal install or update without a human reviewing the change, expanding the blast radius from a single package to every agent workspace that depends on it.
| Package | Affected range | Fixed version |
|---|---|---|
| mcp-server-kubernetesnpm | <3.6.0 | 3.6.0 |
Fixed versions are reported by the source feed; confirm compatibility before updating.
Reported by GitHub Security Advisories (ghsa).
HOL Guard can help your team review package activity against supported protection paths.
Explore HOL GuardUpdate mcp-server-kubernetes to 3.6.0 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.
Local check
hol-guard supply-chain scanMCP Server Kubernetes: Tool Access Control Bypass via Presentation-Layer Filtering Without Execution-Layer Enforcement affects mcp-server-kubernetes (npm). Severity is high. ## Summary `mcp-server-kubernetes` exposes three environment variables (`ALLOW_ONLY_READONLY_TOOLS`, `ALLOW_ONLY_NON_DESTRUCTIVE_TOOLS`, `ALLOWED_TOOLS`) documented as access controls for restricting which Kubernetes operations are available. These controls are enforced at the tool discovery layer (`tools/list`) but not at the execution layer (`tools/call`). Any client that knows a tool name can invoke it directly regardless of the configured restriction mode. The access control was effectively cosmetic. Fixed in v3.6.0. ## Impact An attacker or misconfigured AI agent with network access to the MCP server's HTTP endpoint could invoke any Kubernetes tool regardless of the restriction mode configured by the operator -- including `kubectl_delete`, `exec_in_pod`, `kubectl_generic`, and `node_management`. The project explicitly supports and documents multi-client HTTP deployment scenarios (Streamable HTTP and SSE transports, in-cluster deployments, Codex CLI and Gemini CLI integrations). In these deployments, operators relied on the tool restriction env vars to enforce least-privilege access across users or roles. The bypass invalidated that model entirely. Severity scales with the Kubernetes service account's permissions. In environments where the MCP server runs with `cluster-admin` (common in dev/staging), this is equivalent to full cluster compromise for any client that can reach the endpoint. The `MCP_AUTH_TOKEN` / `X-MCP-AUTH` mechanism controls who can reach the endpoint but provides no per-tool authorization. An authenticated client restricted to `ALLOWED_TOOLS=kubectl_get` could still invoke `kubectl_delete` after authentication. ## Root Cause In `src/index.ts`, the `ListToolsRequestSchema` handler applied the configured filtering logic before returning available tools. The `CallToolRequestSchema` handler dispatched directly by tool name with no equivalent check -- every tool was reachable unconditionally. ## Proof of Concept Tested across all three restriction modes against a live kind cluster. In each case, `kubectl_delete` was absent from `tools/list` but executed successfully via a direct `tools/call` request: ```shell curl -s http://<HOST>:3003/mcp \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ -H 'Accept: application/json, text/event-stream' \ -d '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":2,"method":"tools/call","params":{"name":"kubectl_delete","arguments":{"resourceType":"pod","name":"test-pod","namespace":"default"}}}' ``` Result: `{"result":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"pod \"test-pod\" deleted\n"}]}}` Confirmed across `ALLOW_ONLY_READONLY_TOOLS=true`, `ALLOW_ONLY_NON_DESTRUCTIVE_TOOLS=true`, and `ALLOWED_TOOLS=kubectl_get`. ## Remediation The fix applies the same filtering logic from `ListToolsRequestSchema` at the start of the `CallToolRequestSchema` handler, returning an error for any tool call outside the active allowed set. Fixed in v3.6.0. ## Credit Discovered by [Francisco Rosales](https://www.linkedin.com/in/francisco-rosales-celis/) of [Manifold Security](https://manifold.security), coordinated by [Ax Sharma](https://www.linkedin.com/in/axsharma/), Head of Research at Manifold Security.
AI coding agents often install or upgrade packages automatically in npm. A high vulnerability in a dependency can be pulled into a project through a normal install or update without a human reviewing the change, expanding the blast radius from a single package to every agent workspace that depends on it.
| Package | Affected range | Fixed version |
|---|---|---|
| mcp-server-kubernetesnpm | <3.6.0 | 3.6.0 |
Fixed versions are reported by the source feed; confirm compatibility before updating.
Reported by GitHub Security Advisories (ghsa).
HOL Guard can help your team review package activity against supported protection paths.
Explore HOL Guard