HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 47214 docling unsafe uri and path handling in html
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
High · CVSS 7.1CVE-2026-47214GHSA-Q29V-XC37-WH5M

Docling: Unsafe URI and Path Handling in HTML BackendCVE-2026-47214

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-47214 records a High severity (CVSS 7.1) vulnerability in Docling: Unsafe URI and Path Handling in HTML Backend. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps docling (pip). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Jun 3, 2026Updated Oct 19, 2026Source checked Oct 19, 2026First seen by HOL Jun 26, 2026Material review Oct 19, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Record context

Vulnerability class
Path Traversal
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-73, CWE-400
Source
GitHub Security Advisories
Source checked
Oct 19, 2026
References
8 linked sources
Open source record

Key facts

Risk
High · CVSS 7.1
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
1 mapped package or product
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 7.1. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps docling (pip). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
doclingpip<2.94.02.94.0

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for docling.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update docling to 2.94.0 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Jun 3, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Oct 19, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Jun 26, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • NVD vulnerability recordnvd.nist.gov
Upstream source description

### Impact The HTML backend did not perform sufficient validation during resource handling: - Accepted `file://` URIs enabling local file system access when `enable_local_fetch=True` - Path resolution allowed traversal outside intended directories via `../` sequences and absolute paths - Did not block internal network resources under `enable_remote_fetch=True` - HTTP redirects were not validated, potentially redirecting to unintended schemes - No resource limits for remote image downloads and `data:` URIs ### Patches Fixed in versions 2.91.0 (initial fixes) and 2.94.0 (additional improvements). The fixes implement: - Updated local path treatment: absolute files always blocked, relative paths require `enable_local_fetch=True` (default: False) and containment within configured `base_path` for path traversal protection - `file://` scheme stripped & treated as local path (above) - IP address validation to prevent SSRF - HTTP redirect validation, connection and read timeouts - Size limit for both remote images (with streaming download) and base64-decoded data URIs ### Workarounds Keep both `enable_local_fetch=False` and `enable_remote_fetch=False` (defaults) when processing untrusted HTML documents. ### References - Initial fixes: [v2.91.0](https://github.com/docling-project/docling/releases/tag/v2.91.0) - Additional improvements: [v2.94.0](https://github.com/docling-project/docling/releases/tag/v2.94.0)

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Related CVEs

  • markdown-it: Quadratic-time denial of service in inline HTML parsing with html enabledAlso CWE-400
  • DiffSK configobj __init__.py _sectionmarker redosAlso CWE-400
  • Grav before 1.7.53.5 and 2.2.2 Image Pixel Limit Bypass Denial of ServiceAlso CWE-400