HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 48036 hulumidrift drift classifier fails open on
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Affiliate program
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
High · CVSS 8.4CVE-2026-48036GHSA-32G3-35G9-WC9G

@hulumi/drift: Drift classifier fails open on adapter errors and over-promotes Mixed verdictsCVE-2026-48036

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-48036 records a High severity (CVSS 8.4) vulnerability in @hulumi/drift: Drift classifier fails open on adapter errors and over-promotes Mixed verdicts. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps @hulumi/drift (npm), @hulumi/drift (npm). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Jun 10, 2026Updated Oct 24, 2026Source checked Nov 1, 2026First seen by HOL Jun 11, 2026Material review Oct 24, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
High · CVSS 8.4
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
2 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 8.4. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps @hulumi/drift (npm), @hulumi/drift (npm). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
@hulumi/driftnpm>=0 <1.4.01.4.0
@hulumi/driftnpm<1.4.01.4.0

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for @hulumi/drift, @hulumi/drift.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update @hulumi/drift to 1.4.0; @hulumi/drift to 1.4.0 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Jun 10, 2026

    Evidence: source:nvd:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Oct 24, 2026

    Evidence: source:nvd:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Jun 11, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
Upstream source description

**Affected:** `@hulumi/drift` `< 1.4.0` — **Fixed in:** `1.4.0` — **Severity:** Medium — **CWE-755 (Improper Handling of Exceptional Conditions)** #### Summary `@hulumi/drift` runs four adapters that each ask a different question about whether a resource has drifted (Pulumi-state diff, provider-version change, CloudTrail event, etc.). A classifier combines the adapters' answers into a verdict like `None / none`, `ConsoleBreakGlass / high`, or `Mixed / high`, and caches the verdict for 6 hours by default. Two related bugs from one root cause — the classifier only read each adapter's `detected: true/false` field and ignored whether the adapter itself succeeded: 1. **Cached "all clear" on adapter failure.** When an adapter failed (e.g. transient network error from the Automation API), the classifier read `detected: false`, concluded "no drift", and cached the verdict as `None / none` for 6 hours. A single transient failure could mask real console-break-glass mutations for the rest of the window. 2. **Mixed verdicts without real evidence.** The `Mixed / high` and `ConsoleBreakGlass / high` verdicts (incident severity) could fire on the "the CloudTrail probe round-tripped successfully" signal rather than actual evidence that anything had been changed via the console. Normal provider-API churn could end up falsely escalated to incident severity. #### Impact Consumers running drift detection in CI / cron could see transient adapter failures silently cached as "all clear" — masking real attacks for up to six hours — or see ordinary provider-version churn falsely promoted to incident severity. Either way, the verdict source was unreliable for downstream incident workflows that gate on it. #### Patches Upgrade to `@hulumi/[email protected]`. Classifier-only fix (the TLA+-verified 6-row verdict matrix is byte-identical): - adapter failures now fail closed to `Unknown / low`, and degraded verdicts are not written to the cache; - the `Mixed` / `ConsoleBreakGlass` promotion now requires real CloudTrail event evidence rather than probe liveness. #### Workarounds Setting `options.minConfidence: "medium"` on the classifier call prevents the degraded `None / none` from being cached (it doesn't meet the threshold), partially mitigating case (1). No workaround for case (2). #### Resources - [PR #178](https://github.com/kerberosmansour/hulumi/pull/178) (Cluster D); regression tests in `packages/drift/tests/classifier-fail-closed.test.ts`.

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Record context

Vulnerability class
Vulnerability
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-755
Source
GitHub Security Advisories
Source checked
Nov 1, 2026
References
5 linked sources
Open source record