Answer in brief
CVE-2026-48078 records a Medium severity (CVSS 5.3) vulnerability in OpenReception's schedule endpoint discloses isPublic=false channels and slot availability to unauthenticated callers. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps open-reception/appointment-booking-software (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
Analysis pending evidence review
HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.
CVSS is 5.3. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.
Analysis status
Analysis pending evidence review
Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.
The current feed maps open-reception/appointment-booking-software (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
| Package | Affected range | Fixed version |
|---|---|---|
| open-reception/appointment-booking-softwaregeneric | < 1.0.5 | Not reported |
Published upstream
Aug 6, 2026
Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:recordSource modified
Aug 6, 2026
Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:recordFirst seen by HOL
Aug 6, 2026
OpenReception's appointment booking software provides an end-to-end encrypted appointment booking platform. Prior to version 1.0.5, the unauthenticated `/api/tenants/{id}/schedule` endpoint returns every non-archived channel for a tenant regardless of the channel's `isPublic` flag. Channels marked `isPublic = false` are intended to be invisible to public callers; the dashboard creates them deliberately to hide internal-only services from the patient booking UI. The schedule endpoint ignores the flag entirely and discloses channel names, descriptions, IDs, agent associations, pause status, confirmation requirements, and computed slot availability for the requested date range. The asymmetry between `addAppointmentToTunnel` (which enforces `eq(channel.isPublic, true)`) and the schedule endpoint (which does not) confirms the design intent: private channels exist as a real access boundary in the booking flow, just not in the schedule disclosure. Version 1.0.5 patches the issue.
Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.
Answer in brief
CVE-2026-48078 records a Medium severity (CVSS 5.3) vulnerability in OpenReception's schedule endpoint discloses isPublic=false channels and slot availability to unauthenticated callers. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps open-reception/appointment-booking-software (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
Analysis pending evidence review
HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.
CVSS is 5.3. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.
Analysis status
Analysis pending evidence review
Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.
The current feed maps open-reception/appointment-booking-software (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
| Package | Affected range | Fixed version |
|---|---|---|
| open-reception/appointment-booking-softwaregeneric | < 1.0.5 | Not reported |
Published upstream
Aug 6, 2026
Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:recordSource modified
Aug 6, 2026
Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:recordFirst seen by HOL
Aug 6, 2026
OpenReception's appointment booking software provides an end-to-end encrypted appointment booking platform. Prior to version 1.0.5, the unauthenticated `/api/tenants/{id}/schedule` endpoint returns every non-archived channel for a tenant regardless of the channel's `isPublic` flag. Channels marked `isPublic = false` are intended to be invisible to public callers; the dashboard creates them deliberately to hide internal-only services from the patient booking UI. The schedule endpoint ignores the flag entirely and discloses channel names, descriptions, IDs, agent associations, pause status, confirmation requirements, and computed slot availability for the requested date range. The asymmetry between `addAppointmentToTunnel` (which enforces `eq(channel.isPublic, true)`) and the schedule endpoint (which does not) confirms the design intent: private channels exist as a real access boundary in the booking flow, just not in the schedule disclosure. Version 1.0.5 patches the issue.
Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.