HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 48797 backpropagate backprop ui auth and backprop ui
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
Critical severityCVE-2026-48797GHSA-F65R-H4G3-3H9H

Backpropagate: backprop ui --auth and backprop ui --share do not enforce authenticationCVE-2026-48797

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-48797 records a Critical severity vulnerability in Backpropagate: backprop ui --auth and backprop ui --share do not enforce authentication. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps @mcptoolshop/backpropagate (npm), @mcptoolshop/backpropagate (npm), @mcptoolshop/backpropagate (npm), backpropagate (pip) and additional mapped packages. Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Jun 26, 2026Updated Oct 27, 2026Source checked Oct 27, 2026First seen by HOL Jun 26, 2026Material review Oct 27, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
Critical
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
5 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

A CVSS score is not reported in the current record. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps @mcptoolshop/backpropagate (npm), @mcptoolshop/backpropagate (npm), @mcptoolshop/backpropagate (npm), backpropagate (pip) and additional mapped packages. Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
@mcptoolshop/backpropagatenpm>=1.1.0,<1.2.01.2.0
@mcptoolshop/backpropagatenpm>=1.1.0,<1.2.01.2.0
@mcptoolshop/backpropagatenpm>=1.1.0 <1.2.01.2.0
backpropagatepip>=1.1.0,<1.2.01.2.0
backpropagatepypi>=1.1.0 <1.2.01.2.0

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for @mcptoolshop/backpropagate, @mcptoolshop/backpropagate, @mcptoolshop/backpropagate.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update @mcptoolshop/backpropagate to 1.2.0; @mcptoolshop/backpropagate to 1.2.0; @mcptoolshop/backpropagate to 1.2.0; backpropagate to 1.2.0; backpropagate to 1.2.0 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Jun 26, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Oct 27, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Jun 26, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • NVD vulnerability recordnvd.nist.gov
  • Source referencepypi.org
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
Upstream source description

## Summary In `backpropagate >= 1.1.0`, the optional Reflex web UI (`pip install backpropagate[ui]`, launched via `backprop ui`) exposes a training control plane: dataset upload, model load, training start/stop, multi-run orchestration, GGUF export, and HuggingFace Hub push. The CLI accepts two operator-facing flags intended as security controls: - `--auth user:pass` — documented as "require HTTP Basic authentication on every request to the UI." - `--share` — documented as "expose the UI on a public address; requires `--auth`." When `--auth user:pass` is passed, the CLI prints `Auth: enabled (user: <username>)` to confirm to the operator that authentication is active, then exports `BACKPROPAGATE_UI_AUTH=user:pass` to the subprocess that launches the Reflex backend. **The Reflex backend (`backpropagate/ui_app/**`) never reads `BACKPROPAGATE_UI_AUTH`.** No authentication middleware is registered. No request-level guard runs. No WebSocket upgrade guard runs. Any client that reaches the bound port — local or remote, depending on whether `--share` is used — has full UI access. An inline comment at `backpropagate/cli.py:1217-1218` in the v1.1.0 source documents the gap: *"For Phase 1 the variable is exported but Reflex doesn't read it yet."* This comment was internal-facing; the user-facing documentation (README, CHANGELOG, SHIP_GATE) advertised the contract as enforced. This advisory is filed primarily because the runtime contradicted an operator-facing security claim. Code-only bugs of comparable shape (auth check missing entirely from a path) would already warrant disclosure; the additional false-promise dimension raises the severity. ## Impact An attacker who reaches the bound port can: - **Read uploaded datasets** rendered in the UI preview, including content of any JSONL/CSV/TXT file the legitimate operator has uploaded for fine-tuning. - **Trigger arbitrary training runs** against any base model the operator has installed locally or that can be downloaded from HuggingFace. - **Trigger HuggingFace Hub pushes** to repositories named via the UI input (subject to the operator's local HF token's scope — typically all repos owned by the operator). - **Cause disk-fill DoS** via the `rx.upload` endpoint (no size cap, no extension filter, no per-session count cap in v1.1.0 / v1.1.1). - **Read model paths** (`source_model_path`, `dataset_path`, `model`, `uploaded_path`) which are user-supplied and bypass the `safe_path()` helper that lives in `backpropagate/ui_security.py` (path validation is dead code on the Reflex surface in v1.1.0 / v1.1.1). The combination of unauthenticated training control, HF push target spoofing, and path-input traversal makes the affected endpoint suitable for both data exfiltration (reading uploaded training data) and supply-chain attacks (pushing tampered model weights to the operator's HF account). The local-only default (no `--share`) reduces exposure to a host-local attacker. The `--share` flag is documented as a "public URL" feature; operators who used `--share --auth user:pass` had no warning that the auth half was inert. ## Patches Fixed in **v1.2.0** (released 2026-05-23). The patch implements real ASGI middleware via `rx.App(api_transformer=basic_auth_transformer)` that gates HTTP routes AND the `/_event` WebSocket upgrade. Four modes (`no_auth_local_only` / `token_auto` / `explicit_creds` / `production`), HMAC-signed cookie validated PRE-`websocket.accept()`, Host + Origin allowlists. The middleware ships alongside a 4-layer defense in depth at the cli.py / ui_app/app.py / rxconfig.py / env-strip surfaces so direct `python -m reflex run` invocations (bypassing the CLI guard) also enforce authentication. Upgrade with: - pip: `pip install --upgrade backpropagate` - npm: `npm install -g @mcptoolshop/backpropagate@latest` Full release notes: https://github.com/mcp-tool-shop-org/backpropagate/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#120---2026-05-23 ## Workarounds If users cannot upgrade immediately: 1. **Do not pass `--auth` or `--share` to `backprop ui`.** Run the UI with no flags (`backprop ui`); it will bind to `localhost` and accept any client that can reach `127.0.0.1`. 2. **For remote access, use SSH port-forwarding** instead of `--share`: ``` # On the client: ssh -L 7860:localhost:7860 <training-host> # On the server: backprop ui # no --share # Then open http://localhost:7860 in your local browser. ``` SSH provides the authentication layer the Reflex UI did not. 3. **Audit existing deployments.** If any host running `backpropagate >= 1.1.0` has previously been launched with `--share`, treat any uploaded training data, model paths, or HF push targets visible in that UI session as potentially exposed. Re-issue HF tokens that have been in use during such sessions. **Binary distribution gap.** Standalone binaries (Windows .exe / macOS .app via PyInstaller) failed to build for v1.2.0 and will land in a follow-up patch release. In the interim, users who relied on the v1.1.x binary distribution should install the patched version via `pip install backpropagate==1.2.0` to receive the auth-bypass fix. The v1.2.0 PyPI package and `@mcptoolshop/[email protected]` npm package both carry the patched code. ## Credit Discovered by the dogfood-swarm Stage A audit on 2026-05-22 (finding ID `FRONTEND-A-001`, classified CRITICAL). The audit also surfaced contradicting documentation in CHANGELOG / SHIP_GATE / README; those were corrected in v1.2.0 alongside the runtime fix.

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Related CVEs

  • Tanium addressed an improper access controls vulnerability in Comply.Also CWE-862
  • Tanium addressed an improper access controls vulnerability in Enforce.Also CWE-862
  • OpenWISP Controller CA CRL REST API does not scope requests to managed organizationsAlso CWE-862
  • CVE-2026-16491 CVE RecordAlso CWE-862

Record context

Vulnerability class
Missing Auth
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-358, CWE-862, CWE-1295
Source
GitHub Security Advisories
Source checked
Oct 27, 2026
References
7 linked sources
Open source record