Answer in brief
CVE-2026-48988 records a Medium severity (CVSS 5.3) vulnerability in markdown-it: Quadratic complexity DoS in smartquotes rule via replaceAt string operations. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps markdown-it (npm), markdown-it (npm). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
Analysis pending evidence review
HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.
CVSS is 5.3. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.
Analysis status
Analysis pending evidence review
Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.
The current feed maps markdown-it (npm), markdown-it (npm). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
| Package | Affected range | Fixed version |
|---|---|---|
| markdown-itnpm | <=14.1.1 | 14.2.0 |
| markdown-itnpm | >=0 <14.2.0 | 14.2.0 |
Published upstream
Jun 15, 2026
Evidence: source:osv:source_dates:source-dates:recordSource modified
Sep 10, 2026
Evidence: source:osv:source_dates:source-dates:recordFirst seen by HOL
Jun 19, 2026
### Summary A quadratic time complexity vulnerability exists in markdown-it's smartquotes rule (enabled via the `typographer: true` option). An attacker can craft a markdown input consisting of consecutive quotation marks that causes the parser to consume excessive CPU time, leading to denial of service. ### Details The vulnerability is in the `replaceAt()` helper function used by the smartquotes rule in `lib/rules_core/smartquotes.mjs`: ```javascript function replaceAt (str, index, ch) { return str.slice(0, index) + ch + str.slice(index + 1) } ``` When markdown-it processes a text token containing many quotation marks (either `"` or `'`) with `typographer: true`, the smartquotes rule iterates through each quote character and calls `replaceAt()` to substitute it with a typographic (curly) quote. Each call to `replaceAt()` creates three new string slices and concatenates them, which is an O(n) operation where n is the length of the string. Since this is called once per quote character in the token, and there are n quote characters, the total time complexity becomes O(n^2). The root cause is that the smartquotes rule modifies `token.content` in place using string slicing rather than building the result incrementally. The `process_inlines()` function (line 14) processes each quote in the text token, and for matching quote pairs, calls `replaceAt()` on both the opening and closing token's content (lines 151-152). When the entire input is a single text token of quote characters, this results in quadratic behavior. ### PoC ```javascript const md = require('markdown-it'); const instance = md({ typographer: true }); // 160,000 consecutive double-quote characters const payload = '"'.repeat(160000); console.time('render'); instance.render(payload); console.timeEnd('render'); // Output: render: ~21000ms (21 seconds) // Compare with typographer disabled: const safe = md({ typographer: false }); console.time('render-safe'); safe.render(payload); console.timeEnd('render-safe'); // Output: render-safe: ~8ms ``` Measured timing on a modern system: - 10,000 quotes: ~19ms - 20,000 quotes: ~51ms - 40,000 quotes: ~212ms - 80,000 quotes: ~5,430ms - 160,000 quotes: ~21,198ms The scaling is clearly superlinear (quadratic), with the 80K->160K step showing a ~3.9x increase for a 2x input increase, consistent with O(n^2). ### Impact Applications that render user-supplied markdown with `typographer: true` are vulnerable to denial of service. An attacker can submit a relatively small payload (160KB of quote characters) that causes the server to spend over 21 seconds processing a single request. Repeated submissions can exhaust server CPU resources and prevent legitimate users from being served. The impact is mitigated by the fact that the `typographer` option defaults to `false` and must be explicitly enabled. However, the typographer feature is commonly enabled in production applications that want smart typography, and the markdown-it documentation prominently suggests enabling it. A suggested fix would be to replace the `replaceAt()` approach with an array-based or StringBuilder-style approach that collects all replacements and applies them in a single pass, reducing the time complexity to O(n).
Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.