HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 48988 markdown it quadratic complexity dos in
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Affiliate program
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
Medium · CVSS 5.3CVE-2026-48988GHSA-6V5V-WF23-FMFQ

markdown-it: Quadratic complexity DoS in smartquotes rule via replaceAt string operationsCVE-2026-48988

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-48988 records a Medium severity (CVSS 5.3) vulnerability in markdown-it: Quadratic complexity DoS in smartquotes rule via replaceAt string operations. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps markdown-it (npm), markdown-it (npm). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Jun 15, 2026Updated Sep 10, 2026Source checked Nov 1, 2026First seen by HOL Jun 19, 2026Material review Sep 10, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
Medium · CVSS 5.3
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
2 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 5.3. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps markdown-it (npm), markdown-it (npm). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
markdown-itnpm<=14.1.114.2.0
markdown-itnpm>=0 <14.2.014.2.0

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for markdown-it, markdown-it.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update markdown-it to 14.2.0; markdown-it to 14.2.0 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Jun 15, 2026

    Evidence: source:osv:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Sep 10, 2026

    Evidence: source:osv:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Jun 19, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
Upstream source description

### Summary A quadratic time complexity vulnerability exists in markdown-it's smartquotes rule (enabled via the `typographer: true` option). An attacker can craft a markdown input consisting of consecutive quotation marks that causes the parser to consume excessive CPU time, leading to denial of service. ### Details The vulnerability is in the `replaceAt()` helper function used by the smartquotes rule in `lib/rules_core/smartquotes.mjs`: ```javascript function replaceAt (str, index, ch) { return str.slice(0, index) + ch + str.slice(index + 1) } ``` When markdown-it processes a text token containing many quotation marks (either `"` or `'`) with `typographer: true`, the smartquotes rule iterates through each quote character and calls `replaceAt()` to substitute it with a typographic (curly) quote. Each call to `replaceAt()` creates three new string slices and concatenates them, which is an O(n) operation where n is the length of the string. Since this is called once per quote character in the token, and there are n quote characters, the total time complexity becomes O(n^2). The root cause is that the smartquotes rule modifies `token.content` in place using string slicing rather than building the result incrementally. The `process_inlines()` function (line 14) processes each quote in the text token, and for matching quote pairs, calls `replaceAt()` on both the opening and closing token's content (lines 151-152). When the entire input is a single text token of quote characters, this results in quadratic behavior. ### PoC ```javascript const md = require('markdown-it'); const instance = md({ typographer: true }); // 160,000 consecutive double-quote characters const payload = '"'.repeat(160000); console.time('render'); instance.render(payload); console.timeEnd('render'); // Output: render: ~21000ms (21 seconds) // Compare with typographer disabled: const safe = md({ typographer: false }); console.time('render-safe'); safe.render(payload); console.timeEnd('render-safe'); // Output: render-safe: ~8ms ``` Measured timing on a modern system: - 10,000 quotes: ~19ms - 20,000 quotes: ~51ms - 40,000 quotes: ~212ms - 80,000 quotes: ~5,430ms - 160,000 quotes: ~21,198ms The scaling is clearly superlinear (quadratic), with the 80K->160K step showing a ~3.9x increase for a 2x input increase, consistent with O(n^2). ### Impact Applications that render user-supplied markdown with `typographer: true` are vulnerable to denial of service. An attacker can submit a relatively small payload (160KB of quote characters) that causes the server to spend over 21 seconds processing a single request. Repeated submissions can exhaust server CPU resources and prevent legitimate users from being served. The impact is mitigated by the fact that the `typographer` option defaults to `false` and must be explicitly enabled. However, the typographer feature is commonly enabled in production applications that want smart typography, and the markdown-it documentation prominently suggests enabling it. A suggested fix would be to replace the `replaceAt()` approach with an array-based or StringBuilder-style approach that collects all replacements and applies them in a single pass, reducing the time complexity to O(n).

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Record context

Vulnerability class
Secret Exfiltration
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-400
Source
GitHub Security Advisories
Source checked
Nov 1, 2026
References
4 linked sources
Open source record