HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 50169 angular service worker policy bypass credential
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Affiliate program
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
Medium · CVSS 6.1CVE-2026-50169GHSA-GV2Q-MQQV-365M

Angular Service Worker Policy-Bypass & Credential-Stripping VulnerabilitiesCVE-2026-50169

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-50169 records a Medium severity (CVSS 6.1) vulnerability in Angular Service Worker Policy-Bypass & Credential-Stripping Vulnerabilities. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps @angular/service-worker (npm), @angular/service-worker (npm), @angular/service-worker (npm), @angular/service-worker (npm) and additional mapped packages. Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published May 28, 2026Updated Jul 15, 2026Source checked Nov 1, 2026First seen by HOL Jun 19, 2026Material review Jul 15, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
Medium · CVSS 6.1
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
9 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 6.1. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps @angular/service-worker (npm), @angular/service-worker (npm), @angular/service-worker (npm), @angular/service-worker (npm) and additional mapped packages. Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
@angular/service-workernpm>=22.0.0-next.0,<22.0.0-rc.222.0.0-rc.2
@angular/service-workernpm>=20.0.0-next.0,<20.3.2220.3.22
@angular/service-workernpm>=19.0.0-next.0,<19.2.2319.2.23
@angular/service-workernpm<=18.2.14Not reported
@angular/service-workernpm>=21.0.0-next.0,<21.2.1521.2.15
@angular/service-workernpm>=22.0.0-next.0<22.0.0-rc.2Not reported
@angular/service-workernpm>=21.0.0-next.0<21.2.15Not reported
@angular/service-workernpm>=20.0.0-next.0<20.3.22Not reported
@angular/service-workernpm>=19.0.0-next.0<19.2.23Not reported

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for @angular/service-worker, @angular/service-worker, @angular/service-worker.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update @angular/service-worker to 22.0.0-rc.2; @angular/service-worker to 20.3.22; @angular/service-worker to 19.2.23; @angular/service-worker to 21.2.15 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    May 28, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Jul 15, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Jun 19, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • NVD vulnerability recordnvd.nist.gov
Upstream source description

An issue in the `@angular/service-worker` package compromises the integrity of request-policy enforcement during request reconstruction. When the Angular Service Worker intercepts network requests for matched assets, it reconstructs a new `Request` object using an internal helper function. During this reconstruction process, the helper function strips the strict, client-defined request redirect policy configuration (such as `redirect: 'error'`), falling back to the browser's default `'follow'` strategy. If the target web application makes client-side requests with a strict policy (e.g., expecting a network error instead of automatically following redirects), the service worker will bypass this instruction and automatically follow HTTP 3xx redirects to other destinations. This acts as an unintended proxy/intermediary ("Confused Deputy") and can result in cookie/credential exposure or same-origin session-restricted data leakage if public dynamic routes redirect to sensitive routes. ### Impact Web applications registering the `@angular/service-worker` package are vulnerable to this redirect-policy bypass if they make safe client-side fetch calls (such as `{ redirect: 'error' }`) to paths matched by a service worker asset group (such as lazy-loaded JavaScript bundles or dynamic public assets) that can return HTTP redirects to authenticated same-origin secure endpoints. By stripping developer-defined safety boundaries, the service worker allows the browser to transparently query and return data from credentials-guarded resources that should have been blocked at the network barrier. ### Attack Preconditions To successfully exploit this vulnerability, all of the following application states and parameters must concurrently exist: 1. **Active Angular Service Worker:** The target application uses `@angular/service-worker` and has an active registration of `ngsw-worker.js` inside the client's browser context. 2. **Asset Group Matching:** An `assetGroups` pattern in `ngsw-config.json` encompasses the target dynamic routing endpoint. 3. **Same-Origin Dynamic Redirection:** The server routes a public matched asset route to a service that returns an HTTP 3xx redirect pointing to a sensitive, session-restricted same-origin private route (e.g., `/private/account-summary.json`). 4. **Established User Session:** The victim user currently has an active authentication state, such as valid same-origin session cookies or auth headers stored by the browser. 5. **Client-Side Safe Fetch Call:** The application initiates an explicit fetch request to the route with safety parameters: `{ redirect: 'error' }`. ### Mitigations & Workarounds If upgrading the `@angular/service-worker` package is not immediately feasible, developers should implement the following defensive measures: * **Avoid Public-to-Private Dynamic Redirection:** Refactor the server architecture so that public paths matched by service worker asset groups never issue HTTP 3xx redirects to authenticated same-origin secure endpoints. * **Strict Cookie Configuration:** Apply strict flags to session cookies (`SameSite=Strict; Secure; HttpOnly`) and consider explicit route isolations (such as subdomains) for credential-guarded private resources. * **Exclude Secure Endpoints from SW Config:** Verify your `ngsw-config.json` settings and ensure that patterns targeting dynamic, secure endpoints are explicitly excluded from automatic asset groups or caching scopes. ### Patches - 22.0.0-rc.2 - 21.2.15 - 20.3.22 - 19.2.23 ### References - https://github.com/angular/angular/pull/67494

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Related CVEs

  • Kali Forms < 2.4.30 - Subscriber+ User Email Address DisclosureAlso CWE-200
  • MapPress Maps for WordPress < 2.97.15 - Unauthenticated Email Address DisclosureAlso CWE-200
  • Presenton Desktop Authentication Middleware app_data information disclosureAlso CWE-200

Record context

Vulnerability class
Arbitrary File Read
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-200, CWE-441, CWE-524
Source
GitHub Security Advisories
Source checked
Nov 1, 2026
References
4 linked sources
Open source record