Answer in brief
CVE-2026-50171 records a High severity (CVSS 8.2) vulnerability in @angular/common: Denial of Service (DoS) via OOM in Number Formatting (digitsInfo). The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps @angular/common (npm), @angular/common (npm), @angular/common (npm), @angular/common (npm) and additional mapped packages. Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
Analysis pending evidence review
HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.
CVSS is 8.2. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.
Analysis status
Analysis pending evidence review
Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.
The current feed maps @angular/common (npm), @angular/common (npm), @angular/common (npm), @angular/common (npm) and additional mapped packages. Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
| Package | Affected range | Fixed version |
|---|---|---|
| @angular/commonnpm | >=22.0.0-next.0,<22.0.0-rc.2 | 22.0.0-rc.2 |
| @angular/commonnpm | >=20.0.0-next.0,<20.3.22 | 20.3.22 |
| @angular/commonnpm | >=19.0.0-next.0,<19.2.23 | 19.2.23 |
| @angular/commonnpm | <=18.2.14 | Not reported |
| @angular/commonnpm | >=21.0.0-next.0,<21.2.15 | 21.2.15 |
| @angular/commonnpm | >=22.0.0-next.0<22.0.0-rc.2 | Not reported |
| @angular/commonnpm | >=21.0.0-next.0<21.2.15 | Not reported |
| @angular/commonnpm | >=20.0.0-next.0<20.3.22 | Not reported |
| @angular/commonnpm | >=19.0.0-next.0<19.2.23 | Not reported |
Published upstream
May 28, 2026
Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:recordSource modified
Jul 15, 2026
Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:recordFirst seen by HOL
Jun 19, 2026
A Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability exists in the `@angular/common` package of Angular. The `formatNumber` function, which is also utilized by `DecimalPipe`, `PercentPipe`, and `CurrencyPipe`, does not properly validate the upper bounds of the `digitsInfo` parameter. Specifically, the minimum and maximum fraction digits parsed from the `digitsInfo` string (e.g., `1.2-4`) are converted to integers and used without limits. When parsing a maliciously crafted `digitsInfo` string with excessively large fraction digit values (e.g., `1.200000000-200000000`), the internal `roundNumber` function attempts to pad the digits array to match the requested fraction size. This results in an unbounded loop that repeatedly pushes elements into an array. ### Impact Successful exploitation of this vulnerability allows an attacker to trigger resource exhaustion, leading to a Denial of Service (DoS): * **Server-Side Rendering (SSR):** In applications using SSR (e.g., `@angular/ssr`), an attacker can crash the Node.js server process due to a `JavaScript heap out of memory` error. This affects the availability of the application for all users. * **Client-Side Rendering (CSR):** In standard client-side applications, the unbounded loop will block the main thread, freezing the user's browser tab and making it unresponsive. ### Attack Preconditions For this vulnerability to be exploitable, the following conditions must be met: 1. **Vulnerable Component Usage:** The application must use Angular's number formatting utilities, such as the `formatNumber` function directly, or via template pipes (`DecimalPipe`, `PercentPipe`, `CurrencyPipe`). 2. **Attacker-Controlled Parameter:** The `digitsInfo` parameter passed to these utilities must be customizable or directly controlled by untrusted user input (e.g., parsed from query parameters, user preference settings, or API responses that accept user-defined formatting options). If `digitsInfo` is trusted or limited to a known, defined range for its value, the vulnerability is not exploitable by external attackers. ### Patches - 22.0.0-rc.2 - 21.2.15 - 20.3.22 - 19.2.23 ### References - https://github.com/angular/angular/pull/68840 ### Credits This vulnerability was discovered and reported by [CodeMender from Google DeepMind](https://deepmind.google/blog/introducing-codemender-an-ai-agent-for-code-security/).
Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.