HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorKeep agent security open: sponsor a project, place a banner, or fund a security initiative.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 50178 remote code execution via jsdoc hover command
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
High · CVSS 8.8CVE-2026-50178GHSA-Q94J-3WJ3-4XCM

Remote Code Execution via JSDoc Hover Command Injection in VS Code Angular Language Service ExtensionCVE-2026-50178

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-50178 records a High severity (CVSS 8.8) vulnerability in Remote Code Execution via JSDoc Hover Command Injection in VS Code Angular Language Service Extension. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps Angular.ng-template (vscode extension). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published May 28, 2026Updated Jun 26, 2026Source checked Oct 10, 2026First seen by HOL Jun 22, 2026Material review Jun 26, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
High · CVSS 8.8
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
1 mapped package or product
Fix availability
Not reported

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 8.8. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps Angular.ng-template (vscode extension). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
Angular.ng-templatevscode extension<21.2.4Not reported

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for Angular.ng-template.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Monitor this advisory for an available fix and review any installs of the affected package.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    May 28, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Jun 26, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Jun 22, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
Upstream source description

The client-side Angular Language Service VS Code extension configures the tooltip Markdown renderer with the `isTrusted: true` option (located in `client/src/client.ts`). This setting instructs VS Code to trust all rendered content it receives, which enables active elements such as `command:` URIs. However, the background Angular Language Server process fails to escape or sanitize brackets, raw links, and control characters from JSDoc strings before forwarding the hover Markdown content (located in `server/src/handlers/hover.ts` and `server/src/text_render.ts`). An attacker can leverage this behavior by crafting a project TypeScript or JavaScript file (or a third-party npm package dependency) containing a malicious JSDoc tooltip with an embedded active command link. When a developer hovers over the target symbol to render the tooltip and clicks the malicious link, the IDE executes the command sequence directly on the developer's host machine. ### Impact Any developer using the VS Code Angular Language Service extension (`Angular.ng-template`) prior to version `21.2.4` who opens a project workspace containing files or dependencies with crafted JSDoc comments is vulnerable to arbitrary Remote Code Execution. Because this pathway can execute commands despite standard VS Code Restricted Mode limits, it bypasses the core guarantees of VS Code's Workspace Trust model. An interactive hover click can be chained to execute arbitrary shell commands, turning ordinary activities like code reviews, dependency updates, or code exploration into direct developer host compromises. ### Attack Preconditions To successfully exploit this vulnerability, the following environment parameters and user actions must take place: 1. **Extension Installed & Active:** The victim developer must have the VS Code Angular Language Service extension (`Angular.ng-template`, version prior to `21.2.4`) active in their workspace. 2. **Malicious JSDoc comment in Source:** The developer must open a code folder (or install a package dependency) that houses a TS/JS file with a JSDoc payload containing a formatted link and active `command:` URI parameters inside an inline template. 3. **User Interaction (Click):** The developer must hover over the target symbol to render the Markdown tooltip popup and click the active link inside the balloon bubble. ### Patches Upgrade the VS Code Angular Language Service extension (`Angular.ng-template`) to version `21.2.4` or later. ### References * **Harden JSDoc Markdown trust and document opening:** [PR #68858](https://github.com/angular/angular/pull/68858) * **Disable language server in untrusted workspaces:** [PR #68886](https://github.com/angular/angular/pull/68886) * **VS Code Extension Security Guidelines (Trusted Markdown):** [Virtual Documents Guide](https://code.visualstudio.com/api/extension-guides/virtual-documents#trusted-markdown) * **VS Code Workspace Trust Specifications:** [Workspace Trust Guide](https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/editor/workspace-trust) * **VS Code Extension Guidelines on Workspace Trust:** [Workspace Trust Extension API Guide](https://code.visualstudio.com/api/extension-guides/workspace-trust) ### Credits This vulnerability was discovered and reported by [CodeMender from Google DeepMind](https://deepmind.google/blog/introducing-codemender-an-ai-agent-for-code-security/).

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Related CVEs

  • Fluent Forms <= 6.2.14 - Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via '{get.*}' Editor SmartCode ParameterAlso CWE-79
  • Download Manager <= 3.3.71 - Authenticated (Contributor+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting via 'regurl' Shortcode AttributeAlso CWE-79
  • Anti-Spam by CleanTalk <= 6.88 - Unauthenticated Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Comment Content via ContactsEncoder Greedy RegexAlso CWE-79
  • Simple Newsletter Plugin <= 4.3.10 - Unauthenticated Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Subscriber Custom Field via Manage Preferences Form + Campaign Preview noptin_key PivotAlso CWE-79
  • HivePress <= 1.7.31 - Authenticated (Subscriber+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Listing Attribute Value in Administrator-configured HTML FormatAlso CWE-79
  • JetFormBuilder <= 3.6.6 - Reflected DOM-Based Cross-Site Scripting via 'query_var' Dynamic Preset via data-jfb-macro / JFB_FIELD:: Macro RendererAlso CWE-79

Record context

Vulnerability class
XSS
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-79, CWE-94
Source
GitHub Security Advisories
Source checked
Oct 10, 2026
References
1 linked source
Open source record