HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorKeep agent security open: sponsor a project, place a banner, or fund a security initiative.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 50184 request credential cache policy stripping in
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
Medium · CVSS 6.1CVE-2026-50184GHSA-95QP-CMMW-MGQV

Request Credential & Cache Policy Stripping in Angular Service WorkerCVE-2026-50184

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-50184 records a Medium severity (CVSS 6.1) vulnerability in Request Credential & Cache Policy Stripping in Angular Service Worker. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps @angular/service-worker (npm), @angular/service-worker (npm), @angular/service-worker (npm), @angular/service-worker (npm) and additional mapped packages. Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published May 28, 2026Updated Jul 15, 2026Source checked Oct 10, 2026First seen by HOL Jun 19, 2026Material review Jul 15, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
Medium · CVSS 6.1
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
9 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 6.1. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps @angular/service-worker (npm), @angular/service-worker (npm), @angular/service-worker (npm), @angular/service-worker (npm) and additional mapped packages. Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
@angular/service-workernpm>=22.0.0-next.0,<22.0.0-rc.222.0.0-rc.2
@angular/service-workernpm>=21.0.0-next.0,<21.2.1521.2.15
@angular/service-workernpm>=20.0.0-next.0,<20.3.2220.3.22
@angular/service-workernpm>=19.0.0-next.0,<19.2.2319.2.23
@angular/service-workernpm<=18.2.14Not reported
@angular/service-workernpm>=22.0.0-next.0<22.0.0-rc.2Not reported
@angular/service-workernpm>=21.0.0-next.0<21.2.15Not reported
@angular/service-workernpm>=20.0.0-next.0<20.3.22Not reported
@angular/service-workernpm>=19.0.0-next.0<19.2.23Not reported

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for @angular/service-worker, @angular/service-worker, @angular/service-worker.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update @angular/service-worker to 22.0.0-rc.2; @angular/service-worker to 21.2.15; @angular/service-worker to 20.3.22; @angular/service-worker to 19.2.23 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    May 28, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Jul 15, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Jun 19, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • NVD vulnerability recordnvd.nist.gov
Upstream source description

An issue in the `@angular/service-worker` package compromises the integrity of request-policy enforcement during request reconstruction. When the Angular Service Worker intercepts network requests for matched assets, it reconstructs a new `Request` object using an internal helper function. During this reconstruction process, the helper function strips explicit client-defined safety parameters: the credentials configuration (such as `credentials: 'omit'`) and the HTTP `cache` mode configuration (such as `cache: 'no-store'`). These are reverted back to standard browser-default parameters (`credentials: 'same-origin'` and default HTTP cache properties). This causes the browser to include active credentials (such as cookies or Authorization headers) on outbound requests where the client-side developer explicitly instructed they should be omitted, leading to potential session leaks. Additionally, it causes private or non-cacheable resources to be cached by the service worker's engine, making private page states accessible or persistent inside the client's local cache post-logout. ### Impact Web applications registering the `@angular/service-worker` package are vulnerable to credential exposure or post-logout cache persistence if client-side code relies on fetch calls with explicit safety attributes (such as `{ credentials: 'omit' }` or `{ cache: 'no-store' }`) targeting paths matched by service worker asset groups. By stripping these safety boundaries, the service worker exposes same-origin cookies and dynamic sensitive data to endpoints that should not receive them, or retains dynamic user sessions in cache storage where logout operations fail to fully evict user records. ### Attack Preconditions To successfully exploit this vulnerability, all of the following application states and parameters must concurrently exist: 1. **Active Angular Service Worker:** The target application uses `@angular/service-worker` and has an active registration of `ngsw-worker.js` inside the client's browser context. 2. **Asset Group Matching:** An `assetGroups` pattern in `ngsw-config.json` encompasses the target dynamic routing endpoint. 3. **Established User Session:** The victim user currently has an active authentication state, such as valid same-origin session cookies or auth headers stored by the browser. 4. **Client-Side Safe Fetch Call:** The application initiates an explicit fetch request to the route with safety parameters: `{ credentials: 'omit' }` or specific cache control parameters (e.g. `{ cache: 'no-store' }`). ### Mitigations & Workarounds If upgrading the `@angular/service-worker` package is not immediately feasible, developers should implement the following defensive measures: * **Strict Cookie Configuration:** Apply strict flags to session cookies (`SameSite=Strict; Secure; HttpOnly`) and ensure complete route isolation for credential-guarded secure resources. * **Exclude Secure Endpoints from SW Config:** Ensure that patterns targeting dynamic, secure endpoints are explicitly excluded from automatic asset groups or caching scopes in your `ngsw-config.json`. * **Post-Logout Cache Invalidation:** Programmatically purge the browser's Cache Storage API entries registered by the Angular Service Worker upon user logout: ```javascript if ('caches' in window) { caches.keys().then(names => { for (let name of names) { if (name.startsWith('ngsw:')) { caches.delete(name); } } }); } ``` ### Patches - 22.0.0-rc.2 - 21.2.15 - 20.3.22 - 19.2.23 ### References - https://github.com/angular/angular/pull/68904

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Related CVEs

  • Contao: Protected page content is disclosed to anonymous visitors after contao.search.index_protected is disabledAlso CWE-200
  • Contao: Improper access control in the table access voterAlso CWE-524
  • Tina: Code injection via unescaped Git branch name in generated client sourceSame npm ecosystem
  • @tinacms/web-components: `tina-markdown` writes rich-text link URLs into `href` without scheme validation, allowing stored XSSSame npm ecosystem
  • TinaCMS admin preview iframe loads an attacker-controlled origin from the URL fragmentSame npm ecosystem

Record context

Vulnerability class
Arbitrary File Read
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-200, CWE-524
Source
GitHub Security Advisories
Source checked
Oct 10, 2026
References
4 linked sources
Open source record