HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 52725 angularcore angular template and dynamic
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Affiliate program
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright ยฉ 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
Medium ยท CVSS 6.1CVE-2026-52725GHSA-692R-GRFM-V8X7

@angular/core: Angular Template and Dynamic Component Namespace Bypass leading to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)CVE-2026-52725

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-52725 records a Medium severity (CVSS 6.1) vulnerability in @angular/core: Angular Template and Dynamic Component Namespace Bypass leading to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps @angular/core (npm), @angular/core (npm), @angular/core (npm), @angular/core (npm) and additional mapped packages. Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published May 28, 2026Updated Jul 15, 2026Source checked Nov 1, 2026First seen by HOL Jun 19, 2026Material review Jul 15, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
Medium ยท CVSS 6.1
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
14 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 6.1. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps @angular/core (npm), @angular/core (npm), @angular/core (npm), @angular/core (npm) and additional mapped packages. Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
@angular/corenpm>=21.0.0-next.0,<21.2.1521.2.15
@angular/corenpm>=22.0.0-next.0,<22.0.0-rc.222.0.0-rc.2
@angular/corenpm>=19.0.0-next.0,<19.2.2219.2.23
@angular/corenpm>=20.0.0-next.0,<20.3.2220.3.22
@angular/corenpm<=18.2.14Not reported
@angular/corenpm>=21.0.0-next.0,<21.2.1521.2.15
@angular/corenpm>=22.0.0-next.0,<22.0.0-rc.222.0.0-rc.2
@angular/corenpm>=19.0.0-next.0,<19.2.2219.2.23
@angular/corenpm>=22.0.0-next.0<22.0.0-rc.2Not reported
@angular/corenpm>=20.0.0-next.0<20.3.22Not reported
@angular/corenpm>=19.0.0-next.0<19.2.22Not reported
@angular/corenpm>=20.0.0-next.0,<20.3.2220.3.22
@angular/corenpm<=18.2.14Not reported
@angular/corenpm>=21.0.0-next.0<21.2.15Not reported

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for @angular/core, @angular/core, @angular/core.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update @angular/core to 21.2.15; @angular/core to 22.0.0-rc.2; @angular/core to 19.2.23; @angular/core to 20.3.22; @angular/core to 21.2.15; @angular/core to 22.0.0-rc.2; @angular/core to 19.2.23; @angular/core to 20.3.22 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    May 28, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Jul 15, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Jun 19, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • NVD vulnerability recordnvd.nist.gov
Upstream source description

An issue in the `@angular/core` package allows bypassing script-execution restrictions during dynamic component creation. Specifically, the dynamic component instantiation mechanism (`createComponent`) failed to reject mounting components directly onto a `<script>` or namespaced script element (such as `<svg:script>`). This enabled the initialization of custom components on a tag that executes scripts, allowing attackers to hijack or inject script-executing hosts. This flaw enables an attacker who can control the host element or selector parameter passed to `createComponent` to initialize or mount an Angular component directly onto a `<script>` tag, leading to execution of untrusted code or client-side Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). ### Impact Any Angular application that registers dynamic components based on user-supplied parameters (like selectors or host elements) is vulnerable to this security bypass. Once exploited, this allows a malicious actor to mount a dynamic component on a script tag, bypassing core dynamic component creation safeguards to execute arbitrary JavaScript within the target user's browser context. This could lead to session hijacking, sensitive data exposure, or unauthorized actions on behalf of the user. ### Attack Preconditions To successfully exploit these vulnerabilities, the following environment parameters and application states must all concurrently exist: 1. **User-Controlled Host Selection:** The application must accept user-controlled inputs that are passed as a selector/host element to `createComponent`. 2. **Absence of Additional Context Sanitization:** The application does not perform separate input sanitization before feeding values to the dynamic creation APIs. ### Patches * 22.0.0-rc.2 * 21.2.15 * 20.3.22 * 19.2.23 ### References * https://github.com/angular/angular/pull/68686 * https://github.com/angular/angular/pull/68713

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Related CVEs

  • Media Library Assistant < 3.44 - Contributor+ Stored XSS via mla_item_parameter Shortcode AttributeAlso CWE-79
  • PostyBirb Plus Submission Description Editor DescriptionInput.tsx cross site scriptingAlso CWE-79
  • Thelia before 3.1.0 Stored XSS via Coupon Condition Customer NameAlso CWE-79
  • Thelia before 3.1.1 Stored XSS via SVG Store Logo and Banner UploadsAlso CWE-79
  • WebDyne versions from 2.014 before 3.022 for Perl reflect request parameters unescaped into form field values, allowing cross-site scriptingAlso CWE-79

Record context

Vulnerability class
XSS
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-79
Source
GitHub Security Advisories
Source checked
Nov 1, 2026
References
5 linked sources
Open source record